The Importance of Preserving Birds and Their Habitats at Hanford Site and Oak Ridge Reservation: Information and Communication Tools for Governments, Local and Diverse Communities and Others — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Importance of Preserving Birds and Their Habitats at Hanford Site and Oak Ridge Reservation: Information and Communication Tools for Governments, Local and Diverse Communities and Others
Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA
,
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute and Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Piscataway, USA
,
Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA
,
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
,
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
,
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
1 Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA
2 Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute and Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Piscataway, USA
3 Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA
4 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
The Department of Energy (DOE) has one of the largest environmental remediation tasks in the world, cleaning up the radiologic and toxic contamination legacy of nuclear weapons production. DOE has committed itself to accomplish remediation “while protecting human health and the environment”. Many DOE sites are huge, encompassing habitats that are ecologically valuable because they have been protected from human disturbance for 70 years or more. Yet information on the importance of DOE lands for protecting specific ecological resources is often buried in volumes of data. In this paper, we examine the importance of DOE lands as habitats for birds using two sites as examples: the Hanford Site and Oak Ridge Reservation. Our overall goal was to provide a model for communication of key information useful for the public and decision-makers. Birds are conspicuous and familiar features of the landscape, and bird populations are important indicators of habitat quality. As future land use plans evolve, birds can convey important messages about habitat uniqueness and conservation importance and recreational values of designating DOE land for conservation, but only if they are in accessible formats. At the semi-arid Hanford site, shrub-steppe is an important habitat outside the Columbia River corridor. At the wet Oak Ridge Reservation eastern deciduous forest, interior forest is a particularly important habitat. There are different groups of bird species dependent on each habitat. We use two methods for each habitat: 1) a comparison of historical written records and 2) a comparison of land use/land cover data. Habitat loss through development, fragmentation, and degradation is one of the most important causes of avian decline. Importantly, we present the data in a manner suitable for discussion among diverse audiences regarding future use of sites now undergoing remediation. The Hanford Site has recorded 205 bird species, including shrub-steppe species of regional importance. The Oak Ridge Reservation has recorded 213 species of birds, including Neotropical migrants of international concern. In both cases, their respective habitat is key to protection of the unique avian assemblages, and there is a higher percentage of these habitats on the DOE lands than in the surrounding habitats. Our analysis also concludes that these habitats that are of high importance to the rare and declining avian assemblages are mostly increasing on the DOE sites as the once agrarian landscape has reverted to more natural habitat. Since acquisition, DOE has developed about 10% of the land for nuclear and industrial activities, leaving the rest of it as a security buffer for the nuclear production mission. The tables provided in this manuscript can serve as valuable tools in communicating the importance of these lands and protecting these lands for surrounding communities. We commend the DOE for its protection of ecological resources for the regions and the Nation, applaud their mechanisms for ecological protection, and recommend that more of each site’s respective unique and important habitats be designated as preserved in perpetuity as valued ecological resources. This designation entails communicating with Tribes, communities, government agencies and organizations, and the public about the ecological value of their protected lands.
Lubbert, R. and Chu, J. (2007) Challenges to Cleaning up Formerly Used Defense Sites in the Twenty-First Century. Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, 11, 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffej.3330110303
Department of Energy (DOE) (2015) Environmental Management: 2015 Year in Review. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/06/f32/2015-YIR-05122016.pdf
Department of Energy (DOE) (1994a) Stewards of a National Resource. (DOE/FM-0002), Office of Energy Research, Department of Energy, Washington DC.
Crowley, K.D. and Ahearne, J.F. (2002) Managing the Environmental Legacy of U.S. Nuclear-Weapons Production. American Scientist, 90, 514-523. https://doi.org/10.1511/2002.6.514
Department of Energy (DOE) (2002) A Review of the Environmental Management Program. (Top to Bottom Review Team). Department of Energy, Washington DC.
Department of Defense (DOD) (1994) Coming in from the Cold: Military Heritage in the Cold War. https://denix.osd.mil/legacy/cr-legacy-project-deliverables/fy1992/fy1992/coming-in-from-the-cold-military-heritage-in-the-cold-war-report-legacy-92-ta0010/
Sheehy, D.J. and Vik, S.F. (2003) Natural Resource Damage Claims: Potential DOD Liabilities and Mitigation Opportunities. Federal Facilities and Environment Journal, 14, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffej.10079
Burger, J. (2019) A Framework for Increasing Sustainability and Reducing Risk to Ecological Resources through Integration of Remediation Planning and Implementation. Environmental Research, 172, 586-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.036
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D., Brown, K.G., Bliss, L.S., Bunn, A., Clarke, J.H., Mayer, H.J. and Salisbury, J. (2019) The Cost of Delaying Remediation on Human, Ecological, and Eco-Cultural Resources: Considerations for the Department of Energy: A Methodological Framework. Science of the Total Environment, 649, 1054-1064.
