An Investigation of Thermomechanical Behavior of Tunisian Luffa Sponges’ Fibers
- 1 National Engineering School of Gabes, Zrig Eddakhlania, Tunisia
- 2 Laboratory of Technology, Energy and Innovative Materials, TEMI, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa, University of Gafsa, Gafsa, Tunisia
- 3 Laboratory of Technology, Energy and Innovative Materials, TEMI, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa, University of Gafsa, Gafsa, Tunisia
- 4 Laboratory of Technology, Energy and Innovative Materials, TEMI, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa, University of Gafsa, Gafsa, Tunisia
Abstract
This work is realized in the context of valorizing natural and local resources, in particular, luffa plant fruit (luffa sponge). The raw fibers of the luffa sponge have a short lifetime. Hence, when they are chemically treated, it constitutes a solution is prepared to limit their degradation in the long term and to improve their mechanical characteristics. Therefore, this paper studies the effect of the chemical treatment on the mechanical properties of the luffa sponge’s fibers (fibers of luffa Sponge). The chemical process consists of dipping a brunch of luffa in various concentrations of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at different time intervals and at different temperature conditions. The luffa sponge’s fibers were mechanical. Characterized before and after the treatment, mechanically (micro traction test). It has been shown that an optimum of 61% increase in mechanical properties (tensile strength) has been reached in the following conditions: treatment with 1% concentration for 90 min at 50°C.
- Gianpietro, V., Amaducci, S. and Vannini, L. (2000) Multi-Use Crops, Programme by DG XII of the European Commission. University Bologna, Bologna, 82-83.
- Guo, Y., Wang, L., Chen, Y., Luo, P. and Chen, T. (2019) Properties of Luffa Fiber Reinforced PHBV Biodegradable Composites. Polymers, 11, Article No. 1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11111765
- Mahjoub, R., Yatim, J.M., Sam, A.R.M. and Hashemi, S.H. (2014) Tensile Properties of Kenaf Fiber Due to Various Conditions of Chemical Fiber Surface Modifications. Construction and Building Materials, 55, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.036
- Yousif, B.F., Shalwan, A., Chin, C.W. and Ming, K.C. (2012) Flexural Properties of Treated and Untreated Kenaf/Epoxy Composites. Materials & Design, 40, 378-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.017
- Mohanta, N. and Acharya, S.K. (2018) Effect of Alkali Treatment on the Flexural Properties of a Luffa cylindrica-Reinforced Epoxy Composite. Science and Engineering of Composite Materials, 25, 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2015-0148
- Shibata, M., Takachiyo, K.I., Ozawa, K., Yosomiya, R. and Takeishi, H. (2002) Biodegradable Polyester Composites Reinforced with Short Abaca Fiber. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 85, 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.10665
- Chen, Y., Su, N., Zhang, K., Zhu, S., Zhu, Z., Qin, W., Yang, Y., Shi, Y., Fan, S., Wang, Z. and Guo, Y. (2018), Effect of Fiber Surface Treatment on Structure, Moisture Absorption and Mechanical Properties of Luffa Sponge Fiber Bundles. Industrial Crops and Products, 123, 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.079
- Ali, M., Emsley, A.M., Herman, H. and Heywood, R.J. (2001) Spectroscopic Studies of the Ageing of Cellulosic paper. Polymer, 42, 2893-2900. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00691-1
- Colom, X., Carrasco, F., Pages, P. and Canavate, J. (2003) Effects of Different Treatments on the Interface of HDPE/Lignocellulosic Fiber Composites. Composites Science and technology, 63, 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00248-8
- Tanobe, V.O., Sydenstricker, T.H., Munaro, M. and Amico, S.C. (2005) A Comprehensive Characterization of Chemically Treated Brazilian Sponge-Gourds (Luffa cylindrica). Polymer Testing, 24, 474-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.12.004
- Sydenstricker, T.H., Mochnaz, S. and Amico, S.C. (2003) Pull-Out and Other Evaluations in Sisal-Reinforced Polyester Biocomposites. Polymer Testing, 22, 375-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00116-2