Main Features of a Complete Ultrasonic Measurement Model: Formal Aspects of Modeling of Both Transducers Radiation and Ultrasonic Flaws Responses
- 1 CEA, LIST, Department of Imaging & Simulation for Nondestructive Testing, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
- 2 CEA, LIST, Department of Imaging & Simulation for Nondestructive Testing, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
Abstract
This paper aims at describing the theoretical fundamentals of a reciprocity-based ultrasonic measurement model. This complete inspection simulation can be decomposed in two modeling steps, one dedicated to transducer radiation and one to flaw scattering and echo synthesis. The physical meaning of the input/output signals used in these two modeling tools is defined and the theoretical principles of both field calculation and echo computation models are then detailed. The influence on the modeling results of some changes in the simulated configuration (as the incident angle) or some input signal parameters (like the frequency) are studied: it is thus theoretically established that the simulated results can be compared between each other in terms of amplitude for numerous applications when changing some inspection parameters in the simulation but that a calibration for echo calculation is generally required.
- G. S. Kino, “The Application of Reciprocity Theory to Scattering of Acoustic Waves by Flaws,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 49, No. 6, 1978, pp. 3190-99. doi:10.1063/1.325312
- B. A. Auld, “General Electromechanical Reciprocity Relations Applied to the Calculation of Elastic Wave Scattering Coefficients,” Wave Motion, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1979, pp. 3-10. doi:10.1016/0165-2125(79)90020-9
- R. B. Thompson and T.A. Gray, “A Model Relating Ultrasonic Scattering Measurements to Unbounded Medium Scattering Amplitudes,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 74, No. 4, 1989, pp. 1279-1290. doi:10.1121/1.390045
- L. W. Schmerr, Jr. and J. S. Song, “Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation Systems: Models and Measurements,” Springer, New York, 2007. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-49063-2
- CIVA Software Website. http://www-civa.cea.fr
- N. Gengembre and A. Lhémery, “Pencil Method in Elastodynamics. Application to Ultrasonic Field Computation,” Ultrasonics, Vol. 38, No. 1-8, 2000, pp. 495-499. doi:10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00068-2
- N. Gengembre and A. Lhémery, “Calculation of Wideband Ultrasonic Fields Radiated by Water-Coupled Transducers into Heterogeneous and Anisotropic Media,” Review of Progress in QNDE, Vol. 19, 2000, pp. 977-984.
- R. Chapman, “Ultrasonic Scattering from Smooth Flat Cracks: An Elastodynamic Kirchhoff Diffraction Theory,” CEGB Report, North Western Region NDT Applications Centre, 1982.
- M. Darmon, P. Calmon and B. Bele, “An Integrated Model to Simulate the Scattering of Ultrasounds by Inclusions in Steels,” Ultrasonics, Vol. 42, No. 1-9, 2004, pp. 237-241. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.015
- M. Darmon, S. Chatillon, S. Mahaut, L. Fradkin and A. Gautesen, “Simulation of Disoriented Flaws in a TOFD Technique Configuration Using GTD Approach,” 34th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, 2008.
- V. Zernov, L. Fradkin and M. Darmon, “A Refinement of the Kirchhoff Approximation to the Scattered Elastic Fields,” Ultrasonics, Vol. 52, No. 17, 2012, pp. 830-835. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2011.09.008
- C. C. Mow and Y. H. Pao, “The Diffraction of Elastic Waves and Dynamic Stress Concentrations,” Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, 1971.
- C. Ying and R. Truell, “Scattering of a Plane Longitudinal Wave by a Spherical Obstacle in an Isotropically Elastic Solid,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 27, No. 9, 1956, p. 1086. doi:10.1063/1.1722545