Dale, V.H. and Parr, P.D. (1998) Preserving DOE’s Research Parks. Issues Science Technology, 14, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.232
Brown, K.S. (1998) The Great DOE, Land Rush. Science, 282, 616-617.
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Bunn, A., Downs, J., Jeitner, C., Pittfield, T., Salisbury, J. and Kosson, D. (2017) A Methodology to Evaluate Ecological Resources and Risk Using Two Case Studies at the Department of Energy’s Hanford Site. Environmental Management, 59, 357-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0798-8
KeywordsEcological RiskBirdsRisk Communication
Department of Energy (DOE) (1994) National Environmental Research Parks. Office of Energy Research, Department of Energy, Washington DC.
Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. (1986) Landscape Ecology. Wiley, New York.
Cvitanovic, C., McDonald, J. and Hobday, A.J. (2016) From Science to Action: Principles for Undertaking Environmental Research That Enables Knowledge Exchange and Evidence-Based Decision-Making. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 864-874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.038
Greenberg, M., Powers, C.W., Mayer, H. and Kosson, D. (2007) Root Causes of Unsatisfactory Performance of Large and Complex Remediation Projects: Lessons Learned from the United States Department of Energy Environmental Management Programs. Remediation, 18, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.20153
Laurence, W.F., Camargo, J.L.C., Fearnside, P.M., Lovejoy, T.E., Williamson, G.B., Mexquita, R.C.F., Meyer, C.F.J., Bobrowler, P.E.D. and Laurance, S.G.W. (2018) An Amazonian Rainforest and Its Fragments as a Laboratory of Global Change. Biological Reviews Cambridge Philosophical Society, 93, 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12343
Leakey, R. and Lewin, R. (1996). The Sixth Extinction: Biodiversity and Its Survival. Weidenfield & Nicholson, London.
Barnosky, A.D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G.O.U., Swartz, B., Quental, T.B., Marshall, C., McGuire, J.O., et al. (2011) Has the Earth’s Sixth Mass Extinction Already Arrived? Nature, 471, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09678
Kolbert, E. (2014) The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. Henry Holt & Co., New York.
Department of Energy (DOE) (2017) Hanford Site Biological Resources Management Plan. DOE/RL 96-31 Revision 2 (Dated 2017) DOE, Richland Operations, Richland.
Greenberg, M. and Lowrie, K. (2001) A Proposed Model for Community Participation and Risk Communication for a DOE-Led Stewardship Program. Federal Facilities and the Environment Journal, 2001, 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffej.3330120113
National Research Council (NRC) (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
National Research Council (NRC) (2000) Ecological Indicators for the Nation. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
National Research Council (NRC) (2008) Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
Kroodsma, R.L. (1984) Effect of Edge on Breeding Forest Bird Species. Wilson Bulletin, 96, 426-436.
Temple, S.A. and Cary, J.R. (1988) Modeling Dynamics of Habitat-Interior Bird Populations in Fragmented Landscapes. Conservation Biology, 2, 340-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00198.x
Gochfeld, M., Burger, J., Powers, C. and Kosson, D. (2015) Land Use Planning Scenarios for Contaminated Land: Comparing EPA, State, Federal and Tribal Approaches-15642. Waste Management Symposium Proceedings, Phoenix, March 2015, 1-16.
Davidson, M.D. (2013) On the Relation between Ecosystem Services, Intrinsic Value, Existence Value and Economic Valuation. Ecological Economics, 95, 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.002
Harris, S.G. and Harper, B.L. (2000) Using Eco-Cultural Dependency Webs in Risk Assessment and Characterizations of Risks to Tribal Health and Cultures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2, 91-100.
Burger, J. (2011) Stakeholders and Scientists: Achieving Implementable Solutions to Energy and Environmental Issues. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8813-3
Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP) (2018) Hanford Risk Review Final Report. CRESP. Vanderbilt University, Nashville. http://www.cresp.org/hanford
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D.S., Brown, K.G., Salisbury, J. and Jeitner, C. (2020) A Paradigm for Protecting Ecological Resources Following Remediation as a Function of Future Land Use Designations: A Case Study of the Department of Energy’s Hanford Site. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192, 181-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8084-x
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D., Brown, K. and Cortes, M. (2022) Development of a Method to Evaluate Ecological Risk: Oak Ridge Reservation as a Case Study. WM2022, Phoenix, March 2022, 10 p.
Gochfeld, M., Burger, J., Kosson, D. and Brown, K. (2022) An Approach for Evaluating Risk and Communicating Risk to the Public Using East Tennessee Technology Park at Oak Ridge. WM2022, Phoenix, March 2022, 12 p.
Department of Energy (DOE) (2020) Hanford Annual Site Environmental Report for Calendar Year 2020. Department of Energy, Richland.
Department of Energy (DOE) (2020) Oak Ridge Reservation Annual Site Environmental Report 2020. U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge.
