The purpose of this research was to identify and make available new and existing information to facilitate more effective response by individuals, organizations, and government entities when storms and other forms of catastrophic disturbance lead to unplanned influxes of downed timber and woody debris across the southeastern United States. To this end, this project explored attitudes and behaviors of stakeholders regarding their post dis aster timber salvage experiences. Findings are reported from twelve focus group sessions with forestry decision makers, including landowners, loggers, foresters, and agency representatives. Data were analyzed using an iterative coding process that organized large quantities of text into fewer categories and identified emergent themes. Relationships between themes and categories were described within and across cases based on their concurrence, antecedents, or consequences. This technique was followed by a content analysis focusing on discovering underlying meanings and understanding explicit versus euphemistic terms. Findings center around economic limitations and opportunities, social networks in resource utilization, and diverse interpretations of the disaster event. As well, findings demonstrate how risk perceptions and disaster experience interact to construct social meanings for disaster and associated preparedness activities. Implications include value-added utilization options for woody storm debris that have been pursued in past storm events and lessons learned that can inform future decisions.
Beebe, G.S. and Omi, P.N. (1993) Wildland Burning: The Perception of Risk. Journal of Forestry, 91, 19-24.
Shindler, B.A. (2000) Landscape-Level Management: It’s All about Context. Journal of Forestry, 98, 10-14.
Nelson, K.C., Monroe, M.C. and Johnson, J.F. (2005) The Look of the Land: Homeowner Landscape Management and Wildfire Preparedness in Minnesota and Florida. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590915233
McCaffrey, S. (2015) Community Wildfire Preparedness: A Global State-of-the- Knowledge Summary of Social Science Research. Current Forestry Reports, 1, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-015-0015-7
Manfredo, M.J., Fishbein, M., Haas, G.E. and Watson, A.E. (1990) Attitudes towards Prescribed Fire Policies. Journal of Forestry, 88, 19-23.
Vining, J. and Merrick, M.S. (2008) The Influence of Proximity to a National Forest on Emotions and Fire-Management Decisions. Environmental Management, 41, 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9041-y
Bowker, J.M., Lim, S., Cordell, H.K., Green, G.T., Rideout-Hanzak, S. and Johnson, C.Y. (2008) Wildland Fire, Risk, and Recovery: Results of a National Survey with Regional and Racial Perspectives. Journal of Forestry, 106, 268-276.
Ryan, R.L. and Wamsley, M.B. (2008) Public Perceptions of Wildfire Risk and Forest Management in the Central Pine Barrens of Long Island (USA). The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 2008, 2.
Shindler, B.A., Toman, E. and McCaffrey, S.M. (2009) Public Perspectives of Fire, Fuels, and the Forest Service in the Great Lakes Region: A Survey of Citizens-Agency Communication and Trust. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 18, 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07135
Gordon, J.S., Stedman, R.C., Matarrita-Cascante, D. and Luloff, A.E. (2010) Wildfire Perception and Community Change. Rural Sociology, 75, 455-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00021.x
McCaffrey, S., Toman, E., Stidham, M. and Shindler, B. (2013) Social Science Research Findings Related to Wildfire Management: An Overview of Recent Findings and Future Research Needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 22, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF11115
Toman, E., Stidham, M., McCaffrey, S. and Shindler, B. (2013) Social Science at the Wildland-Urban Interface: A Compendium of Research Results to Create Fire-Adapted Communities. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
McCaffrey, S.M. and Olsen, C.S. (2012) Research Perspectives on the Public and Fire Management: A Synthesis of Current Social Science on Eight Essential Questions. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
Carroll, M.S., Cohn, P.J., Seeholtz, D.N. and Higgins, L.L. (2005) Fire as a Galvanizing and Fragmenting Influence on Communities: The Case of the Rodeo-Chediski Fire. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590915224
Blanchard, B. and Ryan, R.L. (2007) Managing the Wildland-Urban Interface in the Northeast: Perceptions of Fire Risk and Hazard. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 24, 203-208.
Winter, P. and Cvetkovich, G.T. (2010) Trust Mediates Conservation-Related Behaviors. Ecopsychology, 2, 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2010.0046
Steelman, T.A., McCaffrey, S.M., Velez, A.K. and Briefel, J.A. (2015) What Information Do People Use, Trust, and Find Useful during a Disaster? Evidence from Five Large Wildfires. Natural Hazards, 76, 615-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1512-x
Ryan, B. (2013) Information Seeking in a Flood. Disaster Prevention and Management, 22, 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-05-2012-0059
Toman, E.L., Shindler, B., Absher, J. and McCaffrey, S. (2008) Postfire Communications: The Influence of Site Visits on Local Support. Journal of Forestry, 106, 25-30.
