Research on the Entrepreneurial Environment Element System of the Deeply Impoverished Area in Northeast Chongqing
- 1 School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
- 2 School of Business Administration, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing, China
- 3 School of Business Administration, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing, China
Abstract
The returned migrant workers’ starting their own businesses in deeply impoverished areas is a vital way to realize rural vitalization. Therefore, optimizing the entrepreneurial environment in deeply impoverished areas is of great strategic significance. In order to optimize the entrepreneurial environment for returned migrant workers, it is required to firstly define the rural entrepreneurial environment elements needed by the returned migrant workers, so as to determine the rural entrepreneurial environment element system for returned migrant workers. In this article, the deeply impoverished area in northeast Chongqing is taken as an example, and a large sample survey on the migrant workers’ requirements of entrepreneurial environment elements is conducted, and 23 entrepreneurial environment elements are covered in the subsequent questionnaire survey. Factor analysis helps to define the migrant workers’ entrepreneurial environment element system: government and policy efficiency, production factor support, family and social support, entrepreneurial cost level, and business registration convenience. On this basis, measures are proposed to optimize the entrepreneurial environment of the deeply impoverished area.
- Chen, N., & Du, L. (2018). The Evaluation of Entrepreneurial Environment of Farmers Based on Family Farm. Journal of Northwest Agricultural and Forestry University of Science and Technology, 1, 50-57.
- Chi, R. Y. (2002). A Comparative Study on the Entrepreneurial Environment between the United States and Japan. Foreign Economy and Management, 9, 7-13.
- Dill, W. R. (1958). Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 409-443. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390794
- Gartner, W. B., & Shane, S. A. (1995). Measuring Entrepreneurship over Time. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00037-U
- Gnyawali, D. R., & Fogel, D. S. (1994). Environments for Entrepreneurship Development: Key Dimensions and Research Implications. Entrepreneurship. Theory & Practice, 4, 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800403
- Hang, Y. (2016). Analysis on Management of Entrepreneurial Environment for Migrant Workers. Asian Agricultural Research, 1, 79-82.
- Katonáné, J. (2015). Building an Entrepreneurial Environment in Rural Regions: A Possible Way to Develop Human and Social Capital. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 117, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1428
- Marian, H. (2015). Entrepreneurial Environment in Slovakia: Multi-Perspective Comparison with Innovation-Driven Economies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 4, 437-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01652-4
- Nagler, P., & Naudé, W. (2017). Non-Farm Entrepreneurship in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: New Empirical Evidence. Food Policy, 67, 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.019
- Patti, D. M. A., & Mudambi, R. (2016). A Tale of Soil and Seeds: The External Environment and Entrepreneurial Entry. Small Business Economics, 4, 955-980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9744-7
- Selin, D. (2018). Varieties of Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Institutional Foundations of Different Entrepreneurship Types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ Arguments. Small Business Economics, 2, 293-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0002-z
- Thébaud, S. (2015). Business as Plan B: Institutional Foundations of Gender Inequality in Entrepreneurship across 24 Industrialized Countries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4, 671-711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839215591627
- Xiao, Z. Z., Huang, Y., Cheng, Z. Y., & Ling, L. (2018). Research on the Mechanism of the Impact of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Environment on the Choice of Household Assets of Farmers Entering the City. Economic Review, 5, 148-159.