The Effect of Storage Solutions on Mineral Content of Enamel
- 1 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey
- 2 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sifa University, ?zmir, Turkey
- 3 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Selcuk, Konya, Turkey
- 4 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural, University of Selcuk, Konya, Turkey
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the influence of different storage times and storage solutions on the mineral content of enamel. Methods: Ninety enamel slabs were randomly divided into 2 groups of 45: a 45-day group and a 90-day group. Each of these main groups was further subdivided into 9 experimental groups of 5 slabs, and each subgroup was stored in a different storage solution. The mean percentage weights of 5 elements (calcium, potassium, sodium, phos phorus, and magnesium) presented in each enamel slab w as measured after storage using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tu r key’s honestly significant difference tests were used to analyze differences between the groups. Results: S torage conditions significantly affected the levels of calcium, potassium, sodium, and phosphorus ( p < 0 .05). Storage procedures can significantly affect the calcium, po tassium, sodium, and phosphorus contents of enamel.
- J. J. Lee, A. Nettey-Marbell, A. Cook, L. A. Pimenta, R. Leonard and A. V. Ritter, “Using Extracted Teeth for Research: The Effect of Storage Medium and Sterilization on Dentin Bond Strengths,” The Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol. 138, No. 12, 2007, pp. 15991603.
- H. E. Goodis, G. W. Marshall, J. M. White, L. Gee, B. Hornberger and S. J. Marshall, “Storage Effects on Dentin Permeability and Shear Bond Strengths,” Dental Materials, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1993, pp. 79-84. doi:10.1016/0109-5641(93)90079-6
- S. R. Armstrong, J. C. Keller and D. B. Boyer, “The Influence of Water Storage and C-Factor on the Dentin-Resin Composite Microtensile Bond Strength and Debond Pathway Utilizing a Filled and Unfilled Adhesive Resin,” Dental Materials, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2001, pp. 268-276. doi:10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00081-6
- J. De Munck, K. Shirai, Y. Yoshida, S. Inoue, K. Van Landuyt, P. Lambrechts, K. Suzuki, H. Shintani and B. Van Meerbeek, “Effect of Water Storage on the Bonding Effectiveness of 6 Adhesives to Class I Cavity Dentin,” Operative Dentistry, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2006, pp. 456-465. doi:10.2341/05-57
- J. P. DeWald, “The Use of Extracted Teeth for in Vitro Bonding Studies: A Review of Infection Control Considerations,” Dental Materials, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1997, pp. 74-81. doi:10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80015-2
- H. E. Goodis, G. W. Marshall and J. M. White, “The Effects of Storage after Extraction of the Teeth on Human Dentine Permeability in Vitro,” Archives of Oral Biology, Vol. 36, No. 8, 1991, pp. 561-566. doi:10.1016/0003-9969(91)90105-4
- B. Haller, N. Hofmann, B. Klaiber and U. Bloching, “Effect of Storage Media on Microleakage of Five Dentin Bonding Agents,” Dental Materials, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1993, pp. 191-197. doi:10.1016/0109-5641(93)90119-B
- S. Jaffer, L. J. Oesterle and S. M. Newman, “Storage Media Effect on Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vol. 136, No. 1, 2009, pp. 83-86. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.028
- T. Komabayashi, C. Ahn, S. Zhang, Q. Zhu and L. S. Spangberg, “Chronologic Comparison of Root Dentin Moisture in Extracted Human Teeth Stored in Formalin, Sodium Azide, and Distilled Water,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, Vol. 108, No. 1, 2009, pp. e50-e54. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.022
- S. Y. Lee and C. T. Lin, “Storage Effect on Dentine Structure and on Resultant Composite Bond Strengths,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, Vol. 24, No. 11, 1997, pp. 823-834. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00574.x