Soil cleaning, the ability of the soil to immobilize the risk elements, belongs to important agroecosystem services in terms of protection of the hydrosphere and plant production from contamination. Dynamic monitoring of selected indicators of soil quality was realized in a special network of site on soil used for planting fast growing willow (Salix viminalis). Monitoring of the study site Kuchyňa (Mollic Fluvisol) is running since 2010 year. The fast-growing willow was planted on an area of about 43 hectares. Study site Kuchyňa belonged to the degraded contaminated sites, at the time of planting (the total contents of the risk elements were as follows: Cd 1.016 mg ∙ kg − 1 , Zn 199.000 mg ∙ kg − 1 , Ni 51.500 mg ∙ kg − 1 ) There were positive changes in the total content of cadmium, zinc and nickel (in 2018 year), the zinc content decreased by 27% compared to 2010, the nickel content was lower by 23% and the Cd content by 57% in comparison to 2010 year, these elements have a declining trend during the monitored period. The remediation ability of the willow in relation to the risk elements was manifested by the accumulation of these elements in the wood mass and by their decrease in the soil below the limit value. The regulatory ecosystem service, the potential for the immobilisation of the risk elements, was evaluated based on the sum of the assessment of the contamination potential and the sorption potential of soil. The decrease of the total content of risk elements in the soil below the limit value was manifested in the increase of the potential of the agroecosystem regulatory service, the potential of risk element immobilisation, from very low category to medium category. If willow cultivation continued in the next decade, the value of risk element Zn would most likely reach the value 73 mg ∙ kg − 1 , which is less than 50% of the limit value, based on the results of the predictive model. In the case of Cd, the soil would be completely cleaned and in the case of Ni, its total content in the soil would fall to 23 mg ∙ kg − 1 , which is less than 40% of the limit value. The overall potential for contamination would fall into the category—very low (forecast for 2021 year). The higher potential of immobilisation reduces the risk of contaminants transport and thus prevents contamination of the other ecosystem components such as biota.
KeywordsSoil CleaningWillow Crops for BioenergyRisk ElementsSoil Quality Indicators
Bartko, M. (2015) Growing of Fast-Growing Wood on Dendromas in Conditions of Slovakia (Pestovanie rychlorastúcich drevín na dendromasu v podmienkach Slovenska). In: Prčík, M. and Kotrla, M., Eds., Fast-Growing Trees and Plants Growing for Energy Purposes. New knowledge on Ecophysiology, Ecology, Economy, Energetics, Environmental Science, Legislation and Technology. International Scientific Conference, Nitra, Slovakia.
Werling, B.P., Dickson, T.l., Isaacs, R., Gaines, H., Gratton, C., Gross, K., et al. (2014) Perennial Grasslands Enhance Bio-Diversity and Multiple Ecosystem Services in Bioenergy Landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 1652-1657. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309492111
Porvaz, P., Naščáková, J., Kotorová, D. and Kováč, L. (2009) Field Crops as a Source of Biomass for Energy Use in Slovakia (Poľné plodiny ako zdroj biomasy na energetické využitie v podmienkach Slovenska). Inovatívne Technologie Pre Efektívne Využitie biomasy v Energetike, 66-75.
Mishra, S.K., Negri, M.C., Kozak, J., Cacho, J.F., Quinn, J.R., Secchi, S. and Ssegane, H. (2018) Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Alternative Bioenergy Landscape Scenarios. GCB Bioenergy, 11, 748-762. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12602
Bartko, M. (2011) What Is the Economic Efficiency of Energy Crops? (Aká je ekonomická efektívnosť energetickych porastov?). Lesnická práce, 11, 19-21.
Aengenheyster, M., Feng, Q.Y., Van Der Ploeg, F. and Dijkstra, H.A. (2018) The Point of No Return for Climate Action: Effects of Climate Uncertainty and Risk Tolerance. Earth System Dynamics, 9, 1085-1095.
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S. and Müller, F. (2012) Mapping Ecosystem Service Supply, Demand and Budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
Makovníková, J., Pálka, B., Širáň, M., Kanianska, R., Kizeková, M., Jaďuďová, J. (2017) Modeling and Evaluation Agroecosystem Services. (Modelovanie a hodnotenie agroekosystémovych služieb). Belianum. Vydavateľstvo Univerzity Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici, 150s.
Birghofer, K., Diehl, E., Andersson, J., Ekroos, J., Früh-Müller, A., Machnikowski, F., Mader, V.L., Nilsson, L., Sasaki, K., Rundlöf, M., Wolters, V. and Smith, H.G. (2015) Ecosystem Services—Current Challenges and Opportunities for Ecological Research. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2014.00087
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Our Human Planet: Summary for Decision Makers. In: The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series, Vol. 5, Island Press, Washington DC.
Costanza, R. (2008) Ecosystem Services: Mmultiple Classification Systems Are Needed. Biological Conservation, 141, 350-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.020
Dominati, E.J., Mackay, A., Lynch, B., Heath, N. and Millner, I. (2014) An Ecosystem Services Approach to the Quantification of Shallow Mass Movement Erosion and the Value of Soil Conservation Practices. Ecosystem Services, 9, 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.006
Burkhard, B. and Maes, J., Eds. (2017) Mapping Ecosystem Services. Advanced Books. https://doi.org/10.3897/ab.e12837
Greiner, L, Keller, A., Gret-Regamey, A. and Papritz, A. (2017) Soil Function Assessment: Review of Methods for Quantifying the Contributions of Soils to Ecosystem Services. Land Use Policy, 69, 224-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.025
Makovníková, J., Barančíková, G. and Pálka, B. (2007) Approach to the Assessment of Transport Risk of Inorganic Pollutants Based on the Immobilisation Capability of Soil. Plant, Soil and Environment, 53, 365-373.
