Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
A Literature Review of Directors’ Supervising Managers: Based on the Comparison of Equity Incentives and Monetary Salary Incentives
School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- 1 School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
This paper analyzes the relevant literature on directors’ supervision of managers in terms of monetary compensation incentives and equity incentives. By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of monetary compensation incentives and equity incentives in the supervision of managers by directors, this paper believes that equity incentives can more clearly discover the supervisory supervision of directors. At the same time, this paper believes that in the case of equity incentives, joint incentives for directors and managers can promote the supervision of directors. The analysis conclusions of this paper have guiding significance in the actual corporate governance process.
KeywordsDirectorsManagersSupervisionEquity IncentivesMonetary Compensa-tion Incentive
- Brick, I., Palmon, O. and Wald, K. (2006) CEO Compensation, Director Compensation, and Firm Performance: Evidence of Cronyism? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 403-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.08.005
- Linck, J.S., Netter, J.M. and Yang, T. (2008) The Determinants of Board Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 308-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.03.004
- Vafeas, N. (1999) Board Meeting Frequency and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 113-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5
- Faleye, O., Hoitash, R. and Hoitash, U. (2011) The Costs of Intense Board Monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics, 101, 160-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.010
- Ivan, E. and Brick, N.K. (2010) Chidambaran. Board Meetings, Committee Structure, and Firm Value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9, 533-553.
- Cornelli, F., Kominek, Z. and Ljungqvist, A. (2013) Monitoring Managers: Does It Matters? Journal of Finance, 68, 431-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12004
- Miletkov, M.K., Poulsen, A.B. and Wintoki, M.B. (2014) The Role of Corporate Board Structure in Attracting Foreign Investors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 29, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.06.005
- Oxelheim, L. and Randoy, T. (2003) The Impact of Foreign Board Membership on Firm Value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27, 2369-2392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00395-3
- Aboody, D. (2006) Discussion of “Which Approach to Accounting Foremployee Stock Options Best Reflects Market Pricing? Review of Accounting Studies, 11, 247-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-9001-4
- Landsman, W.R., Peasnell, K.V., Pope, P.F. and Shu, Y. (2006) Which Approach to Accounting for Employee Stock Options Best Reflects Market Pricing? Review of Accounting Studies, 11, 203-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-9008-x
- Barth, M.E., Hodder, L.D. and Stubben, S.R. (2013) Financial Reporting for Employee Stock Options: Liabilities or Equity? Review of Accounting Studies, 18, 642-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-013-9230-2
- Core, J.E. and Guay, W.R. (2001) Stock Option Plans for Non-Executive Employees. Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 253-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00062-9
- Guay, W., Kothari, S.P. and Sloan, R. (2003) Accounting for Employee Stock Options. The American Economic Review, 93, 405-409. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321947425