Effectiveness and safety of mouthguards are greatly affected by its thickness. The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of model height and model position on the forming table on the mouthguard thickness in thermoforming using a circular frame. Mouthguards were thermoformed using 4.0-mm-thick ethylene-vinyl-acetate sheets and a vacuum forming machine. The sheet was sandwiched between circular frames and fixed to the clamp of the forming machine. Working models were two types of hard gypsum models trimmed so that the height of the anterior part was 25 mm (Model A) and 30 mm (Model B). The model was placed with its anterior rim positioned 40 mm (P40), 30 mm (P30), 20 mm (P20), or 10 mm (P10) from the front of the forming table. Differences in the reduction rate of the thickness due to the model height and model positions were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. Differences depending on the model height were observed at P40 at the incisal edge and P30, P20, and P10 on the labial surface, and the reduction rate of the thickness was significantly smaller in Model A (P < 0.01). As the distance from the model anterior rim to the front of the forming table was smaller, the rate of the thickness of the incisal edge and the labial surface decreases became larger. The rate of decrease in the thickness of the cusp and buccal surface was the smallest at P20. This study indicated that the difference in the thickness of the single-layer mouthguard depending on the model position on the forming table is affected by the model height. However, that is only the anterior part of the mouthguard, and the difference in thickness reduction rate is less than 5%. Additionally, in order to perform stable forming, it is useful to increase the distance from the model to the frame, and it is important to position the part whose thickness is desired to be maintained in the center of the forming table.
Verissimo, C., Costa, P.V., Santos-Filho, P.C., Tantbirojn, D., Versluis, A. and Soares, C.J. (2016) Custom-Fitted EVA Mouthguards: What Is the Ideal Thickness? A Dynamic Finite Element Impact Study. Dental Traumatology, 32, 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12210
Gialain, I.O., Coto, N.P., Driemeier, L., Noritomi, P.Y. and Dias, R.B. (2016) A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Sports Mouthguard. Dental Traumatology, 32, 409-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12265
Bochnig, M.S., Oh, M.J., Nagel, T., Ziegler, F. and Jost-Brinkmann, P.G. (2017) Comparison of the Shock Absorption Capacities of Different Mouthguards. Dental Traumatology, 33, 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12324
Gawlak, D., Mańka-Malara, K., Mierzwińska-Nastalska, E., Gieleta, R., Kamiński, T. and Luniewska, M. (2017) A Comparison of Impact Force Reduction by Polymer Materials Used for Mouthguard Fabrication. Acta BioengBiomech, 19, 89-95.
Tribst, J.P.M., de Oliveira, D.P.A.M., Borges, A.L.S. and Bottino, M.A. (2018) Influence of Custom-Made and Stock Mouthguard Thickness on Biomechanical Response to a Simulated Impact. Dental Traumatology, 34, 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12432
Bemelmanns, P. and Pfeiffer, P. (2001) Shock Absorption Capacities of Mouthguards in Different Types and Thicknesses. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 22, 149-153. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-11342
Westerman, B., Stringfellow, P.M. and Eccleston, J.A. (2002) EVA Mouthguards: How Thick Should They Be? Dental Traumatology, 18, 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.180103.x
Geary, J.L. and Kinirons, M.J. (2008) Post Thermoforming Dimensional Changes of Ethylene Vinyl Acetate used in Custom-Made Mouthguards for Trauma Prevention: A Pilot Study. Dental Traumatology, 24, 350-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2007.00550.x
Maeda, M., Takeda, T., Nakajima, K., Shibusawa, M., Kurokawa, K. and Shimada, A. (2008) In Search of Necessary Mouthguard Thickness: Part 1 from the View Point of Shock Absorption Ability. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi, 52, 211-219. https://doi.org/10.2186/jjps.52.211
Takeuchi, M. and Togaya, N. (2006) Effectively of Thermoforming Process for Fabricating of Intraoral Apparatus. Sunashobo, Tokyo, 212-216, 33-44, 54-55, 62-67. (in Japanese)
Takahashi, M., Koide, K. and Mizuhashi, F. (2014) Differences in the Thickness of Mouthguards Fabricated from Ethylene Vinyl Acetate Copolymer Sheets with Differently Arranged V-Shaped Grooves: Part 2—Effect of Shape on the Working Model. Dental Traumatology, 30, 472-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12123
