Identifying Strategic Development Objectives for European Union’s Potential Candidate States Using Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach: Case Study of Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 1 Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Canada
- 2 Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Canada
- 3 Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Canada
Abstract
This research is the second of a series of three researches to cope with strategic development objectives using Dominance-based Rough Set Approach (DRSA). The objective of this article is to expose the results of a research using DRSA to help the European Union (EU) identifying political, economical, sociological and technological strategic objectives for potential candidate countries planning to join the EU. Using the proposed methodology, politicians and leaders will be able to prioritize strategic development objectives according to political, economical, sociological and technological (PEST) needs of a specific candidate country to the EU. More precisely, the proposed methodology classifies all the European Union’s countries according to the following three different categories: [A] EU countries that are doing well according to the selected indicators; [B] EU countries that need support to acquire category A status; [C] EU countries ranked the lowest and needing special support with regard to the criterion or criteria considered. The three categories are delimited by tertiles relative to the average ranking of all EU countries including a potential candidate country, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Afterwards, DRSA provides decision rules based on this classification. These decision rules thus focus on the PEST needs of countries with respect to improve their development and classification by pointing out what was needed to be part of the different categories. We strongly believe that by targeting these identified needs, this research will help the development of the European Union’s economy, target and prioritize economical and sociological improvements with the use of strategic objectives for any candidate country. One of the results concerning our case study with Bosnia and Herzegovina is about the fact that this potential country has a weakness in the percentage of women in politics. Indeed, our research as shown that this criterion has an impact for the overall classification of the EU countries.
- Rozenber, O. (2015) Faut-Il continuer à étudier l’Union européenne? Politique Européenne, 50, 296-309.
- Guyader, M. (2007) élargissements et intégration dans l’Union. Politique Etrangère, 2, 367-380. https://doi.org/10.3917/pe.072.0367
- Krulic, J. (2013) Croatie: Une adhésion si longtemps désirée à l’UE, La revue géopolitique.
- Kralj, D. and Markic, M. (2008) Processes Innovation and Sustainable Development. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 2, 99-110.
- Pawlak, Z. (1982) Rough Set. International Journal of Parallel Programming, 11, 341-356.
- Pawlak, Z. (1991) Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3534-4
- Pawlak, Z. and Slowinski, R. (1994) Rough Set Approach to Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 72, 443-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90415-4
- Pawlak, Z. (2002) Rough Set Theory and Its Applications. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Theory, 3, 7-10.
- Greco, S., Matarazzo, B. and Slowiński, R. (2001) Rough Sets Theory for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00167-3
- Zaras, K. (2004) Rough Approximation of a Preference Relation by a Multi-Attribute Stochastic Dominance for Deterministic, Stochastic and Fuzzy Evaluation Problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 159, 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00391-6
- Zaras, K., Marin, J.-C. and Boudreau-Trudel, B. (2012) Dominance Rough Set Approach as a Decision-Making Method for the Selection of Sustainable Development Projects. American Journal of Operational Research, 2, 506.
- Ho, H., Fann, W., Chiang, H., Nguyen, P., Pham, D., Nguyen, P. and Nagai, M. (2016) Application of Rough Set, GSM and MSM to Analyze Learning Outcome—An Example Introduction to Education. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 8, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.4236/jilsa.2016.81003
- Renaud, J., Thibault, J., Lanouette, R., Kiss, L.N., Zaras, K. and Fonteix, C. (2007) Comparison of Two Multi-Criteria Methods: Net Flow and Rough Set Methods for aid to Decision Making in a High Yield Pulping Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1418-1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.013