Landeen, D.S., Johnson, A.R. and Mitchel, R.M. (1993). Status of Birds at the Hanford Site in Southeastern Washington. Department of Energy, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland. https://pdw.hanford.gov/download/4e01bc65-c6dd-4a8e-8a74-ee8c30e03ed6
ORNL (2012) Birds of the Oak Ridge Reservation. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. https://nerp.ornl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/orr_birds-2012.pdf
National Land Use Cover Database (2016) National Land Use/Land Cover Database. USGS, Washington DC.
WDWF (2022) Threatened and Endangered Species. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington DC. https://wdfw.wa.gov/species-habitats/at-risk/listed
Department of Energy (DOE) (2001) Hanford Site Biological Resources Management Plan. Appendix D: Hanford’s Biological Resources: Geographical Information System-Based Resource Maps, Species of Concern Data Tables, and Their Technical Basis. DOE/RL 96-32. DOE, Richland Operations, Richland.
Sackschewsky, M.R. and Downs, J.L. (2001) Vascular Plants of the Hanford Site. PNNL 13688. Pacific National Northwest Laboratory, Richland. https://doi.org/10.2172/789922
Littlefield, C.D. and Ivey, G.L. (2002) Washington State Recovery Plan for the Sandhill Crane. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington DC, 71 p. https://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/00396
Department of Energy (1999) Final Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/768420-final-hanford-comprehensive-land-use-plan-environmental-impact-statement-hanford-site-richland-washington
Department of Energy (1980) Oak Ridge Reservation Land-Use Plan. DOE/ORO-748 (Rev 1). https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/5239233
Department of Energy (2021) East Tennessee Technology Park. Office of Environmental Management. https://www.energy.gov/orem/cleanup-sites/east-tennessee-technology-park
Department of Energy (2021) New Growth Following Fire Devastation at Hanford’s Gable Mountain Area. Environmental Management. https://www.energy.gov/em/articles/new-growth-following-fire-devastation-hanfords-gable-mountain-area
Endangered Species Act (ESA). Public Law-205, as Amended, 16USC 1513 et seq. (1973). https://www.congress.gov/bill/93rd-congress/senate-bill/1983/text
Teder, T., Moora, M., Roosaluste, E., Zobel, M., Partel, U., Koljalg, M. and Zobel, M. (2007) Monitoring of Biological Diversity: A Common-Ground Approach. Conservational Biology, 21, 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00575.x
Azerrad, J.M., Divers, K.A., Livingston, M.F., Teske, M.S., Ferguson, H.L. and David, J.L. (2011) Site Specific Management: How to Avoid and Minimize Impacts of Development to Shrub-Steppe. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington DC. https://www2.clark.wa.gov/files/dept/community-planning/shoreline-master-program/proposal-comments-received/futurewise-cd-1/fish-&-wildlife-habitat/psh-management-recs/wdfw01335.pdf
Davis, S.K. and Sealy, S.G. (2000) Cowbird Parasitism and Nest Predation in Fragmented Grasslands of Southwestern Manitoba. In: Smith, J.N.M., Cook, T.L., Rothstein, S.I., Robinson, S.K., and Sealy, S.G., Eds., Ecology and Management of Cowbirds and Their Hosts, University of Texas Press, Austin, 220-228. https://doi.org/10.7560/777385-028
Farrell, S.L., Morrison, M.L., Wilkins, R.N., Slack, R.D. and Campomizzi, A.J. (2011) Brown-Headed Cowbird Parasitism on Endangered Species: Relationships with Neighboring Avian Species. Western North American Naturalist, 70, 474-482. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.070.0407
Department of Energy (DOE) (2013) Hanford Site Biological Resources Management Plant. U.S. DOE, Richland, Washington DC.
Giffen, N.R., Evans, J.W. and Parr, P.D. (2012). Wildlife Management Plan for the Oak Ridge Reservation. ORNL/TM-2012/387, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge.
Parr, P.D., Byrd, G.S., Johnston, J.W. and Giffen, N.R. (2015) Forest Management Plan for the DOE Oak Ridge Reservation: An Interdisciplinary Approach for Managing a Heritage Resource. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/TM-2015/98, Oak Ridge.
Giffen, N.R., Wade, D.C. and Mueller, M. (2012) Interior Forest Areas of the Oak Ridge Environmental Research Park. ORNL/TM-2012/388, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge.
Gephart, R.E. (2010) A Short History of Waste Management at the Hanford Site. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 35, 298-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.03.032
Department of Energy (2015) History of the Oak Ridge EM Program. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/05/f22/orem_accomplishments_timeline.pdf
Sandifer, P.A., Sutteon-Grier, A. and Ward, B.P. (2015) Exploring Connections among Nature, Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, and Human Health and Well-Being: Opportunities to Enhance Health and Biodiversity Conservation. Ecosystem Services, 12, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.007