Towards an Ethical and Ecological Approach to Electricity Generation: A Comparative Analysis of Coal and Nuclear Power in the USA
- 1 Department of Systematic Theology, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ, USA
- 2 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ, USA
Abstract
According to the US Energy Information Administration, about 4118 billion kilowatt-hours (kWh) electricity was generated at large-scale generation facilities in 2019. About 63% of this was from fossil fuels, e.g., coal, natural gas, petroleum, and other gases. Environmental exposure to particulates, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, arsenic, radioactive fly ash, and other pollutants are extremely detrimental to the human cardiovascular, respiratory, and nervous systems. Such exposure increases the risk of lung cancer, stroke, heart disease, chronic respiratory diseases, respiratory infections, and other illnesses. In light of the challenges associated with renewables providing large quantities of base load power, as well as other factors, the benefits offered by nuclear power should be reexamined by policy makers to move the country towards a more ecological and ethical method of electric power production. This paper offers a concise analysis of many of the salient issues, comparing electricity generation from coal plants and light water nuclear reactors.
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (accessed 1 May 2020) Sources of Radiation. http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/radiation/around-us/sources.html
- Second Vatican Council (1965) Gaudium et Spes, 26 § 1.
- US Energy Information Administration (accessed 1 May 2020) What Is U.S. Electricity Generation by Energy Source? http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=427&t=3
- Haddad, S. and Dones, R. (1991) Comparative Health and Environmental Risks for Various Energy Sources. IAEA Bulletin, 3, 14-19.
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (accessed 1 May 2020) Operating Nuclear Power Reactors (by Location or Name). http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/reactor/
- Murray, R.L. and Holbert, K.E. (2020) Nuclear Energy. An Introduction to the Concepts, Systems, and Applications of Nuclear Processes. 8th Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
- Glasstone, S. and Sesonske, A. (1994) Nuclear Reactor Engineering: Reactor Systems Engineering. Springer, New York.
- Ishikawa, M. (2015) A Study of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident Process: What Caused the Core Melt and Hydrogen Explosion? Springer, New York.
- Haddad and Dones (1991) Comparative Health and Environmental Risks for Various Energy Sources. 15.
- Ibid.
- Ibid., 17.
- US Environmental Protection Agency (accessed 15 April 2020) TENORM: Coal Combustion Residuals. https://www.epa.gov/radiation/tenorm-coal-combustion-residuals
- Hvistendahl, M. (13 December 2007) Coal Ash Is More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste. Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste
- Murray, R.L. and Holbert, K.E. (2020) Nuclear Energy. An Introduction to the Concepts, Systems, and Applications of Nuclear Processes. 8th Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, Ch. 22.
- World Nuclear News (6 August 2008) Yucca Mountain Cost Estimate Rises to $96 Billion. http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/WR-Yucca_Mountain_cost_estimate_rises_to_96_billion_dollars-0608085.html
- The Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, Passed on 14 April 2011.
- Haddad and Dones (1991) Comparative Health and Environmental Risks for Various Energy Sources. 17.