Raccoon Use of Den Trees and Plant Associations in Western Mesophytic Forests: Tree Attributes and Availability or Landscape Heterogeneity? — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Raccoon Use of Den Trees and Plant Associations in Western Mesophytic Forests: Tree Attributes and Availability or Landscape Heterogeneity?
United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Center for Bottomland Hardwood Research, Stoneville, USA; Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska—Fairbanks, Fairbanks, USA
,
Department of Biology and Center for Management, Utilization, and Protection of Water Resources, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, USA
1 United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Center for Bottomland Hardwood Research, Stoneville, USA; Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska—Fairbanks, Fairbanks, USA
2 Department of Biology and Center for Management, Utilization, and Protection of Water Resources, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, USA
We monitored 15 radio-collared raccoons ( Procyon lotor ) on Davies Island in March 1987 - May 1988 to determine the extent to which individual tree attributes or spatial configuration of plant associations (habitat types) across the landscape influenced den use. Of 1091 verified den sites, 428 were in tree cavities. Raccoon occurrence among 4 cover types differed from that expected based on the total area of each across the island and varied across all seasons for all habitat types except Cedar Wood. Preference varied among age and sex groups and across seasons with some groups showing opposite selection for the same cover type in different seasons. Species and diameter-class distributions of selected den trees differed from a random sample of trees across the landscape. Species composition of trees with cavities also differed from the species composition across the study area. American beech ( Fagus grandifolia —relative abundance 8.7%) was over-represented in the sample of trees with cavities (29.4%) and trees selected as dens (65%); diameter at breast height (dbh) of beech den trees averaged 80.0 cm, whereas all beech trees averaged 71.2 cm. For all species combined, mean dbh of den trees was 78.4 cm as compared to trees with cavities (67.6 cm), or all trees (50.4 cm). The relative availability of large, cavity-prone tree species was related to previous logging practices.
J. H. Kaufmann, “Raccoons and Allies,” In: J. A. Chapman and G. A. Feldhammer, Eds., Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management and Economics. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1982, pp. 567-585.
S. S. Ditchkoff, S. T. Saalfeld and C. J. Gibson, “Animal Behavior in Urban Ecosystems: Modifications Due to Human-Induced Stress,” Urban Ecosystems, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2006, pp. 5-12. doi:10.1007/s11252-006-3262-3
K. M. Hodges, M. J. Chamberlain and B. D. Leopold, “Effects of Summer Hunting on Ranging Behavior of Adult Raccoons in Central Mississippi,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 64, No. 1, 2000, pp. 194-198. doi:10.2307/3802990
R. J. Greenwood, “Foods of Prairie Raccoons during the Waterfowl Nesting Season,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 45, No. 3, 1981, pp. 754-760. doi:10.2307/3808714
F. W. Stuewer, “Raccoons: Their Habits and Management in Michigan,” Ecological Monographs, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1943, pp. 203-257. doi:10.2307/1943528
J. L. Cabalka, R. R. Costa and G. O. Hendrickson, “Ecology of the Raccoon in Central Iowa,” Proceedings of Iowa Academy of Science, Vol. 60, 1953, pp. 616-620.
R. S. Dorney, “Ecology of Marsh Raccoons,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1954, pp. 217-225. doi:10.2307/3797717
L. W. Giles, “Utilization of Rock Exposures for Dens and Escape Cover by Raccoons,” American Midland Naturalist, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1942, pp. 171-176. doi:10.2307/2421032
R. T. Butterfield, “Populations, Hunting Pressure, and Movements of Ohio Raccoons,” Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference, Vol. 21, No. 9, 1944, pp. 344-397.
R. T. Butterfield, “The Buying of Den Trees for Raccoon Management,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1950, pp. 244-246. doi:10.2307/3796344
L. F. Whitney and A. B. Underwood, “The Raccoon,” Practical Science Publication Company, Orange, 1952.
H. J. Stains, “The Raccoon in Kansas-Natural History, Management, and Economic Importance,” University of Kansas Museum of Natural History State Biological Survey Miscellaneous Publications, Vol. 10, 1956, pp. 1-76.
