Estimation of Minimum Miscibility Pressure for Flue Gas Injection Using Soft Experimentations
- 1 Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA
- 2 Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
- 3 Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
- 4 Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA
- 5 Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
Abstract
A new approach is demonstrated in which soft experimentation can be performed for MMP measurements, thus replacing the common practice of slim tube displacement laboratory experiments. Recovery potential from oil reservoirs by miscible flue gas injection was studied by slim tube and field-scale numerical simulation using two flue gases and seven crude oils sampled at different depths in three candidate reservoirs. The soft experimentations were conducted using Eclipse300 TM , a three-phase compositional simulator. This study investigates minimum miscibility pressure (MMP), a significant miscible gas injection project screening tool. Successful design of the project is contingent to the accurate determination of the MMP. This study evaluates effects of important factors such as injection pressure, oil component composition, and injection gas composition on the MMP and recovery efficiency for slim tube and field-scale displacements. Two applicable MMP correlations were used for comparison and validation purposes.
- Srivastava, R.K., Huang, S.S. and Dong, M. (1999) Comparative Effectiveness of CO2 Produced Gas, and Flue Gas for Enhanced Heavy-Oil Recovery. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2, 238-247. https://doi.org/10.2118/56857-PA
- Shokoya, O.S., Mehta, S.A., Moore, R.G., Maini, B.B., Pooladi-Darvish, M. and Chakma, A. (2004) The Mechanism of Flue Gas Injection for Enhanced Light Oil Recovery. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 126, 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1725170
- Taber, J.J., Martin, F.D. and Seright, R.S. (1997) EOR Screening Criteria Revisited Part 1: Introduction to Screening Criteria and Enhanced Recovery Field Projects. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 12, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.2118/35385-PA
- Shokoya, O.S., Mehta, S.A., Moore, R.G. and Maini, B.B. (2005) Effect of Oil and Flue-Gas Compositions on Oil Recovery in the Flue-Gas / Light-Oil Injection Process. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 9-12 October 2005, SPE-97262-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/97262-MS
- Benham, A.L., Dowden, W.E. and Kunzman, W.J. (1960) Miscible Fluid Displacement-Prediction of Miscibility. Transactions of the AIME, 219, 229-237. https://doi.org/10.2118/1484-G
- Kuo, S.S. (1985) Prediction of Miscibility for the Enriched-Gas Drive Process. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, 22-25 September 1985, SPE-14152-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/14152-MS
- Zick, A.A. (1986) A Combined Condensing/Vaporizing Mechanism in the Displacement of Oil by Enriched Gases. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 5-8 October 1986, SPE-15493-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/15493-MS
- Wang, Y. and Orr, F.M. (1998) Calculation of Minimum Miscibility Pressure. The SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Tulsa, 19-22 April 1998, Paper SPE 39683. https://doi.org/10.2118/39683-MS
- Johns, R.T. and Orr, F.M. (1995) Miscible GAS Displacement of Multi-Component Oils. The SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 22-25 October 1995, Paper SPE 30798.
- Glasø, O. (1985) Generalized Minimum Miscibility Pressure Correlation (Includes Associated Papers 15845 and 16287). Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 25, 927-934. https://doi.org/10.2118/12893-PA
- Firoozabadi, A. and Khalid, A. (1986) Analysis and Correlation of Nitrogen and Lean-Gas Miscibility Pressure (Includes Associated Paper 16463). SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1, 575-582. https://doi.org/10.2118/13669-PA