Brenkert-Smith, H. (2010) Building Bridges to Fight Fire: The Role of Informal Social Interactions in Six Colorado Wildland-Urban Interface Communities. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 19, 689-697. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF09063
Sun, C. (2016) Timber Market Recovery after a Hurricane. Forest Science, 62, 600-612. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.15-123
Prestemon, J.P., Abt, K.L., Potter, K.M. and Koch, F.H. (2013) An Economic Assessment of Mountain Pine Beetle Timber Salvage in the West. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 28, 143-153. https://doi.org/10.5849/wjaf.12-032
DiGirolomo, M.F., Allen, D.C., Stehman, S.V., Stout, S.L. and Wiedenbeck, J. (2013) Insect Damage to Wind-Thrown and Standing Live Black Cherry Resulting from Delayed Salvage after a Major Abiotic Disturbance. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 30, 101-108. https://doi.org/10.5849/njaf.12-032
Deng, Y., Munn, I.A., Coble, K. and Yao, H. (2015) Willingness to Pay for Potential Standing Timber Insurance. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 47, 510-538. https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2015.23
Manning, R., Valliere, W. and Minteer, B. (1999) Values, Ethics, and Attitudes toward National Forest Management: An Empirical Study. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419299279515
Bengston, D.N. and Fan, D.P. (1999) Conflict over Natural Resource Management: A Social Indicator Based on Analysis of Online News Media Text. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 493-500.
Manring, N.J. (2004) Locking the Back Door: The Implications of Eliminating Postdecisional Appeals in National Forest Planning. Society and Natural Resources, 17, 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920490270285
Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. (1982) Risk and Culture. University of California Press, Sacramento, CA.
Slovic, P. (1992) Social, Cultural, and Psychological Paradigm. In: Krimsky, S. and Golding, D., Eds., Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, CT, 117-152.
Tierney, K.J. (1999) Toward a Critical Sociology of Risk. Sociological Forum, 14, 215-242.
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P.T., Cannon, I. and Davis, I. (2004) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters. Routledge, London.
Foster, D.R. and Orwig, D.A. (2006) Preemptive and Salvage Harvesting of New England Forests: When Doing Nothing Is a Viable Alternative. Conservation Biology, 20, 959-970. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00495.x
Butler, B.J., Miles, P.D. and Hansen, M.H. (2017) National Woodland Owner Survey Table Web-Application Version 1.0. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Amherst, MA. http://fiatools.fs.fed.us/NWOS/tablemaker.jsp]sessionid=4B67B3508BC661AA68A1416A952330BC
Berg, B.L. (2004) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. 5th Edition, Pearson, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
Patton, M.Q. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd Edition, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Morgan, D.L. (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. 2nd Edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Creswell, J.W. (1998) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Fischer, A.P. and Charnley, S. (2012) Risk and Cooperation: Managing Hazardous Fuel in Mixed Ownership Landscapes. Environmental Management, 49, 1192-1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9848-z
McCaffrey, S. (2015) Community Wildfire Preparedness: A Global State-of-the- Knowledge Summary of Social Science Research. Current Forestry Reports, 1, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-015-0015-7
Tierney, K. and Bruneau, M. (2007) Conceptualizing and Measuring Resilience: A Key to Disaster Loss Reduction.TR News May-June 2007, 14-17.
Cutter, S.L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E. and Webb, J. (2008) A Place-Based Model for Understanding Community Resilience to Natural Disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18, 596-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
Tew, R.D., Straka, T.J. and Cushing, T.L. (2013) The Enduring Fundamental Framework of Forest Resource Management Planning. Natural Resources, 4, 423-434. https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2013.46052
Paveglio, T., Prato, T., Dalenberg, D. and Venn, T. (2014) Understanding Evacuation Preferences and Wildfire Mitigations among Northwest Montana Residents. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 23, 435-444. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13057
Cutter, S.L. (1996) Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Progress in Human Geography, 20, 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259602000407
Vanderford, E., Gordon, J.S., Londo, A.J. and Munn, I. (2014) Using Focus Groups to Assess Educational Programming Needs in Forestry. Journal of Extension, 52, 3FEA9. https://www.joe.org/joe/2014june/a9.php
Useche, P. (2013) Collective Action in Common Pool Resource Management, including Heterogeneity of Opportunities and Exit Options. Natural Resources, 4, 483-489. https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2013.48059