Risk Based Technology Qualification Method for HPHT Well
- 1 Petro China Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla, China
- 2 Petro China Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla, China
- 3 Petro China Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla, China
- 4 Petro China Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla, China
- 5 College of Mechanical Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China
Abstract
With the increasing demand for new technologies in HPHT (high pressure high temperature) wells, more and more attention has been paid to the system of technical qualifications. Most established norms, standards and recommended practices are written in prescribed formats, setting out methods, procedures and acceptance criteria for product design, manufacture and testing. However, established norms, standards or recommended practices may not adequately cover new technologies or applications. The technical qualification system is established in this paper, which can identify the potential failure modes and some activities in order to control the uncertainties and increase confidence of using new technology. A risk-based technical qualification system is used to assess non-traditional operations. It includes following seven main steps: system breakdown, technology assessment and classification, technical novelty, failure model and risk analysis, risk-based qualification planning and participation level development. The core of technical qualification system is to understand the ways and causes of system failure, and to carry out corresponding activities to provide evidence that the system will not fail. Through the technical identification process, the detailed equipment/operation specifications and identification requirements have been formulated. Different levels of participation are assigned for each eligibility activity, depending on the hazard and risk. It is proved that the application of the technical qualification principle in the systematic evaluation and control of the risks of new technologies or new applications is successful. In HPHT wells in particular, operators can move from a reactive approach to a proactive approach.
- Vgnes, B. (2008) Well-Integrity Issues Offshore Norway. SPE/IADC 112535. https://doi.org/10.2118/112535-MS
- American Petroleum Institute. (2013) API 17TR8, High-Pressure High-Temperature (HPHT) Design Guidelines. API, Washington DC.
- Reliability of Well Completion Equipment—Main Report, Well Master, Exprosoft, 2013.
- The United Kingdom Offshore Oil and Gas Industry Association Limited. Well Integrity Guidelines, Issue 1. London, 2012.
- American Petroleum Institute. (2012) API RP 90-2, Annular Casing Pressure Management for Onshore Wells. API, Washington DC.
- International Organization for Standardization. (2013) ISO 16530-2 Well Integrity—Part 2: Well Integrity for the Operational Phase. Switzerland.
- Norwegian Oil Industry Association and Federation of Norwegian Manufacturing Industries. NORSOK D-010 Rev. 4, Well Integrity in Drilling and Well Operations. Strandveien, 2013.
- OLF No. 117, Recommended Guidelines for Well Integrity. Strandveien, 2011.
- DNV Recommended Practice, DNV-RP-A203, July 2013, Technology Qualification.