Research on the Impact of Employee Stock Ownership Plan on Enterprise Innovation
- 1 School of Accounting, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China
Abstract
This paper selects the 2014-2018 Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies as a sample to study the impact of employee stock ownership plans on corporate innovation and finds that compared with companies that have not implemented employee stock ownership plans, the implementation of employee stock ownership plans can promote corporate innovation. The mechanism inspection found that employees mainly play the role of “executors” in enterprise innovation, and they have not promoted enterprise innovation investment. In addition, based on the characteristics of employees, this article finds that when the growth rate of employees is low and the composition of highly educated employees is relatively high, the implementation of employee stock ownership plans will have a greater impact on corporate innovation. This article enriches the research on the influencing factors of enterprise innovation with employees as the main body, and has certain guiding significance for improving the design of employee stock ownership system and promoting enterprise innovation and development.
- Bradley, D., Kim, I., & Tian, X. (2016). Do Unions Affect Innovation?. Management Science, 63, 2251-2271. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2414
- Chang, X., Fu, K., Low, A. et al. (2015). Non-Executive Employee Stock Options and Corporate Innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 115, 168-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.002
- Chen, C. Y., Chen, Y. Y., Hsu, P. H., & Podolski, E. J. (2016). Be Nice to Your Innovators: Employee Treatment and Corporate Innovation Performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 78-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.06.001
- Hochberg, Y. V., & Lindsey, L. (2010). Incentives, Targeting, and Firm Performance: An Analysis of Non-Executive Stock Options. The Review of Financial Studies, 23, 4148-4186. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq093
- Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2003). Coming Up Short on Nonfinancial Performance Measurement. Harvard Business Review, 81, 88-95.
- Kim, E. H., & Ouimet, P. (2014). Broad-Based Employee Stock Ownership: Motives and Outcomes. The Journal of Finance, 69, 1273-1319. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12150
- Kong, D. M., Wang, Y. N., & Dai, Y. H. (2015). Why Does the Listing of Companies Reduce Production Efficiency?—A Study Based on the Perspective of Institutional Incentives. Financial Research, No. 7, 76-97.
- Li, L. M., & Wang, C. (2017). Tax Burden, Innovation Capability and Enterprise Upgrading: Empirical Evidence from Companies Listed on the “New Third Board”. Economic Research, 52, 119-134.
- Manso, G. (2011). Motivating Innovation. The Journal of Finance, 66, 1823-1860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01688.x
- Meng, Q. B., Li, X. Y., & Zhang, P. (2019). Can Employee Stock Ownership Plans Promote Corporate Innovation?—Empirical Evidence Based on the Perspective of Corporate Employees. Management World, 35, 209-228.
- Oyer, P., & Schaefer, S. (2005). Why Do Some Firms Give Stock Options to All Employees? An Empirical Examination of Alternative Theories. Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 99-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.03.004
- Reeg, C. (2013). Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Upgrading in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Literature Review. Discussion Paper.
- Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score. The American Statistician, 39, 33-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2683903