Description of the Nature Using the Models Developed in Euclidean Space
- 1 Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, A. V. Nikolaeva SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
Abstract
In elucidating the laws of matter motion, it is necessary also to take into account the subjective human possibilities to think and construct models. These possibilities are restricted to the framework of Euclidean space. No problems could arise during the development of the laws of classical science. However, it was established later on that in some areas it was rather difficult to describe the motion of the matter in terms of Euclidean models. In these cases, researchers either introduce a space of higher dimensionality, use complex numbers, or make some deformations of our habitual Euclidean space. Those were exactly the cases for which the pseudo-Euclidean, Hilbertian, reciprocal, micro-Euclidean and other spaces were proposed. Humans are able to think only in terms of Euclidean space. So, to provide a correct description of unusual motion of matter, the necessity arises to transform the information into the understandable Euclidean space. The operators suitable for these purposes are Lorentz transformations, Schrodinger equation, the integral transformations of Fourier and Weierstrass, etc. The features of information transformations between different spaces are illustrated with the examples from the areas of X-ray structural analysis and quantum physics.
- Prokhorov, A.M. (1971) Big Soviet Encyclopedia (Bolshaya Sovetskaya Entsiklopedia). Sovetskaya Entsiklopedia, Moscow. (In Russian)
- Osipova, J.S. (2011) Big Russian Encyclopedia (Bolshaya Russkaya Entsiklopedia). Bolschay Rossiyskaya Enciklopedia, Moscow. (In Russian)
- Prokhorov, A.M. (1988) Phisical Encyclopedia (Fisicheskaya Entsiklopedia). Sovetskay Enciklopedia, Moscow. (In Russian)
- Tipler, P.A. and Llewellyn, R.A. (2007) Modern Physics. Vol. 1. Transl. E.M. Leikina, Mir, Moscow, 494.
- Feynman, R., Leighton, R. and Sands, M. (1978) Feynman Lectures on Physics. Vol. 2. Transl. J.A. Smorodinsky, Mir, Moscow.
- Machotka, R. (2018) Euclidean Model of Space and Time. Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 1215-1249. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jmp https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2018.96073
- Peschevitsky, B.I. (1989) Relativistic Attraction. Chemistry and Life, No. 11, 87-89. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.2307/3378615
- Stabnikov, P.A. (2018) The Framework in Which Matter Develops. (Ramki v kotorykh razvivaetsia material). Palmarium Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, Germany. (In Russian)
- Tavokol, R. (2009) Geometry of Spacetime and Finsler Geometry. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 24, 1678-1685. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X09045224
- Hohmann, M. (2013) Extensions of Lorentzian Spacetime Geometry: From Finsler to Cartan and Vice Versa. Physical Review D, 87, Article ID: 124034. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.124034
- Brill, D. and Jacobson, T. (2006) Spacetime and Euclidean Geometry. General Relativity and Gravitation, 38, 643-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-006-0254-9
- Jonsson, R. (2001) Embedding Spacetime via a Geodesically Equivalent Metric of Euclidean Signature. General Relativity and Gravitation, 33, 1207-1235. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012037418513
- Stabnikov, P.A. (2019) A New Geometric Approach to Explain the Features of the Micro World. Natural Science, SCIRP, 11, 246-351. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2019.117024
- Solodovnikov, S.F. (2014) The Universality of Crystallography. Journal of Structural Chemistry, 55, S5-S13. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022476614070014
- Smolegovsky, A.M. (2009) U.L. Bragg and His Role in the Creation of Structural Crystal Chemistry. Instityt Istorii Estestvosnania Tekhniki, PAN, Moscow, 199. (In Russian)