Dependence of Lower Molding Temperature Limit and Molding Time on Molding Mechanism in Dental Thermoforming
- 1 Department of Physiology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Niigata, Japan
- 2 TAKEUCHI Dental Clinic, Kyoto, Japan
Abstract
Effectiveness and safety of a sports mouthguard depend on its thickness and material, and the thermoforming process affects these. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of differences in molding mechanisms on the lower molding temperature limit and molding time in dental thermoforming. Ethylene vinyl acetate resin mouthguard sheet and two thermoforming machines; vacuum blower molding machine and vacuum ejector/pressure molding machine were used. The molding pressures for suction molding were −0.018 MPa for vacuum blower molding and −0.090 MPa for vacuum ejector molding, and for pressure molding was set to 0.090 MPa or 0.450 MPa. Based on the manufacturer’s standard molding temperature of 95˚C, the molding temperature was lowered in 2.5˚C increments to determine the lower molding temperature limit at which no molding defects occurred. In order to investigate the difference in molding time depending on the molding mechanism, the duration of molding pressure was adjusted in each molding machine, and the molding time required to obtain a sample without molding defects was measured. The molding time of each molding machine were compared using one-way analysis of variance. The lower molding temperature limit was 90.0˚C for the vacuum blower machine, 77.5˚C for the vacuum ejector machine, 77.5˚C for the pressure molding machine at 0.090 MPa, and 67.5˚C for the pressure molding machine at 0.45 MPa. The lower molding temperature limit was higher for lower absolute values of molding pressure. The molding time was shorter for pressure molding than for suction molding. Significant differences were observed between all conditions except between the pressure molding machine at 0.090 MPa and 0.45 MPa (P < 0.01). A comparison of the differences in lower molding temperature limit and molding time due to molding mechanisms in dental thermoforming revealed that the lower molding temperature limit depends on the molding pressure and that the molding time is longer for suction molding than for pressure molding.
- Takeuchi, M. and Togaya, N. (2006) Effectiveness of Thermoforming Process for Fabricating of Intraoral Apparatus. Sunashobo, 23-44, 62-67.
- Takeuchi, M. and Takahashi, M. (2017) Air Permeability of Gypsum Working Model in Dental Thermoforming Process. Journal of Sports dentistry , 20, 27-33.
- Takahashi, M. and Takeuchi, M. (2017) Influence of Surface Treatment Agents on Air Permeability of Plaster Model for Thermoforming. Journal of Sports dentistry , 21, 11-16.
- Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2019) Movement of Model Position Just before Vacuum Forming to Ensure Mouthguard Thickness: Part 2 Effect of Model Moving Distance. Dental Traumatology , 35, 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12499
- Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2022) Examination of Thermoforming Techniques to Secure Mouthguard Thickness of the Labial and Buccal Sides with a Single Sheet: An in Vitro Study. Dental Traumatology , 38, 332-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12739
- Takahashi, M. and Koide, K. (2015) Optimal Heating Condition of Mouthguard Sheet in Vacuum-Pressure Formation: Part 2 Olefin-Based Thermoplastic Elastomer. Dental Traumatology , 32, 90-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12206
- Takahashi, M., Koide, K., Satoh, Y. and Iwasaki, S. (2015) Heating Methods for Reducing Unevenness Softening of Mouthguard Sheets in Vacuum-Pressure Formation. Dental Traumatology , 32, 316-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12254
- Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2020) Controlling Softened State of Mouthguard Sheet during Thermoforming to Ensure Thickness. Materials Sciences and Applications , 11, 431-440. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2020.117029
- Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2020) Thermoforming Technique for Suppressing Reduction in Mouthguard Thickness: Part 2 Effect of Model Height and Model Moving Distance. Dental Traumatology , 36, 543-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12554
- Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2020) Fabrication Method to Maintain Mouthguard Thickness Regardless of the Model Angle. Dental Traumatology , 37, 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12584
- Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2022) Dependence of Thermoformed Mouthguard Thickness on Model Height in Single-Layer and Laminated Mouthguards. Materials Sciences and Applications , 13, 469-478. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2022.138028
- Takahashi, M. and Bando, Y. (2023) In Vitro Study of How the Undercut Amount on the Model Labial Side Affects the Reduction Rate of Laminated Mouthguard Thickness. Dental Traumatology , 39, 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12820