From Cosmological Reality to Physical Perception: A Philosophical Framework
- 1 Universal Theory Research Centre, Jaipur, India
Abstract
The process by which an incoming electromagnetic activation becomes a physically perceived reality remains an open ontological question. The present work proposes a hierarchical cosmological framework in which physical reality emerges from a more fundamental cosmological level, much as biological, psychological, and intellectual realities emerge from their respective substrates. The work proceeds from the philosophical assumption that nature is not partial and therefore that the different levels of reality should exhibit continuity in their modes of emergence and realization. Within this framework, electromagnetic waves are interpreted as energy-capable cosmological fields propagating through a cosmological space-fabric, becoming physical energy upon reception by a physical entity. This transition is viewed as parallel to the way sensing-capable physical energies give rise to biological sensations, although the incoming activation itself is not yet the realized phenomenon. The paper examines the bridge between lower-level capability and higher-level realization. In doing so, it offers alternative interpretations of the structure of space, electromagnetic propagation, and the distinction between E- and B-fields. The framework is limited to pre-physical reality and therefore does not affect the empirical results or the mathematical structure of Maxwellian electromagnetism. Rather, it offers an ontological interpretation of the processes proposed to precede physical perception.
- van Fraassen, B.C. (1980) The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press.
- Ladyman, J. and Ross, D. (2007) Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276196.001.0001
- Anderson, P.W. (1972) More Is Different. Science , 177, 393-396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.177.4047.393
- von Bertalanffy, L. (1968) General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller.
- Jackson, J.D. (1999) Classical Electrodynamics. 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons.
- Clayton, P. and Davies, P. (2006) The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion. Oxford University Press.
- Mou, B. (2016) How Constructive Engagement in Doing Philosophy Comparatively Is Possible. Journal of World Philosophies , 1, 148-160.
- Bartha, P. (2019) By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments. 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press.
- Agrawal, P.K. (2021) An Alternative Approach toward the Origin of the Universe. Philosophy and Cosmology , 27, 5-21. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/27/1
- Agrawal, P.K. (2020) Psychological Model of Phonosemantics. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 49, 453-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09701-y
- Gautama (1913) The Nyāya Sūtras of Gotama. S. Vidyabhusan, Trans., Panini Office.
- Whittaker, E.T. (1951) A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity. Vol. 1, Thomas Nelson and Sons.
- Michelson, A.A. and Morley, E.W. (1887) On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether. American Journal of Science , 3, 333-345. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.s3-34.203.333
- Agrawal, P.K. (2023) Unified Understanding of Cosmological Energy Fields: Exploring Gravitation, Repulsion, and More. Natural Science , 15, 263-284. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2023.1511020
- Einstein, A. (1920) Relativity: The Special and the General Theory. R. W. Lawson, Trans., Henry Holt.
- Agrawal, P.K. (2024) Structure of Space Fabric: Meaning of Emptiness. In: Contemporary Perspective on Science , Technology and Research , Vol. 6, B P International, 131-150. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/cpstr/v6/2182b