The weighted quadratic index of biodiversity for pairs of species: a generalization of Rao’s index
- 1
- 2
Abstract
The distribution of biodiversity at multiple sites of a region has been traditionally investigated through the additive partitioning of the regional biodiversity, called γ-diversity, into the average within-site biodiversity or α-diversity, and the biodiversity among sites, or β-diversity. The standard additive partitioning of diversity requires the use of a measure of diversity which is a concave function of the relative abundance of species, like the Shannon entropy or the Gini- Simpson index, for instance. When a phylogenetic distance between species is also taken into account, Rao’s quadratic index has been used as a measure of dissimilarity. Rao’s index, however, is not a concave function of the distribution of relative abundance of either individual species or pairs of species and, consequently, only some nonstandard additive partitionings of diversity have been given using this index. The objective of this paper is to show that the weighted quadratic index of biodiversity, a generalization of the weighted Gini-Simpson index to the pairs of species, is a concave function of the joint distribution of the relative abundance of pairs of species and, therefore, may be used in the standard additive partitioning of diversity instead of Rao’s index. The replication property of this new measure is also discussed.
- Whittaker, R.H. (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21, 213-251. doi:10.2307/1218190
- Whittaker, R.H. (1977) Evolution of species diversity in land communities. In: Hecht, M.K. and Steere, B.W.N.C., Eds., Evolutionary Biology, Plenum Press, New York, 10, 1-67.
- MacArthur, R.H. (1965) Patterns of species diversity. Biological Review, 40, 510-533. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1965.tb00815.x
- MacArthur, R.H. and Wilson, E.O. (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- Lande, R. (1996) Statistics and partitioning of species diversity and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos, 76, 5-13. doi:10.2307/3545743
- Shannon, C.E. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423, 623-656.
- Gini, C. (1912) Variabilità e mutabilità. In: Pizzetti, E. and Salvemini, T., Eds., Rome: Libreria Eredi Virgilio Veschi, Memorie di Metodologica Statistica.
- Simpson, E.H. (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688. doi:10.1038/163688a0
- Rao, C.R. (1982) Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: a unified approach. Theoretical Population Biology, 21, 24-43. doi:10.1016/0040-5809(82)90004-1
- Jost, L. (2007) Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology, 88, 2427-2439. doi:10.1890/06-1736.1
- Jost, L. (2009) Mismeasuring biological diversity: Response to Hoffmann and Hoffmann. Ecological Economics, 68, 925-928. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.015
- Jost, L., DeVries, P., Walla, T., Greeney, H., Chao, A. and Ricotta, C. (2010) Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses. Diversity and Distributions, 16, 65-76. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00626.x
- Guiasu, R.C. and Guiasu, S. (2010) The Rich-Gini- Simpson quadratic index of biodiversity. Natural Science, 2, 1130-1137. doi:10.4236/ns.2010.210140
- Guiasu, R.C. and Guiasu, S. (2010) New measures for comparing the species diversity found in two or more habitats. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 18, 691-720. doi:10.1142/S0218488510006763
- Pavoine, S., Ollier, S. and Pontier, D. (2005) Measuring diversity from dissimilarities with Rao’s quadratic entropy: Are any dissimilarities suitable? Theoretical Popu- lation Biology, 67, 231-239. doi:10.1016/j.tpb.2005.01.004