Population Characteristics of Ozark Bass (<i>Ambloplites constellatus</i>) in the Upper White River Basin of Northern Arkansas — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Population Characteristics of Ozark Bass (<i>Ambloplites constellatus</i>) in the Upper White River Basin of Northern Arkansas
Buffalo National River, National Park Service, Harrison, AR, USA
,
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, USA
,
U.S. Geological Survey, Arkansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, USA
,
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Little Rock, AR, USA
1 Buffalo National River, National Park Service, Harrison, AR, USA
2 Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, USA
3 U.S. Geological Survey, Arkansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, USA
4 Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Little Rock, AR, USA
Ozark Bass ( Ambloplites constellatus ) is an understudied, endemic fish species in the Upper White River Basin of northern Arkansas. This study was part of an effort by fisheries managers to gather baseline data about the Ozark Bass to aid in understanding population dynamics and contribute to the limited data available for use in determining the efficacy of harvest regulations. Select population characteristics of Ozark Bass in two northern Arkansas streams were determined, population characteristics of Ozark Bass were compared to Shadow Bass ( Ambloplites ariommus ) and Rock Bass ( Ambloplites rupestris ) data collected from previous studies in southern Missouri, and relative condition, length-at-age, and annual survival of Ozark Bass were compared between sample streams. Sampling occurred in Crooked Creek and the Buffalo River during summer 2013 via boat electroshocking. Length and weight data were recorded for all Ozark Bass collected, and fish ages were determined through selective otolith retrieval and age-length keys. Ozark Bass in Crooked Creek had greater relative condition than Ozark Bass in Buffalo River ( P < 0.001). Neither Ozark bass lengths nor log-transformed weights differed ( P > 0.05) between sexes for fish collected from only the Buffalo River. Ozark Bass mean annual survival was similar between Crooked Creek (55% ± 5% as 95% confidence interval (CI)) and the Buffalo River (50% ± 7% CI) for fish age 2 to 9. Calculated Ozark Bass lengths-at-age for fish from both streams were comparable to the Von Bertalanffy growth estimates, except the Buffalo River age 7 categor y where there was only one observation. The relationship between Ozark Bass age and length differed between sampled streams, and variability in growth rates and length-at-age were observed among Ambloplites species. Results of this study contribute to the understanding of the population dynamics of the Ozark Bass that will lead to improved fisheries management.
Robison, H.W. and Buchanan, T.M. (1988) Fishes of Arkansas. University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville.
Cashner, R.C. and Suttkus, R.D. (1977) Ambloplites constellatus, a New Species of Rock Bass from the Ozark Upland of Arkansas and Missouri with a Review of Western Rock Bass Populations. American Midland Naturalist, 98, 147-161. https://doi.org/10.2307/2424721
National Park Service (NPS) (2017) Surface-Water Quality in the Buffalo River (1985-2011). http://buffaloriveralliance.org/resources/Pictures/Buffalo%20National%20River%20Water%20 Quality%20Report%201985%20-%202011%20Final.pdf
Ozarks Water Watch (OWW) (2018) Upper White River Basin Watershed. https://owwbeaverlake.org/beaver-lake/upper-white-river-basin-watershed
Brown, A.V., Lyttle, M.M. and Brown, K.B. (1998) Impacts of Gravel Mining on Gravel Bed Streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 127, 979-994. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1998)127 2.0.CO;2
Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) (2016) Final 2016 303(d) List Category 5 Streams. https://www.adeq.state.ar.us/water/planning/integrated/303d/pdfs/2016/final-2016-303d-list.pdf
National Park Service (NPS) (2017) Visitor Use Statistics. https://irma.nps.gov/Stats/SSRSReports/Park%20Specific%20Reports/Annual%20Park%20 Recreation%20Visitation%20(1904%20-%20Last%20Calendar%20Year)?Park=BUFF
Arkansas Game & Fish Commission (AGFC) (2018) Statewide Lengths and Daily Limits. https://www.agfc.com/en/fishing/daily-limits
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2016) Climate Impacts in the Southeast. https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/climate-impacts/climate-impactssoutheast_.html
Middaugh, C.R., Kessinger, B. and Magoulick, D.D. (2016) Climate-Induced Seasonal Changes in Smallmouth Bass Growth Rate Potential at the Southern Range Extent. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 27, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12320
National Park Service (NPS) (1983) Buffalo River—River Use Management Plan. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Prepared by Buffalo River and Southwest Regional Office.
