Comparative Analysis of Energy Performance for Residential Wall Systems with Conventional and Innovative Insulation Materials: A Case Study
- 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
- 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Abstract
This study was focused on the simulation of energy performance for residential buildings incorporating different types of insulation materials. The ener gy consumption of residential buildings in the U.S. plays a significant role in the total annual energy consumption, and using insulation materials of higher performances is one of the most effective ways to reduce the building energy consumption. In this study , the building energy simulation was performed in BEopt for a typical residential house in the U.S. with several different types of insulation materials. The results show that adding insulation materials can significantly improve the building energy performance. The polyisocyanurate performed the best among the conventional insulation materials and had an annualized source energy saving of 37% in Pittsburgh. Vacuum-Insulated Panels had the best performance among all types of materials discussed in this study and show ed annualized source energy of 41% in Pittsburgh. Phase Change Material was found to be the most effective way to particularly reduce the cooling energy use.
- Cooperman, A., Dieckmann, J. and Brodrick, J. (2011) Home Envelope Retrofits. ASHRAE Journal, 53, 82-85.
- Cellulose Insulation Manufacturers Association of Canada (2009) General Installation Guidelines for Cellulose Fiber Insulation (CFI). 2nd Edition.
- Ojanen, T. and Laaksonen, J. (2016) Hygrothermal Performance Benefits of the Cellulose Fibre Thermal Insulation Structures. 41st IAHS World Congress: Sustainability and Innovation for the Future, Coimbra, 13-16 September 2016, 10.
- Papadopoulos, A.M. (2005) State of the Art in Thermal Insulation Materials and Aims for Future Developments. Energy and Buildings, 37, 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.05.006
- Cabeza, L.F., et al. (2010) Experimental Study on the Performance of Insulation Materials in Mediterranean Construction. Energy and Buildings, 42, 630-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.10.033
- Kalnæs, S.E. and Jelle, B.P. (2014) Vacuum Insulation Panel Products: A State-of-the-Art Review and Future Research Pathways. Applied Energy, 116, 355-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.032
- Mujeebu, M.A. and Noman Ashraf, A.A. (2016) Energy Performance and Economic Viability of Nano Aerogel Glazing and Nano Vacuum Insulation Panel in Multi-Story Office Building. Energy, 113, 949-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.136
- Filate, S.S. (2014) Investigation of an Energy Refurbishment Concept for Office Building Using Nanogel Aerogel Insulation Plaster and Replaced Windows by Building Simulation.
- Casini, M. (2014) Smart Materials and Nanotechnology for Energy Retrofit of Historic Buildings. International Conference on Advances in Civil, Structural and Construction Engineering, Rome, 7-8 June 2014, 28-37.
- Masoso, O.T. and Grobler, L.J. (2008) A New and Innovative Look at Anti-Insulation Behaviour in Building Energy Consumption. Energy and Buildings, 40, 1889-1894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.04.013
- Idris, Y.M. and Mae, M. (2017) Anti-Insulation Mitigation by Altering the Envelope Layers’ Configuration. Energy and Buildings, 141, 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.025