Perceptions of Beach Stewards and Information Needs for Shorebird Stopover Sites Vary as a Function of Visitor Interests: Improving Stewardship Programs in Coastal Landscapes — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Perceptions of Beach Stewards and Information Needs for Shorebird Stopover Sites Vary as a Function of Visitor Interests: Improving Stewardship Programs in Coastal Landscapes
Division of Life Sciences, Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, and Pinelands Research Station, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA
,
Endangered and NonGame Species Program, NJ Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, USA
,
Grace Dillingham, Catonsville, USA
,
Wildlife Restoration Partnerships, Greenwich, USA
,
Division of Life Sciences, Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, and Pinelands Research Station, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA
,
Wildlife Restoration Partnerships, Greenwich, USA
1 Division of Life Sciences, Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, and Pinelands Research Station, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA
2 Endangered and NonGame Species Program, NJ Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, USA
3 Grace Dillingham, Catonsville, USA
4 Wildlife Restoration Partnerships, Greenwich, USA
5 Division of Life Sciences, Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, and Pinelands Research Station, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA
6 Wildlife Restoration Partnerships, Greenwich, USA
Many studies have demonstrated that some of the activities of people can disturb nesting and foraging birds, particularly along coasts and estuaries. Some managers respond to human disturbance of sensitive species by closing beaches, but most have stewards monitor and restrict access to beaches or portions of beaches. Yet little is known about the type of visitor or their perceptions of beach stewards. This paper explores the general acceptance of beach stewards and their role in conservation of red knots ( Calidris canutus rufa ), other shorebirds, and horseshoe crabs ( Limulus polyphemus ) along the Delaware Bay (New Jersey) beaches by interviewing 279 visitors during the stopover period. While most people came to see the shorebird and horseshoe crab spectacle (60%), many came for the scenery, tranquility, and recreation. Just over half of the people interviewed said that the stewards were helpful (58%), although most of those that answered this question later said that they provided conservation value (86%), but only 40% said they relied on the stewards for information. On a Likert rating scale of 1 to 5 (the highest value), the mean rating for whether it was important for stewards to be present was 3.87 ± 0.09, and the rating for the presence of stewards who can provide information was 3.71 ± 0.11. In contrast, protection of shorebirds was rated a mean of 4.79 ± 0.04. There were significant visitor type differences in how important stewards were, but not in the importance of stewards who can provide information. Fishermen, recreationists, and people coming for scenery and tranquility rated the presence of stewards higher than those visitors who were interested in either shorebirds or crabs (or both). Ratings also differed significantly as a function of age and gender; older adults and females rated characteristics higher than did people under 30 years and males. Information needs identified by stewards are also discussed. These data can be used by the managers developing a strategy for conservation of shorebirds and other species sensitive to disturbance, and for the implementation of an effective stewardship program.
KeywordsDelaware BayConservation and ProtectionMigration StopoverShorebirdsStewardsStewardship Programs
Morrison, R.I.G. (1984) Migration Systems of Some New World Shorebirds. In: Burger, J. and Olla, B.L., Eds., Shorebirds: Migration and Foraging Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, 125-202.
Colwell, M.A. (2010) Shorebird Ecology, Conservation, and Management. University of California Press, Los Angeles. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520947962
Dey, A.D., Niles, L.J., Smith, J.A.M., Sitters, H.P. and Morrison, G. (2020) Update to the Status of the Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa) in the Western Hemisphere. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, 17 p.
Stidds, C.E., Lemda, B.E., Murray, M.K., Wilson, H.B., Rogers, D.I., Clemens, R.S., Gosbell, K., Hassell, C.J., Jessop, R., Melville, D.S., et al. (2017) Rapid Population Declines in Migratory Shorebirds Relying on Yellow Sea Tidal Mudflats as Stopover Sites. Nature Communications, 8, Article No. 14895. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14895
Duijins, S., Niles, L.J., Dey, A., Aubry, Y., Friis, C., Koch, S., Anderson, A. and Smith, P.A. (2017) Body Condition Explains Migratory Performance of a Long-Distance Migrant. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 284, 1374. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1374
Baker, A., Gonzalez, P., Morrison, R.I.G. and Harrington, B.A. (2013) Red Knot (Calidris canutus). In: Poole, A., Ed., The Birds of North America Online Cornell Lab of Ornithology, America Online, Ithaca. https://doi.org/10.2173/bna.redkno.02
Niles, L.J., Sitters, H.P., Dey, A.D., Atkinson, P.W., Baker, A.J., Bennett, K.A., Carmona, R., Clark, K.E., Clark, N.A., Espoz, C., González, P.M., Harrington, B.A., Hernández, D.E., Kalasz, K.S., Lathrop, R.G., Matus, R.N., Minton, C.D.T., Morrison, R.I.G., Peck, M.K., Pitts, W., Robinson, R.A. and Serrano, I.L. (2008) Status of the Red Knot, Calidris canutus rufa, in the Western Hemisphere. Studies in Avian Biology, 36, 1-185.
