The Effect of Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Range of Motion Exercise on Paretic Hand Function in Female Patients after Stroke — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Effect of Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Range of Motion Exercise on Paretic Hand Function in Female Patients after Stroke
Laboratory of Health Science & Nanophysiotherapy, Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Yongin University, Yongin, South Korea;
,
Laboratory of Health Science & Nanophysiotherapy, Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Yongin University, Yongin, South Korea;
,
Laboratory of Health Science & Nanophysiotherapy, Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Yongin University, Yongin, South Korea
,
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health & Welfare, Yongin University, Yongin, South Korea.
,
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health & Welfare, Yongin University, Yongin, South Korea.
1 Laboratory of Health Science & Nanophysiotherapy, Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Yongin University, Yongin, South Korea;
2 Laboratory of Health Science & Nanophysiotherapy, Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Yongin University, Yongin, South Korea;
3 Laboratory of Health Science & Nanophysiotherapy, Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Yongin University, Yongin, South Korea
4 Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health & Welfare, Yongin University, Yongin, South Korea.
5 Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health & Welfare, Yongin University, Yongin, South Korea.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has recently been demonstrated to improve motor function after stroke. However, no study has yet tested the synergetic effects of physical exercise on rTMS in clinical settings. We investigated the effect of a 6-session course of low frequency rTMS on contralesional primary motor cortex combined with range-of motion (ROM) exercise on paretic hand function in female stroke patients. This was a single-blind study of the effects of rTMS with or without ROM exercise in female hemiplegic patients after stroke. All patients underwent rTMS on the contralesional primary motor cortex for 15 minutes and ROM exercise on the paretic hand. The cortical excitability determined by the amplitude and latency of the motor evoked potential (MEP) was measured in both first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles. We also evaluated arm function using Box and Block, arm reach, 9-hole pegboard, power grip, and pinch grip force tests. The rTMS-induced MEP amplitude of the paretic side significantly increased whereas the non-paretic side showed a decrease through every session. However, the MEP latency significantly in creased on the non-paretic hand at post-rTMS with exercise, but a tendency of decrement on paretic hand at same ap plication. Motor function showed improvement in the 9-hole pegboard and arm reach tests at post-rTMS with exercise on the paretic side compared with the non-paretic side. A significant correlation was especially noted between motor function and MEP on the paretic side of stroke patients. Low frequency rTMS with ROM exercise improved hand func tion after stroke. This may, in part, result in additional rehabilitation in stroke patients.
KeywordsRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic StimulationRange of Motion ExerciseStrokeMotor Recover
N. Takeuchi, T. Tada, M. Toshima, T. Chuma, Y. Matsuo and K. Ikoma, “Inhibition of the Unaffected Motor Cortex by 1 Hz Repetitive Transcranical Magnetic Stimulation Enhances Motor Performance and Training Effect of the Paretic Hand in Patients with Chronic Stroke,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2008, pp. 298-303. doi:10.2340/16501977-0181
A. Peinemann, B. Reimer, C. Loer, A. Quartarone, A. Munchau, B. Conrad and H. R. Siebner, “Long-Lasting Increase in Corticospinal Excitability after 1800 Pulses of Subthreshold 5 Hz Repetitive TMS to the Primary Motor Cortex,” Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 115, No. 7, 2004, pp. 1519-1526. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.02.005
A. J. Butler and S. L. Wolf, “Putting the Brain on the Map: Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Assess and Induce Cortical Plasticity of Upper-Extremity Movement,” Physical Therapy, Vol. 87, No. 6, 2007, pp. 719-736. doi:10.2522/ptj.20060274
H. M. Feys, W. J. de Weerdt, B. E. Selz, G. A. Cox Steck, R. Spichiger, L. E. Vereeck, K. D. Putman and G. A. van Hoydonck, “Effect of a Therapeutic Intervention for the Hemiplegic Upper Limb in the Acute Phase after Stroke: A Single Blind, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial,” Stroke, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1998, pp. 785-792. doi:10.1161/01.STR.29.4.785
A. Sunderland, D. J. Tinson, E. L. Bradley, D. Fletcher, R. Langton Hewer and D. T. Wade, “Enhanced Physical Therapy Improves Recovery of Arm Function after Stroke. A Randomised Controlled Trial,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Vol. 55, No. 7, 1992, pp. 530-535. doi:10.1136/jnnp.55.7.530
