Competitiveness and Public Debts in Times of Crisis
- 1 Department of Economics, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece
- 2 Department of Economics, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece
- 3 Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Peloponnese, Corinth, Greece
Abstract
It is observed that countries, possibly more than ever, try to remain or become (more) competitive. This has been felt especially during the recent economic crisis, when countries facing a high debt or deficit attempted to find solutions to overcome it. In most cases the first measures attempted to confront debt or deficit, whatever the problem was. Competitiveness and growth have been discussed but always came second. Sometimes, they were not even considered early enough, although they are of equal or even higher importance. We believe that a country should remain competitive at all times, especially at times of crisis, as it can help it contain its debt (public and private). We even trust that countries that maintain their competitiveness are more capable in weathering adverse economic environments. The purpose of this article is to prove, using an econometric model, the existence of a relationship between the external competitiveness of an economy and its public and private sector deficits, as measured by the relevant debt levels. We indeed find evidence that public and private debt is definitely linked to the country competitiveness as measured by GDP growth, GDP per capita, ease of doing business, tax rate, pensions and unemployment . This can be of use to institutions and policy makers when they want to decide how they will secure that their country is and remains competitive, especially in times of crisis.
- Afonso, A. and Jalles, J.T. (2013) Growth and Productivity: The Role of Government Debt. International Review of Economics and Finance, 25, 384-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2012.07.004
- Panizza, U. and Presbitero, A.F. (2014) Public Debt and Economic Growth: Is There a Causal Effect? Journal of Macroeconomics, 41, 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.03.009
- Greiner, A. (2012) Public Debt in a Basic Endogenous Growth Model. Economic Modelling, 29, 1344-1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.03.005
- égert, B. (2015) Public Debt, Economic Growth and Nonlinear Effects: Myth or Reality? Journal of Macroeconomics, 43, 226-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.11.006
- Teles, V.K. and Mussolini, C.C. (2014) Public Debt and the Limits of Fiscal Policy to Increase Economic Growth, European Economic Review, 66, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.11.003
- Gómez-Puig, M. and Sosvilla-Rivero, S. (2015) The Causal Relationship between Debt and Growth in EMU Countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37, 974-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.09.004
- Tamai, T. (2014) Public Capital, Deficit Financing, and Economic Growth, in a Stochastic Economy. Journal of Macroeconomics, 42, 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.06.006
- Gossé, J.-B. and Serranito, F. (2014) Long-Run Determinants of Current Accounts in OECD Countries: Lessons for Intra-European Imbalances. Economic Modelling, 38, 451-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.01.008
- Checherita-Westphal, C. and Rother, P. (2012) The Impact of High Government Debt on Economic Growth and Its Channels: An Empirical Investigation for the Euro Area, European Economic Review, 56, 1392-1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.06.007
- Baum, A., Checherita-Westphal, C. and Rother, P. (2013) Debt and GROWTH: New Evidence for the Euro Area. Journal of International Money and Finance, 32, 809-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.07.004
- Kourtellos, A., Stengos, T. and Tan, C.M. (2013) The Effect of Public Debt on Growth in Multiple Regimes. Journal of Macroeconomics, 38, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.08.023
- Spilioti, S. and Vamvoukas, G. (2015) The Impact of Government Debt on Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation of the Greek Market. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 12, 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2014.10.001