L. D. Mech, J. R. Tester and D. W. Warner, “Fall Day Time Resting Habits of Raccoons as Determined by Telemetry,” Journal of Mammalogy, Vol. 47, No. 3, 1966, pp. 450-466. doi:10.2307/1377686
G. H. Hardy, “Movement Ecology of Resident Raccoons in East Tennessee,” M.S. Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1979.
C. I. Taylor, “Movements, Activities and Survival of Translocated Raccoons in East Tennessee,” M.S. Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1979.
A. R. Rabinowitz and. R. Pelton, “Day-Bed Use by Raccoons,” Journal of Mammalogy, Vol. 67, No. 4, 1986, pp. 766-769. doi:10.2307/1381145
J. R. Robb, M. S. Cramer, A. R. Parker and R. P. Urbanek, “Use of Tree Cavities by Fox Squirrels and Raccoons in Indiana,” Journal of Mammalogy, Vol. 77, No. 4, 1996, pp. 1014-1027. doi:10.2307/1382782
K. M. Endres and W. P. Smith, “Influence of Age, Sex, Season and Availability on Den Selection by Raccoons within the Central Basin of Tennessee,” American Midland Naturalist, Vol. 129, No. 1, 1993, pp. 116-131. doi:10.2307/2426440
N. A. Preble, “The Status and Management of Raccoon in Central Ohio,” M.S. Thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus, 1940.
A. Berner and L. W. Gysel, “Raccoon Use of Large Tree Cavities and Ground Burrows,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1967, pp. 706-714. doi:10.2307/3797973
J. H. Schnell, “Rest Site Selection by Radio-Tagged Raccoons,” Minnesota Academy of Science, Vol. 36, 1970, pp. 83-88.
D. G. Schneider, L. D. Mech and J. R. Tester, “Movements of Female Raccoons and Their Young as Determined by Radio-Tracking,” Animal Behavior Monographs, Vol. 4, 1971, pp. 1-43.
W. P. Smith, D. L. Borden and K. M. Endres, “Scent-Station Visits as an Index to Raccoon Abundance: an Experimental Manipulation,” Journal of Mammalogy, Vol. 75, No. 3, 1994, pp. 637-647. doi:10.2307/1382511
W. C. Moffitt, J. F. Brasfield, J. F. Campbell and R. K. Moore, “Soil Survey of DeKalb County, Tennessee,” United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington DC, 1972.
E. L. Braun, “Deciduous forests of Eastern North Ame- rica,” McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1950.
S. M. Stubblefield, Jr., “Soil-Water Relationships of the Vascular Flora of Davies Island, Center Hill Reservoir, DeKalb, County, Tennessee,” M.S. Thesis, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, 1968.
T. M. Schuler, “Fifty Years of Partial Harvesting in a Mixed Mesophytic Forest: Composition and Productivity,” Canadian Journal Forestry Research, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2004 pp. 985-997. doi:10.1139/x03-262
K. M. Endres, “Behavior and Ecology of an Island Popu- lation of Raccoons (Procyon lotor) within the Central Basin, Tennessee,” M.S. Thesis, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, 1989.
W. J. Bigler, and G. L. Hoff, “Anesthesia of Raccoons with Ketamine Hydrochloride,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1973, pp. 364-367. doi:10.2307/3800748
D. A. Gregg and L. D. Olson, “The Use of Ketamine Hydrochloride as an Anesthetic for Raccoons,” Journal of Wildlife Disease, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1975, pp. 335-337.