C. N. Tseng, C. C. Chen, S. C. Wu and L. C. Lin, “Effects of a Range of Motion Exercise Programme,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 57, No. 2, 2007, pp. 181-191. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04078.x
C. Hofgren, A. Bjorkdahl, E. Esbjornsson and K. Stibrant-Sunnerhagen, “Recovery after Stroke: Cognition, ADL Function and Return to Work,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, Vol. 115, No. 2, 2007, pp. 73-80. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00768.x
Y. H. Kim, S. H. You, M. H. Ko, J. W. Park, K. H. Lee, S. H. Jang, W. K. Yoo and M. Hallett, “Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Corticomotor Excitability and Associated Motor Skill Acquisition in Chronic Stroke,” Stroke, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1471-1476. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000221233.55497.51
N. S. Ward and L. G. Cohen, “Mechanisms Underlying Recovery of Motor Function after Stroke,” Archives of Neurology, Vol. 61, No. 12, 2004, pp. 1844-1848. doi:10.1001/archneur.61.12.1844
C. Patten, J. Lexell and H. E. Brown, “Weakness and Strength Training in Persons with Poststroke Hemiplegia: Rationale, Method, and Efficacy,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 41, No. 3A, 2004, pp. 293-312. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2004.03.0293
J. V. Escudero, J. Sancho, D. Bautista, M. Escudero and J. Lopez-Trigo, “Prognostic Value of Motor Evoked Potential Obtained by Transcranial Magnetic Brain Stimulation in Motor Function Recovery in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke,” Stroke, Vol. 29, No. 9, 1998, pp. 1854-1859. doi:10.1161/01.STR.29.9.1854
F. Fregni, P. S. Boggio, A. C. Valle, R. R. Rocha, J. Duarte, M. J. Ferreira, T. Wagner, S. Fecteau, S. P. Rigonatti, M. Riberto, S. D. Freedman and A. Pascual-Leone, “A Sham-Controlled Trial of a 5-Day Course of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Unaffected Hemisphere in Stroke Patients,” Stroke, Vol. 37, No. 8, 2006, pp. 2115-2122. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000231390.58967.6b
C. G. Mansur, F. Fregni, P. S. Boggio, M. Riberto, J. Gallucci-Neto, C. M. Santos, T. Wagner, S. P. Rigonatti, M. A. Marcolin and A. Pascual-Leone, “A Sham Stimulation-Controlled Trial of rTMS of the Unaffected Hemisphere in Stroke Patients,” Neurology, Vol. 64, No. 10, 2005, pp. 1802-1804. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000161839.38079.92
N. B. Lincoln, R. H. Parry and C. D. Vass, “Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate Increased Intensity of Physiotherapy Treatment of Arm Function after Stroke,” Stroke, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1999, pp. 573-579. doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.3.573
B. J. Brouwer and K. Schryburt-Brown, “Hand Function and Motor Cortical Output Poststroke: Are They Related?” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 87, No. 5, 2006, pp. 627-634. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.006
N.Takeuchi, T. Tada, T. Chuma, Y. Matsuo, I. Watanabe and K. Ikoma, “Repetitive Transcranical Magnetic Stimulation of Contralesional Primary Motor Cortex Improves Hand Function after Stroke,” Stroke, Vol. 36, No. 12, 2005, pp. 2681-2686. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000189658.51972.34
S. Pak and C. Patten, “Strengthening to Promote Functional Recovery Poststroke: An Evidence-Based Review,” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2008, pp. 177-199. doi:10.1310/tsr1503-177
I. Indovina and J. N. Sanes,” On Somatotopic Representation Centers for Finger Movements in Human Primary Motor Cortex and Supplementary Motor Area,” Neuroimage, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2001, pp. 1027-1034. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0776
M. A. Diego, T. Field, M. Hernandez-Reif, S. Hart, B. Brucker, T. Field and I. Burman, “Spinal Cord Patients Benefit from Massage Therapy,” International Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 112, No. 2, 2002, pp. 133-142. doi:10.1080/00207450212023
P. E. Morris, “Moving Our Critically Ill Patients: Mobility Barriers and Benefits,” Critical Care Clinics, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1-20. doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2006.11.003
N. J. O’Dwyer, L. Ada and P. D. Neilson, “Spasticity and Muscle Contracture Following Stroke,” Brain, Vol. 119, Pt. 5, 1996, pp. 1737-1749. doi:10.1093/brain/119.5.1737
H. T. Hendricks, J. van Limbeek, A. C. Geurts and M. J. Zwarts, “Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 83, No. 11, 2002, pp. 1629-1637. doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.35473
A. A. van Kuijk, J. W. Pasman, H. T. Hendricks, M. J. Zwarts and A. C. Geurts, “Predicting Hand Motor Recovery in Severe Stroke: The Role of Motor Evoked Potentials in Relation to Early Assessment,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2009, pp. 45-51. doi:10.1177/1545968308317578
N. Murase, J. Duque, R. Mazzocchio and L. G. Cohen, “Influence of Interhemispheric Interactions on Motor Function in Chronic Stroke,” Annals of Neurology, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2004, pp. 400-409. doi:10.1002/ana.10848