Multi-level multi-scale resource selection models using machine learning were compared and contrasted for generating predictive maps of jaguar habitat ( Panthera onca) in the Brazilian Pantanal. Multiple spatial scales and temporal movement levels were run within several analytical modeling frameworks for comparison. Included in the analysis were multi-scale raster grains (30 m, 90 m, 180 m, 360 m, 720 m, 1440 m) and GPS collaring temporal movement levels (point, path, and step). Various analytical methods were used for comparison of models that could accommodate data structural levels (group, individual, case-control). Models compared included conditional logistic regression, generalized additive modeling (GAM), and classification regression trees, such as random forests (RF) and gradient boosted regression tree (GBM). The goals of the study were to discuss the potential and limitations for machine learning methods using GPS collaring data to produce predictive habitat suitability mapping using the various scales and levels available. Results indicated that choosing the appropriate temporal level and raster scale improved model outputs. Overall, larger level analytical modeling frameworks and those that used multi-scale raster grains showed the best model evaluation with the inherent condition that they predict a broader scale and subset of data. The identification of the appropriate spatial scale, temporal scale and statistical model need careful consideration in predictive mapping efforts.
Cushman, S.A. and Huettmann, F. (2010) Spatial Complexity, Informatics, and Wildlife Conservation. Springer Japan, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-87771-4
Levin, S.A. (1992) The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture. Ecology, 73, 1943-1967. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941447
Turner, M. (1989) Landscape Ecology: The Effect of Pattern on Process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 171-197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001131
Johnson, D.H. (1980) The Comparison of Usage and Availability Measurements for Evaluating Resource Preference. Ecology, 61, 65-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937156
DeCesare, N.J., Hebblewhite, M., Schmiegelow, F., Hervieux, D., McDermid, G.J., Neufeld, L., et al. (2012) Transcending Scale Dependence in Identifying Habitat with Resource Selection Functions. Ecological Applications, 22, 1068-1083. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1610.1
Bauder, J.M., Breininger, D.R., Bolt, M.R., Legare, M.L., Jenkins, C.L., Rothermel, B.B., et al. (2018) Multi-Level, Multi-Scale Habitat Selection by a Wide-Ranging, Federally Threatened Snake. Landscape Ecology, 33, 743-763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0631-2
Zeller, K.A., Vickers, T.W., Ernest, H.B. and Boyce, W.M. (2017) Multi-Level, Multi-Scale Resource Selection Functions and Resistance Surfaces for Conservation Planning: Pumas as a Case Study. PLoS ONE, 12, e0179570. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179570
Johnson, D.S., Thomas, D.L., Ver Hoef, J.M. and Christ, A. (2008) A General Framework for the Analysis of Animal Resource Selection from Telemetry Data. Biometrics, 64, 968-976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00943.x
Zeller, K.A., McGarigal, K., Cushman, S.A., Beier, P., Vickers, T.W. and Boyce, W.M. (2016) Using Step and Path Selection Functions for Estimating Resistance to Movement: Pumas as a Case Study. Landscape Ecology, 31, 1319-1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0301-6
Elliot, N.B., Cushman, S.A., Macdonald, D.W. and Loveridge, A.J. (2014) The Devil Is in the Dispersers: Predictions of Landscape Connectivity Change with Demography. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 1169-1178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12282
Krishnamurthy, R., Cushman, S.A., Sarkar, M.S., Malviya, M., Naveen, M., Johnson, J.A., et al. (2016) Multi-Scale Prediction of Landscape Resistance for Tiger Dispersal in Central India. Landscape Ecology, 31, 1355-1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0363-0
Drew, C.A., Wiersma, Y.F. and Huettmann, F. (2011) Predictive Species and Habitat Modeling in Landscape Ecology. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7390-0
Kuhn, M. and Johnson, K. (2013) Applied Predictive Modeling. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3
Cushman, S.A. and Wasserman, T.N. (2018) Landscape Applications of Machine Learning: Comparing Random Forests and Logistic Regression in Multi-Scale Optimized Predictive Modeling of American Marten Occurrence in Northern Idaho, USA. In: Humphries, G., Magness, D.R. and Huettmann, F., Eds., Machine Learning for Ecology and Sustainable Natural Resource Management, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96978-7_9
Mi, C., Huettmann, F., Guo, Y., Han, X. and Wen, L. (2017) Why Choose Random Forest to Predict Rare Species Distribution with Few Samples in Large Undersampled Areas? Three Asian Crane Species Models Provide Supporting Evidence. PeerJ, 5, e2849. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2849
Martin, A.E. and Fahrig, L. (2012) Measuring and Selecting Scales of Effect for Landscape Predictors in Species-Habitat Models. Ecological Applications, 22, 2277-2292. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-2224.1
Shoemaker, K.T., Heffelfinger, L.J., Jackson, N.J., Blum, M.E., Wasley, T. and Stewart, K.M. (2018) A Machine-Learning Approach for Extending Classical Wildlife Resource Selection Analyses. Ecology and Evolution, 8, 3556-3569. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3936
Frakes, R.A., Belden, R.C., Wood, B.E. and James, F.E. (2015) Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat. PLoS ONE, 10, e0133044. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133044
Zeller, K.A., Jennings, M.K., Vickers, T.W., Ernest, H.B., Cushman, S.A. and Boyce, W.M. (2018) Are All Data Types and Connectivity Models Created Equal? Validating Common Connectivity Approaches with Dispersal Data. Diversity and Distributions, 24, 868-879. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12742
Duhart, C., Dublon, G., Mayton, B., Davenport, G. and Paradiso, J.A. (2019) Deep Learning for Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Efforts. 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, Long Beach, 5.
Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D. and Moore, R. (2017) Google Earth Engine: Planetary-Scale Geospatial Analysis for Everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
Miller, H.J., Dodge, S., Miller, J. and Bohrer, G. (2019) Towards an Integrated Science of Movement: Converging Research on Animal Movement Ecology and Human Mobility Science. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 33, 855-876. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2018.1564317
Wearn, O.R., Freeman, R. and Jacoby, D.M.P. (2019) Responsible AI for Conservation. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 72-73. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0022-7
Evans, T.L., Costa, M., Tomas, W.M. and Camilo, A.R. (2014) Large-Scale Habitat Mapping of the Brazilian Pantanal Wetland: A Synthetic Aperture Radar Approach. Remote Sensing of Environment, 155, 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.051
McGarigal, K., Wan, H.Y., Zeller, K.A., Timm, B.C. and Cushman, S.A. (2016) Multi-Scale Habitat Selection Modeling: A Review and Outlook. Landscape Ecology, 31, 1161-1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0374-x
Galpern, P. and Manseau, M. (2013) Finding the Functional Grain: Comparing Methods for Scaling Resistance Surfaces. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1269-1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9873-1
McGarigal, K., Zeller, K.A. and Cushman, S.A. (2016) Multi-Scale Habitat Selection Modeling: Introduction to the Special Issue. Landscape Ecology, 31, 1157-1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0388-4
Morato, R.G., Connette, G.M., Stabach, J.A., De Paula, R.C., Ferraz, K.M.P.M., Kantek, D.L.Z., et al. (2018) Resource Selection in an Apex Predator and Variation in Response to Local Landscape Characteristics. Biological Conservation, 228, 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.022
Jędrzejewski, W., Robinson, H.S., Abarca, M., Zeller, K.A., Velasquez, G., Paemelaere, E.A.D., et al. (2018) Estimating Large Carnivore Populations at Global Scale Based on Spatial Predictions of Density and Distribution—Application to the Jaguar (Panthera onca). PLoS ONE, 13, e0194719. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194719
Morato, R.G., Stabach, J.A., Fleming, C.H., Calabrese, J.M., De Paula, R.C., Ferraz, K.M.P.M., et al. (2016) Space Use and Movement of a Neotropical Top Predator: The Endangered Jaguar. PLoS ONE, 11, e0168176. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168176
Cullen Junior, L., Sana, D.A., Lima, F., Abreu, K.C. de and Uezu, A. (2013) Selection of Habitat by the Jaguar, Panthera onca (Carnivora: Felidae), in the Upper Paraná River, Brazil. Zoologia (Curitiba), 30, 379-387. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702013000400003
de la Torre, J.A., Núñez, J.M. and Medellín, R.A. (2017) Habitat Availability and Connectivity for Jaguars (Panthera onca) in the Southern Mayan Forest: Conservation Priorities for a Fragmented Landscape. Biological Conservation, 206, 270-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.034
Boitani, L. and Fuller, T.K. (2000) Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences. Columbia University Press, New York.
Calenge, C. (2015) Analysis of Animal Movements in R: The adehabitatLT Package. 85.
Hijmans, R.J. and Ghosh, A. (2019) Spatial Data Analysis with R. 135.
Porto, M. and Quaglietta, L. (2019) “SiMRiv” (Version 1.0.3): An R Package for Simulation and Analysis of Spatially-Explicit Individual Multistate (Animal) Movements in Any Landscape. 15.
Hooten, M.B., Hanks, E.M., Johnson, D.S. and Alldredge, M.W. (2014) Temporal Variation and Scale in Movement-Based Resource Selection Functions. Statistical Methodology, 17, 82-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stamet.2012.12.001
Elith, J., Leathwick, J.R. and Hastie, T. (2008) A Working Guide to Boosted Regression Trees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77, 802-813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x
Hastie, T. (2019) Generalized Additive Models 1.16.1. CRAN Repository.
De’ath, G. (2007) Boosted Trees for Ecological Modeling and Prediction. Ecology, 88, 243-251. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[243:BTFEMA]2.0.CO;2
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. (2013) An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7
Cutler, D.R., Edwards, T.C., Beard, K.H., Cutler, A., Hess, K.T., Gibson, J., et al. (2007) Random Forests for Classification in Ecology. Ecology, 88, 2783-2792. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0539.1
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. and Robert, T. (2017) An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R.
Ridgeway, G. (2019) Generalized Boosted Models: A Guide to the GBM Package. 15.
Allouche, O., Tsoar, A. and Kadmon, R. (2006) Assessing the Accuracy of Species Distribution Models: Prevalence, Kappa and the True Skill Statistic (TSS): Assessing the Accuracy of Distribution Models. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 1223-1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
Etherington, T.R. (2016) Least-Cost Modelling and Landscape Ecology: Concepts, Applications, and Opportunities. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 1, 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-016-0006-9
Shmueli, G. (2010) To Explain or to Predict? Statistical Science, 25, 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-STS330