Arkansas Geological Survey (2018) Select a Region. https://www.geology.arkansas.gov/geology/stratigraphy.html
Panfil, M.S. and Jacobson, R.B. (2001) Relations among Geology, Physiography, Land Use, and Stream Habitat Conditions in the Buffalo and Current River Systems, Missouri and Arkansas. USGS/BRD/BSR-2001-0005. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia.
Daly, J.J., DeYoung, B., Hostetler, T. and Keller, R.J. (2002) Distribution of Clinostomum marginatum (Yellow Grub) Metacercaria in Smallmouth Bass Populations from Crooked Creek in North Central Arkansas. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, 56, 42-46.
United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2015) Streamstats Version 3.0. https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2017) Data Tools: 1981-2010 Normals. National Centers for Environmental Information, Asheville. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/normals
Whisenant, K.A. and Maughan, O.E. (1989) Smallmouth Bass and Ozark Bass in Buffalo River. Technical Report No. 28, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. National Park Service, Washington, D.C.
Petersen, J.C. and Justus, B.G. (2005) The Fishes of Buffalo River, Arkansas 2001-2003. Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5130, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Society, Reston. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20055130
Robison, H.W., McAllister, C.T. and Shirley, K.E. (2011) The Fishes of Crooked Creek (White River Drainage) in Northcentral Arkansas, with New Records and a List of Species. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, 65, 111-116.
United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2013) National Water Information System: Mapper. https://maps.waterdata.usgs.gov/mapper/index.html
Johnson, R.L., Henry, S.D. and Barkley, S.W. (2010) Distribution and Population Characteristics of Shadow Bass in Two Arkansas Ozark Streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 30, 1522-1528. https://doi.org/10.1577/M10-056.1
Le Cren, E.D. (1951) The Length-Weight Relationship and Seasonal Cycle in Gonad Weight and Condition in the Perch (Perca fluviatilis). Journal of Animal Ecology, 20, 201-219. https://doi.org/10.2307/1540
Quist, M.C., Pegg, M.A. and DeVries, D.R. (2012) Age and Growth. In: Zale, A.V., Parrish, D.L. and Sutton, T.M., Eds., Fisheries Techniques, 3rd Edition, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, 677-731.
Robson, D.S. and Chapman, D.G. (1961) Catch Curves and Mortality Rates. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 90, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1961)90[181:CCAMR]2.0.CO;2
Beverton, R.J.H. and Holt, S.J. (1957) On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations. Chapman and Hall, London.
R Core Team (2015) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org
McInerny, M.C. and Cross, T.K. (2000) Effects of Sampling Time, Intraspecific Density, and Environmental Variables on Electrofishing Catch per Effort of Largemouth Bass in Minnesota Lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 20, 328-336. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020 2.3.CO;2
Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies (CAST) (2006) Arkansas Watershed Information System: A Module of the Arkansas Automated Reporting and Mapping System. http://watersheds.cast.uark.edu/index.php
Haggard, B.E., Moore, P.A. Jr. and Stanley, E.H. (2003) Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentrations and Export from an Ozark Plateau Catchment in the United States. Biosystems Engineering, 86, 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00100-4
Paragamian, V.L. (1989) A Comparison of Day and Night Electrofishing: Size Structure and Catch per Unit Effort for Smallmouth Bass. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 9, 500-503. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1989)009 2.3.CO;2
Blackwell, G.B., Brown, M.L. and Willis, D.W. (2000) Relative Weight (Wr) Status and Current Use in Fisheries Assessment and Management. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 8, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641260091129161
Shin, Y., Rochet, M., Jennings, S., Field, J.G. and Gislason, H. (2005) Using Size-Based Indicators to Evaluate the Ecosystem Effects of Fishing. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 62, 384-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.01.004
Quinn II, T.J. and Deriso, R.B. (1999) Quantitative Fish Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York.
Neuman, R.M. and Allen, M.S. (2007) Size Structure. In: Guy, C.S. and Brown, M.L., Eds., Analysis and Interpretation of Freshwater Fisheries Data, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, 375-422.