Optimal Cellulosic Biomass Contracting with Multiple Feedstocks and Locations, and Multi-Modal Transport
- 1 Division of Arts, Sciences, and Business, Ohio State University ATI, Wooster, USA
- 2 Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
Abstract
Biorefineries are keen to design optimal biomass supply chains to minimize production, harvest, transport, and other costs. Such a design problem is challenging with the availability of multiple feedstocks (agricultural residues, perennials such as energy crops, short rotation woody crops), sourced from multiple harvest sheds, and transported across multiple modes (trucks, rails, and barges). This paper presents a multi-period optimization model to analyze the feasibility of collection from multiple harvest sheds. The results are demonstrated for a case study location in Alpena, MI served by truck and water transport. The model results suggest that: i) perennial biomass with higher yields would be preferred due to higher biomass production per unit area; ii) transport from farther locations are warranted only if the biomass production costs in the farther harvest sheds are cheaper by 20% - 30% compared to the adjacent harvest shed; and iii) the local situations of a biorefinery—characterized by the parametric inputs in the model—play a key role in determining the optimal feedstock composition across multiple harvest sheds. The results also support long term contracts associated with high yielding perennial feedstocks such as energy crops and short rotation woody crops.
- EPA (2015) Cellulosic Biofuel Standard Guidance 2015. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/420b15027_0.pdf
- Meyer, S. and Thompson, W. (2012) How Do Biofuel Use Mandates Cause Uncertainty? United States Environmental Protection Agency Cellulosic Waiver Options. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aepp/pps033
- Thompson, W. and Meyer, S. (2011) EPA Mandate Waivers Create New Uncertainties in Biodiesel Markets. Choices, 26. http://www.choicesmagazine.org/magazine/pdf/cmsarticle_167.pdf
- Fletcher, K. (2014) POET-DSM, DuPont, Abengoa Begin Commissioning Cellulosic Plants. Ethanol Producer Magazine. http://biomassmagazine.com/articles/10511/poet-dsm-dupont-abengoa-begin-commissioning-cellulosic-plants
- Yue, D., You, F. and Snyder, S.W. (2014) Biomass-to-Bioenergy and Biofuel Supply Chain Optimization: Overview, Key Issues and Challenges. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 66, 36-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.11.016
- Gold, S. and Seuring, S. (2011) Supply Chain and Logistics Issues of Bio-Energy Production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 32-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.009
- Surface Freight Transportation (2011) A Comparison of the Costs of Road, Rail, and Waterways Freight Shipments That Are Not Passed on to Consumers. US Government Accountability Office. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-134
- Planco Consulting GmbH, Essen, and Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde (2007) Economical and Ecological Comparison of Transport Modes: Road, Railways, Inland Waterways—Summary of Findings. http://www.bafg.de/DE/08_Ref/U1/03_Projekte/05_Verkehrstraeger/verkehrstraeger_kurz_engl.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
- Searcy, E., Flynn, P., Ghafoori, E. and Kumar, A. (2007) The Relative Cost of Biomass Energy Transport. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 639-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-181-3_52
- Kumarappan, S. and Joshi, S. (2014) Spatially and Temporally Optimal Biomass Procurement Contracting for Biorefineries. BioResources, 9, 2069-2089. http://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.2.2069-2089
- Aldana, H., Lozano, F.J. and Acevedo, J. (2014) Evaluating the Potential for Producing Energy from Agricultural Residues in México Using MILP Optimization. Biomass and Bioenergy, 67, 372-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.05.022
- Sharifzadeh, M., Garcia, M.C. and Shah, N. (2015) Supply Chain Network Design and Operation: Systematic Decision-Making for Centralized, Distributed, and Mobile Biofuel Production using Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) under Uncertainty. Biomass and Bioenergy, 81, 401-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.07.026