Galbraith, H., Jones, R., Park, R., Clough, J., Herrod-Julius, S., Harrington, B. and Page, G. (2005) Global Climate Change and Sea Level Rise: Potential Losses of Intertidal Habitat for Shorebirds. USDA Forest Service Technical Report PSW-GTR-191.
Galbraith, H., DesRochers, D.W., Brown, S. and Reed, J.M. (2014) Predicting Vulnerabilities of North American Shorebirds to Climate Change. PLoS ONE, 9, e108899. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108899
NOAA (National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration) (2012) Communities: The U.S. Population Living in Coastal Watershed Counties. https://aambpublicoceanservice.blob.core.windows.net/oceanserviceprod/facts/coastal-population-report.pdf
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415416
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2017) Global Warming of 1.5 °C. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva.
Burger, J. and Niles, L. (2017) Shorebirds, Stakeholders, and Competing Claims to the Beach and Intertidal Habit in Delaware Bay, New Jersey, USA. Natural Science, 9, 181-205. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2017.96019
Burger, J. and Niles, L. (2104) Effects of Closure and Human Activities on Shorebirds at Coastal Brigantine Beach. Urban Ecosystems, 16, 657-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0269-9
Mu, T., Cal, S., Peng, H.-B., Hassell, C., Boyle, A., Zhang, Z., Piersma, T. and Wilcove, D. (in press) Evaluating Staging Habitat Quality to Advance the Conservation of a Declining Migratory Shorebird. Journal of Applied Ecology.
Baker, A.J., Gonzalez, P.M., Piersma, T., Niles, L.J., deLima, I., Nascimento, S., Atkinson, P.W., Collins, P., Clark, N.A., Minton, C.D.T., Peck, M.K. and Gates, S. (2004) Rapid Population Decline in Red Knots: Fitness Consequences of Refuelling Rates and Late Arrival in Delaware Bay. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 271, 875-882. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2663
Goss-Custard, J.D., Triplet, P., Sueur, R. and West, A.D. (2006) Critical Thresholds of Disturbance by People and Raptors in Foraging Wading Birds. Bioogical Conservation, 127, 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.015
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2014) Threatened Species Status for the Rufa Red Knot. Federal Register, 79, 73706-73748.
LeCorre, N., Peuziat, I., Brigand, L., Gélinaud, G. and Meur-Férec, C. (2013) Wintering Waterbirds and Recreationists in Natural Areas: A Sociological Approach to the Awareness of Bird Observation. Environmental Management, 52, 780-791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0118-5
Burger, J. and Tsipoura, N. (2019) Resident Status Influences Perceptions about Beach Resources, Valuation, and Restoration. Urban Ecosystems, 22, 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00860-y
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2014) Rufa Red Knot Background Information and Threat Assessment. Supplement to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Threatened Status for the Rufa Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa). [Docket No. FWS-R5-ES-2013-0097; RIN AY17] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pleasantville.
Niles, L., Burger, J., Porter, R.R., Dey, A.D., Minton, C.D.T., Gonzalez, P.M., Baker, A.J., Fox, J.W. and Gordon, C. (2010) First Results Using Light Level Geolocators to Track Red Knots in the Western Hemisphere Show Rapid and Long Intercontinental Flights and New Details of Migration Paths. Wader Study Group Bulletin, 117, 1-8.
Burger, J., Niles, L., Porter, R.R., Dey, A.H., Koch, S. and Gordon, C. (2012) Migrationg and Overwintering of Red Knots (Calidris canutus rufa) Nesting along the Atlantic Coast of the United States. Condor, 114, 302-313. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.110077
Burger, J., Niles, L. and Clark, K.E. (1997) Importance of Beach, Mudflat, and Marsh Habitats to Migrant Shorebirds on Delaware Bay. Biological Conservation, 79, 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00077-8
Burger, J., Niles, L., Jeitner, C. and Gochfeld, M. (2018) Habitat Risk: Use of Intertidal Flats by Foraging Red Knots (Calidris canutus rufa), Ruddy Turnstones, (Arenaria interpres), Semipalmated Sandpipers (Calidris pusilla), and Sanderling (Calidris alba) on Delaware Bay Beaches. Environmental Research, 165, 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.04.028
Tsipoura, N. and Burger, J. (1999) Shorebird Diet during Spring Migration Stop-Over on Delaware Bay. Condor, 101, 635-644. https://doi.org/10.2307/1370193
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) (1998) Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Horseshoe Crab. ASMFC, Washington DC.