Takahashi, M., Araie, Y., Satoh, Y. and Iwasaki, S. (2017) Shape Change in Mouthguard Sheets during Thermoforming—Part 2: Effect of the Anteroposterior Position of the Model on Fabricated Mouthguard Thickness. Dental Traumatology, 33, 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12319
Takahashi, M. and Koide, K. (2016) Variation in Mouthguard Thickness According to Heating Conditions during Fabrication: Part 2 Sheet Shape and Effect of Thermal Shrinkage. Dental Traumatology, 32, 185-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12209
Takahashi, M., Koide, K., Satoh, Y. and Iwasaki, S. (2016) Shape Change in Mouthguard Sheets during Thermoforming. Dental Traumatology, 32, 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12261
Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2018) Effect of the Anteroposterior Position of the Model on Fabricated Mouthguard Thickness: Part 2 Influence of Sheet Thickness and Material. Dental Traumatology, 34, 370-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12423
Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2020) Thermoforming Technique for Suppressing Reduction in Mouthguard Thickness: Part 2 Effect of Model Height and Model Moving Distance. Dental Traumatology, 36, 543-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12554
Takahashi, M., Koide, K. and Mizuhashi, F. (2014) Optimal Heating Conditions for Forming a Mouthguard Using a Circle Tray: Effect of Different Conditions on the Thickness and Fit of Formed Mouthguards. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 58, 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.03.005
Takahashi, M., Koide, K. and Iwasaki, S. (2016) Method for Effectively Maintaining the Thickness of Mouthguards Fabricated Using EVA Sheets and a Circle Tray: Influence of Grooved Sheet and Heating Conditions. Dental Traumatology, 32, 206-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12232
Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2019) Thermoforming Method to Effectively Maintain Mouthguard Thickness: Effect of Moving the Model Position just before Vacuum Formation. Dental Traumatology, 35, 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12447
Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2019) Movement of Model Position just before Vacuum Forming to Ensure Mouthguard Thickness: Part 2 Effect of Model Moving Distance. Dental Traumatology, 35, 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12499
Gawlak, D., Mierzwińska-Nastalska, E., Mańka-Malara, K. and Kamiński, T. (2015) Assessment of Custom and Standard, Self-Adapted Mouthguards in Terms of Comfort and Users Subjective Impressions of Their Protective Function. Dental Traumatology, 31, 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12132
Guérard, S., Barou, J.L., Petit, J. and Poisson, P. (2017) Characterization of Mouthguards: Impact Performance. Dental Traumatology, 33, 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12329
Takahashi, M., Koide, K., Satoh, Y. and Iwasaki, S. (2016) Heating Methods for Reducing Unevenness Softening of Mouthguard Sheets in Vacuum-pressure Formation. Dental Traumatology, 32, 316-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12254
Takahashi, M., Koide, K. and Mizuhashi, F. (2012) Difference in the Thickness of Mouthguards Fabricated from Step-Type Polyolefin-Polystyrene Copolymer Sheets Differently Arranged V-Shaped Grooves. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 56, 281-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2012.03.001
Takahashi, M., Koide, K., Mizuhashi, F. and Sato, T. (2015) Investigation of Vacuum Forming Techniques for Reduction of Loss in Mouthguard Thickness: Part 2 Effects of Sheet Grooving and Thermal Shrinkage. Dental Traumatology, 31, 314-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12162
Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2021) Fabrication Method to Maintain Mouthguard Thickness Regardless of the Model Angle. Dental Traumatology, 37, 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12584
Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2021) Effect of Acute Angle Model on Mouthguard Thickness with the Thermoforming Method and Moving the Model Position just before Fabrication. Dental Traumatology, 37, 138-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12603
Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2021) Effect on Thickness of a Single-Layer Mouthguard of Positional Relationship between Suction Port of the vacuum Forming Device and the Model. Dental Traumatology [Online ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12646
Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2020) Mouthguard Thermoforming Method to Decrease Palatal Thickness while Maintaining Labial and Buccal Thickness. Materials Sciences and Applications, 11, 370-381. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2020.116025