G. A. Grau, G. C. Sanderson and J. P. Rogers, “Age Determination of Raccoons,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1970, pp. 364-372. doi:10.2307/3799023
G. C. Sanderson, “Methods of Measuring Productivity in Raccoons,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1950, pp. 389-402. doi:10.2307/3797269
J. R. Alldredge and J. T. Ratti, “Further Comparison of Some Statistical Techniques for Analysis of Resource Selection,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 56, No. 1, 1992, pp. 1-9. doi:10.2307/3808785
W. P. Smith, “Plant Associations within the Interior Valleys of the Umpqua River Basin, Oregon,” Journal of Range Management, Vol. 38, No. 6, 1985, pp. 526-530. doi:10.2307/3899745
G. Cottam and J. T. Curtis, “The Use of Distance Measures in Phytosociological Sampling,” Ecology, Vol. 37, No. 3, 1956, pp. 451-460. doi:10.2307/1930167
SAS Institute, Inc., “SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition,” SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, 1988.
J. H. Zar, “Biostatistical Analysis,” 4th Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 1999.
R. I. Jennrich and F. B. Turner, “Measurement of Non-Circular Home Range,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1969, pp. 227-237. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(69)90002-2
C. W. Neu, C. R. Byers and J. M. Peck, “A Technique for Analysis of Utilizati6n-Availability Data,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1974, pp. 541-545. doi:10.2307/3800887
W. P. Smith, “A Bivariate Normal Test for Elliptical Home-Range Models: Biological Implications and Recommendations,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 47, No. 3, 1983, pp. 613-619. doi:10.2307/3808599
W. P. Smith and B. E. Coblentz, “Cattle or Sheep Reduce Fawning Habitat Available to Columbian White-Tailed Deer in Western Oregon,” Northwest Science., Vol. 84, No. 3, 2010, pp. 315-326. doi:10.3955/046.084.0401
N. J. Aebischer, P. A. Robertson and R. E. Kenward, “Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use from Animal Radio-Tracking Data,” Ecology, Vol. 74, No. 7, 1993, pp. 1313-1325. doi:10.2307/1940062
D. H. Johnson, “The Comparison of Usage and Availability Measurements for Evaluating Resource Preference,” Ecology, Vol. 61, No. 1, 1980, pp. 65-71. doi:10.2307/1937156
J. H. Pedlar, L. Fahrig and H. G. Merriam, “Raccoon Habitat Use at 2 Spatial Scales,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 61, No. 1, 1997, pp. 102-112. doi:10.2307/3802419
M. S. Boyce, “Scale for Resource Selection Functions,” Diversity and Distribution, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2006, pp. 269-276. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00243.x
A. S. Johnson, “Biology of the Raccoon (Procyon lotor varius Nelson and Goldman) in Alabama,” Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin. No. 402. Auburn University, 1970.
E. K. Fritzell, “Aspects of Raccoon (Procyon lotor) Social Organization,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, Vol. 56, No. 2, 1978, pp. 260-271. doi:10.1139/z78-035
D. W. Allsbrooks, and M. L. Kennedy, “Movement Patterns of Raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Western Tennessee,” Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science, Vol. 62, No. 1, 1987, pp. 15-19.
F. R. Tabatabai, “Ecology of the Raccoon (Procyon lotor) in Tennessee,” Ph.D. Thesis, Memphis State University, Memphis, 1988.
C. M. Nixon, S. P. Havera and L. P. Hansen, “Initial Response of Squirrels to Forest Changes Associated with Selection Cutting,” Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1980, pp. 298-305.
P. D. Goodrum, V. H. Reid and C. E. Boyd, “Acorn Yields, Characteristics, and Management Criteria of Oaks for Wildlife,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1971, pp. 520-532. doi:10.2307/3799707
A. W. Allen and J. G. Corn, “Relationships between Live Tree Diameter and Cavity Abundance in a Missouri Oak-Hickory Forest,” Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1990, pp. 179-183.
W. C. McComb, “Forestry and Wildlife Habitat Management in Central Hardwoods,” Journal of Forestry, Vol. 80, No. 8, 1982, pp. 490-492.
M. S. Lowney and E. D. Hill, “Wood Duck Nest Sites in Bottomland Hardwood Forests of Mississippi,” Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 53, No. 2, 1989, pp. 378-382 doi:10.2307/3801140
L. W. van Druff, “The Ecology of the Raccoon and Opossum, with Emphasis on Their Role as Waterfowl Nest Predators,” Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, 1971.