Distribution and chromosomal variation in the scincid lizard genus <i>Lygosoma</i> (Reptilia: Squamata) in Thailand
- 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- 2 Department of Agricultural Technique, Faculty of Agricultural Development and Resources Management, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand
- 3 Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Abstract
The distribution of the scincid lizard genus Lygosoma in Thailand was studied and recorded on a map. In addition, the studies on chromosomes of Lygosoma bowringii , L . khoratense and L . quadrupes were examined. The karyotype was determined for each individual on the basis of at least 10 well spread cells. L . bowringii and L . khoratense showed the same diploid number of 2N = 32 and identical chromosome morphology. The fundamental number (N.F.) equals 48. The karyotype of L . quadrupes is almost identical to that of L . bowringii , but differs from the latter in having a telocentric pair 9. Thus, the N.F. value equal to 46. No sex chromosome heteromorphisms is evident.
- Matsui, M. (1992) Systematic zoology, Vol. 9, vertebrates IIb2, Reptilia II. Nakayama-Shoten, Tokyo.
- Zug, G.R., Vitt, L.J. and Caldwell, J.P. (2001) Herpetology. Academic Press, London.
- Nabhitabhata, J., Chanard, T. and Chuaynkern, Y. (2000) Checklist of amphibians and reptiles in Thailand. Office of Environmental Policy and Planning Bangkok, 80-92.
- Green, D.M. and Sessions, S.K. (1991) Nomenclature for chromosomes. In: Green, D.M. and Sessions, S.K., Eds., Amphibian Cytogenetics and Evolution, Academic Press, San Diego, 431-432.
- King, M. (1981) Chromosome change and speciation in lizards. In: Atchley, W.R. and Woodruff, D.S., Eds., Evolution and Speciation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 262-285.
- Caputo, V., Odierna, G. and Aprea, G. (1994) A chromosomal study of Eumeces and Scincus, primitive members of the Scincidae (Reptilia, Squamata). Bolletino di Zoologia, 61, 155-162. doi:10.1080/11250009409355876