Smith, J. (2020) Beach Restoration Improves Habitat Quality for American Horseshoe Crab and Shorebirds in the Delaware Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 645, 91-107. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13371
Brown, S., Gratto-Trevor, C., Porter, R., Weiser, E.L., Mizrahi, D., Bentzen, R., Boldenow, M., Clay, R., Freeman, S., Giroux, M., Kwon, E., Lank, D.B., et al. (2017) Migratory Connectivity of Semipalmated Sandpipers and Implications for Conservation. Condor, 119, 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-16-55.1
Unites States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2021) Draft Recovery Plan for the Rufa Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/05/12/2021-10064/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-andplants-draft-recovery-plan-for-the-rufa-red-knot
Burger, J., Carlucci, S.T., Jeitner, C.W. and Niles, L. (2007) Habitat Choice, Disturbance, and Management of Foraging Shorebirds at a Migratory Stopover. Journal of Coastal Research, 23, 1159-1166. https://doi.org/10.2112/04-0393.1
Burger, J. and Niles, L. (2015) Closure versus Voluntary Avoidance as a Method of Protecting Migrating Shorebirds on Beaches in New Jersey. Wader Study Group Bulletin, 120, 20-25.
Burger, J., Niles, L., Dey, A.D., Dillingham, T., Gates, A.S. and Smith, J. (2015) An Experiment to Examine How Red Knots Calidris canutus rufa and Other Shorebirds Respond to Oyster Culture at Reed’s Beach, Delaware Bay, New Jersey. Wader Study Group Bulletin, 122, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.18194/ws.00011
Burger, J. and Niles, L.J. (2012) Shorebirds and Stakeholders: Effects of Beach Closure and Human Activities on Shorebirds at a New Jersey Coastal Beach. Urban Ecosystems, 16, 657-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0269-9
Hevia, G.D. and Bala, L. (2018) The Role of Human Compliance for Management Actions to Protect Breeding Shorebirds in Coastal Ecosystems. Wader Study Group Bulletin, 125, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18194/ws.00110
Statistical Analysis Systems (SAS) (2020) Statistical Analysis. SAS, Cary.
Lafferty, K.D., Rodriguez, D.A. and Chapman, A. (2013) Temporal and Spatial Variation in Bird and Human Use of Beaches in southern California. SpringerPlus, 2, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-38
Batey, C. (2013) The Effectiveness of Management Options in Reducing Human Disturbance to Wetland and Coastal Birds. The Plymouth Student Scientist, 6, 240-354.
Faulhaber, C., Schwarzer, A., Malachowski, K., Rizkalla, C. and Cox, A. (2016) Effects of Human Disturbance on Shorebirds, Seabirds, and Wading Birds: Implications for Critical Wildlife Areas. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, IHR 2016-003.
Hamza, F. (2020) Impacts of Human Activities on Diversity of Wintering Waterbirds: Assessment in Mediterranean Coast Area. Ocean & Coastal Management, 198, Article ID: 105317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105317
Sutherland, W.J., Alves, J.A., Amano, T., Chang, C.H., Davidson, N.C., Finlayson, C.M., Gill, J.A., Gill, R.E.Jr., Gonzalez, P.M., Gunnarsson, T.G., et al. (2012) A Horizon Scanning Assessment of Current and Potential Future Threats to Migratory Shorebirds. Ibis, 154, 663-679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2012.01261.x
Mengak, L. and Dayer, A.A. (2020) Defining Human Disturbance to Shorebirds Using Manager and Scientist Input. Environmental Management, 65, 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01230-2
Michel, N.L., Saunders, S.P., Meehan, T.D. and Wilsey, C.B. (2021) Effects of Stewardship on Protected Area Effectiveness for Coastal Birds. Conservation Biology, 35, 1484-1495. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13698
Burger, J. and Dey, A. (in revision) Importance of Protection Efforts for Conservation of Red Knots (Calidris canutus rufa) and Other Shorebirds OSN Delaware Bay, New Jersey. Wader Study Bulletin. (In Revision)
Antos, M.J., Weston, M.A. and Priest, B. (2006) Factors Influencing Awareness of Community-Based Shorebird Conservation Projects in Australia. Applied Environmental Education and Conservation, 5, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15330150500452398