Establishing a sustainable scale in natural resources management enables effective economic and ecological policies and guarantees the long-term sustainability of economic production. In agriculture, land evaluations determine the land use sustainable scales, that is, those that avoid land degradation and allow the provision of food, wood, energy, and ecosystem services over time. The paper assessed São Paulo State’s agricultural sustainability by analyzing the current land use adequacy to the land use capability map that follows FAO 1976 “guide for land evaluation” and was applied to Sã o Paulo by the State Agricultural Secretariat. Results indicate inefficiencies in land use at the state level, where more than one-third of agricultural lands do not satisfy technical land capability indications. According to technical land use capability, more than 4.5 million hectares are being underused (economic inefficiency) and another 2.2 million hectares are being overused (environmental inefficiency). Pasturelands represent the most unsustainable land use, where 3.7 million hectares are allocated in high quality lands with high agricultural production potential, and another 0.7 million hectares are allocated in lands with very low quality for agriculture, most of than are a degraded . To achieve sustainability, lands with high agricultural production potential should be u sed to improve agriculture and food production and, on the other hand, lands with very low agricultural production potential should be used for wood p roduction, agroforestry, ecotourism and natural ecosystems conservation. Our results provide a framework for improving land use policies in Sã o Paulo S tate and highlight an opportunity to achieve land use sustainability.
KeywordsLand Use PlanningLand CapabilityAgricultural Sustainability
Pennington, D.N., Dalzell, B., Nelson, E., Mulla, D., Taff, S., Hawthorne, P. and Polasky, S. (2017) Cost-Effective Land Use Planning: Optimizing Land Use and Land Management Patterns to Maximize Social Benefit. Ecological Economics, 139, 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.024
Foley, J.A., Defries, R., Asner, G.P., Balford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.R., Chapin, S., Coe, M.T., Daily, G.C., Gibbs, H.K., Helkowski, J.H., Holloway, T., Howard, E.A., Kucharik, C.J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J.A., Prentice, I.C., Ramankutty, N. and Snyder, P.K. (2005) Global Consequences of Land Use. Science, 309, 570-574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
Sutton, P.C. anderson, S.J., Costanza, R. and Kubiszewski, I. (2016) The Ecological Economics of Land Degradation: Impacts on Ecosystem Services Values. Ecological Economics, 129, 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.016
Nkonya, E., Mirzabaev, A. and Von Braun, J. (2016) Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement: A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development. SpringerOpen, Washington DC, 695 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19168-3
Hurni, H. (1997) Concepts of Sustainable Land Management. ITC Journal, 3, 210-215.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations (1993) Guidance for Land Use Planning. FAO Development Series n° 1. Rome.
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A.N., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I. and Thies, C. (2005) Landscape Perspective on Agricultural Intensification and Biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 8, 857-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations (1976) A Framework for Land Evaluation. FAO Soils Bulletin no 32. Rome.
Lepsch, I.F., Espíndola, C.R., Vischi Filho, O.J. and Siqueira, D.S. (2015) Manual para levantamento utilitário e classificação de terras no sistema de capacidade de uso. Campinas. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 170 p.
Bertoni, J. and Lombardi Neto, F. (1999) Conservação do solo. 4° edição, Ed. ícone, São Paulo, 355 p.
Pereira, L.C. and Lombardi Neto, F. (2002) Avaliação da Aptidão Agrícola das terras: proposta metodológica. EMBRAPA Documentos.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatísca (IBGE) (2017) Censo Agro-pecuário Brasileiro 2016/2017.
São Paulo (Estado) Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo (SAA); Secretaria de Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo (SMA); Instituto de economia Agrícola (IEA); Coordenadoria de Desenvolvimento Rural Sustentável (CDRS) (2019) Projeto LUPA 2016/2017: Censo Agropecuário do Estado de São Paulo. SAA: IEA: CDRS, São Paulo.
Tavares, P.A., Brites, A.D., Sparovek, G., Guidotti, V., Cerignoni, F., Aguiar, D., Metzeger, J.P., Rodrigues, R.R., Pinto, L.F.G., Mello, K. and Molin, P.G. (2019) Unfolding Additional Massive Cutback Effects of the Native Vegetation Protection Law on Legal Reserves, Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 19, e20180658. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2018-0658
Meyers, N., Miittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Fonserca, G.A. and Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities. Nature, 403, 853-859. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
SOS Mata Atlantica, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE) (2021) Atlas dos Remanescentes Florestais da Mata Atlantica: Relatório Técnico. São Paulo, 39 p. https://cms.sosma.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/SOSMA_Atlas-da-Mata-Atlantica_2019-2020.pdf
Ribeiro, M.C., Metzger, J.P., Martensen, A.C., Ponzoni, F.J. and Hirota, M.M. (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How Much Is Left, and How Is the Remaining Forest Distributed? Implications for Conservation. Biological Conservation, 142, 1141-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021
Rodrigues, R.R. and Bononi, V.L.R. (2008) Diretrizes para conservação e restauração da biodiversidade no Estado de São Paulo. São Paulo. 248 p.