Makovníková, J., Pálka, B., Širáň, M., Kizeková, M. and Kanianska, R. (2019) The Potential of Regulating Ecosystem Service-Filtering Potential for Inorganic Pollutants-Supplied by Soils of Slovakia. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 68, 177-185. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.68.2.5
Hansen, H.C.H.B., Kobza, J., Schmidt, R., Szakál P., Borgaard, O.K., Holm, P.E., Kanianska, R., Bognarova, S., Makovníková, J, Matúšková, L., Mičuda, R. and Styk, J. (2001) Environmental Soil Chemistry. Pedagogická spoločnosť Jána Ámosa Komenského, Banská Bystrica, Scriptum. 191.
Volk, T.A., Heavey, J.P. and Eisenbies, M.H. (2016) Advances in Shrub-Willow Crops for Bioenergy, Renewable Products, and Environmental Benefits. Food and Energy Security, 5, 97-106 https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.82
Jandačka, J., Nosek, R., Kaduchová, K. and Kolková, Z. (2011) Use of Plant Biomass in Energy (Využitie rastlinnej biomasy v energetike). GEORG, Žilina.
Vilček, J. (2011) Potenciály a parametre kvality poľnohospodárskych pôd Slovenska. Geograficky Časopis, 63, 133-154.
Soušek, Z., Nikl, M. and Remešová, M. (2019) Use and Cultivation of Forest Tree Biomass for Further Processing and Energy Purposes. Working Methodology for Private Forestry Consultants (Využití a pěstování biomasy lesních dřevin pro další zpracování a energetické účely. Pracovní metodika pro privátní poradce vlesnictví). ústav pro hospodářskou úpravu lesů Brandys nad Labem 2019. http://www.uhul.cz/images/poradenstvi/2019/BIOMASA19.pdf
Kriššák, P, Jandačka, J. and Malcho, M. (2006) Legislation and Support Mechanisms Related to the Energy Use of Biomass in the Slovak Republic. (Legislatíva a podporné mechanizmy súvisiace s energetickym využitím biomasy v SR). Biomasa ako zdroj energie, 6-7, Ostravica, ČR, str. 24-32.
Straka, L. (2009) Energy utilization of Phytomass Grown in Slovakia. (Energetické využitie fytomasy pestovanej na Slovensku). In. Biom.Cz. http://biom.cz/cz-pestovani-biomasy/odborne-clanky
Hecl, J. and Tóth, Š. (2020) Status and Development in the Use of Renewable Energy Sources in the Slovak Republic (Stav a vyvoj vo využívaní obnoviteľnych zdrojov energie v SR). http://agroporadenstvo.sk/index.php?pl=103&article=1708
Kološta, S. and Flaška, F. (2016) Biomass Local Production Systems and Their Managing: Alternative to Rural Development in Slovakia. Folia Oeconomica, 2, 23-40. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.320.02
Kobza, J., Barančíková, G., Dodok, R., Hrivňáková, K., Makovníková, J., Pálka, B., Pavlenda, P., Schlosserová, J., Styk, J. and Širáň, M. (2014) Soil Monitoring of the Slovak Republic (Monitoring pôd SR). National Agriculture and Food Centre-Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava, 252 p.
Erhard, M., Teller, A., Maes, J., et al. (2016) Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and Their Services. Mapping and assessing the condition of Europe’s Ecosystems: Progress and Challenges. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Kobza, J., Barančíková, G., Bezák, P., Dodok, R., grečo, V., Hrivňáková, K., Chlpík, J., Listjak, M., Makovníková, J., Mališ, J., Píš, V., Schlosserová, J., slávik, O., Styk, J. and Širáň, M. (2011) Jednotné pracovné postupy rozborov pôd. (Uniform Analytical Procedures for Soil). SSCRI Publishing, Bratislava, 136 p.
Van Camp, B., Bujarrabal, A.R., Gentile, R.J.A., Jones, L., Montanarella, L., Olazabal, O. and Selvaradjou, S.K. (2004) Reports of the Technical Working Groups Established under the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
McClean, G. (2012) The Effects of Land Conversion to Bioenergy Crops on Soil Carbon. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress Eurosoil, Bari, Italy.
Anderson-Teixeira, K.J., Davis, S.C., Masters, M.D. and DeLucia, E.H. (2009) Changes in Soil Organic Carbon under Biofuel Crops. GCB Bioenergy, 1, 75-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2008.01001.x
Lemus, R. and Lal, R. (2005) Bioenergy Crops and Carbon Sequestration. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 24, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680590910393
Palomo-Campesino, S., Garcia-Llorente, M. and Gonzalez, J.A. (2018) Exploring the Connections between Agroecological Practices and Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 10, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124339
Šoltysová, B. and Danilovič, M. (2019) Energy Crops in Relation to the Soil Environment (Energetické plodiny vo vzťahu k pôdnemu prostrediu). NPPC Lužianky, 60 p.
Fecenko, J. and Ložek, O. (2000) Nutrition and Fertilization of Field Crops (Vyživa a hnojenie poľnych plodín). SPU, Nitra, 452 s.
Schmidt, U. (2003) Enhancing Phytoextraction: The Effect of Chemical Soil Manipulation on Mobility, Plant Accumulation and Leaching of Heavy Metals. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 1939-1954. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2003.1939
Lone, M.I., He, Z.-L., Stoffella, P.J. and Yang, X.-E. (2008) Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal Polluted Soils and Water: Progresses and Perspectives. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 9, 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0710633