Medeiros, G.O.R., Giarolla, A., Sampaio, G. and Marinho, M.A. (2016) Estimates of Annual Soil Loss Rates in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência dos Solos, 40, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20150497
Lombardi Neto, F. and Drugowich, M.I. (1994) Manual Técnico de Manejo e Conservação do Solo e água. Campinas. Centro de Comunicação Rural CATI/SAA. 565 p.
Costanza, R. and Daly, H.E. (1992) Natural Capital and Sustainable Development. Conservation Biology, 6, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x
Costanza, R. (1994) Economia ecológica: Uma agenda de pesquisa. In: May, P.H. and Motta, R.S., Eds., Valorando a natureza: A análise econômica para o desenvolvimento sustentável, Ed. Campus, Rio de Janeiro, 195 p.
São Paulo (Estado) (1997) Decreto Estadual 41.719/1997. Regulamenta a Lei 6.171, de 04/07/1988, alterada pela Lei 8.421, de 23/11/1993, que dispõe sobre o uso, conservação e preservação do solo agrícola.
National Geographic; ESRI; Garmin, NOAA. ArcGIS 10.4. Image Library.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e EstatíSCA (IBGE) (2004) Limites dos Biomas do Estado de São Paulo.
Secretaria de Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo (SMA) (2010) Limites políticos e administrativos do Estado de São Paulo.
Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo (SAA); Coordenadoria de Assistência Técnica Integral (CATI); Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC) (2017) Classes de Capacidade Potencial do Uso das Terras Agrícolas do Estado de São Paulo. Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo.
Tosto, S.G. (2010) Sustentabilidade e valoração de serviços ecossistêmicos no espaço rural do município de Araras, São Paulo. Tese de Doutorado. Instituto de Economia, UNICAMP, Campinas, 217 p.
Ramalho-Filho, A., Pereira, E.G. and Beek, K.J. (1983) Sistema de Avaliação da Aptidão Agrícola das terras. 2° edição, EMBRAPA/SNLCS, Rio de Janeiro, 57 p.
Pereira, L.C., Lombardi Neto, F. and Pallone Filho, W.J. (2005) Taxa de adequação de uso das terras e riscos de degradação agroambiental. Revista Científica Rural, Bagé, 10, 39-47.
Soares Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Consta, W., Coe, M., Rodrigues, H. and Alencar, A. (2014) Cracking Brazil’s Forest Code. Science, 344, 363-364. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246663
Strassburg, B.N., Latawiec, A., Baroni, L.G., Nobre, C.A., Silva, V.P., Valetim, J.F., Vianna, M. and Assad, E.D. (2014) When Enough Should Be Enough: Improving the Use of Current Agricultural Lands Could Meet Production Demands and Spare Natural Habitats in Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 28, 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.001
Latawiec, A.E., Strassburg, B.N., Silva, D., Alves-Pinto, H.N., Barbieri-Feltran, R., Castro, A., Iribarrem, A., Rangel, M.C., Kalif, K.A.B., Gardner, T. and Beduschi, F. (2015) Improving Land Management in Brazil: A Perspective from Producers. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 240, 276-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.043
Alves-Pinto, H.N., Latawiec, A.E., Strassburg, B.B.N., Barros, F.S.M., Sansevero, J.B.B., Iribarrem, A., Crouseilles, R., Lemgruber, L., Rangel, M.C. and Silva, A.C.P. (2017) Reconciling Rural Development. And Eco-Logical Restoration: Strategies and Policies Recommendations for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Land Use Policy, 60, 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.004
Strassburg, B.N., Beyer, H., Crouzeilles, R., Iribarrem, A., Barros, F., Siqueira, M.F., Sánches-Tapia, A., Balmfor, A., Sansevero, J.B.B., Bracalion, P.H.S., Broadbent, E.N., Chazdon, R.L., Oliveira Filho, A., Gardner, T.A., Gordon, A., Latawiec, A., Loyola, R., Metzeger, J.P., Mills, M., Possingham, H.P., Rodrigues, R.R., Scaramuzza, C.A.M., Scarano, F.R., Tambosi, L. and Uriarte, M. (2019) Strategic Approaches to Restoring Ecosystems Can Triple Conservation Gains and Halve Costs. Nature, Ecology and Evolution, 3, 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0743-8
Brasil (2012) Law no 12.651 de 25 de maio de 2012 (New Forest Code) Dispõe sobre a proteção da vegetação nativa e dá outras providências. 38 p.