Application of Matrix Approach for Evaluation and Assessment the Potential of Recreational Ecosystem Service in Model Regions in Slovakia — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Application of Matrix Approach for Evaluation and Assessment the Potential of Recreational Ecosystem Service in Model Regions in Slovakia
National Agricultural and Food Centre/Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
,
National Agricultural and Food Centre/Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
,
Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Faculty of Ecomonics, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
,
Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Faculty of Ecomonics, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
1 National Agricultural and Food Centre/Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
2 National Agricultural and Food Centre/Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
3 Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Faculty of Ecomonics, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
4 Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Faculty of Ecomonics, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
Recreation and tourism are important for economic growth and human wellbeing. They are directly related to the cultural services provided by ecosystems. Recreational services, as part of tourism, have the greatest potential for development within the sector of services in the Slovak economy, and they are able to generate a significant number of new jobs especially in small rural regions. There is a gap in the literature providing assessments of geographically small regions in relation to their potential to provide different types of ecosystem services. The aim of the article was to evaluate and assess the recreational potential of ecosystem services in two small pilot regions of the Slovak Republic, Brezno district and Krupina district. Modified matrix of indices was used. Results showed that Brezno district has a higher area of ecosystems with a higher potential for recreation, therefore the conditions for recreation and tourism are much better in comparison to Krupina district. However, the use of recreation potential in Brezno district is negatively affected by the availability of sites and transport options, which is reflected in a lower ratio of visitors to the capacity of recreation potential. This finding opens up discussion about opportunities to create new jobs within sustainable tourism in Brezno district. This study provides an alternative view to the assessment and evaluation of the recreational potential of ecosystem services in small regions. Moreover, the methodology developed in this paper is replicable and could be applied by planners using geographical information systems.
Costanza, R. and Daly, H.E. (1992) Natural Capital and Sustainable Development. Conservation Biology, 6, 37-463. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x
World Trade Organization (2019) World Trade Report. World Trade Organization, Geneva,19 p.
Boumans, R., Costanza, R., Farley, J., Wilson, M.A., Portela, R., Rotmans, J., Villa, F. and Grasso, M. (2002) Modeling the Dynamics of the Integrated Earthsystem and the Value of Global Ecosystem Services Using the GUMBO Model. Ecological Economics, 41, 529-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00098-8
Braat, L.C. and de Groot, R. (2012) The Ecosystem Services Agenda: Bridging Theworlds of Natural Science and Economics, Conservation and Development, and Public and Private Policy. Ecosystem Services, 1, 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011
Dominati, E., Patterson, M. and Mackay, A. (2010) A Framework for Classifying and Quantifying the Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services of Soils. Ecological Economics, 69, 1858-1868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well- Being: Our Human Planet: Summary for Decision Makers. Vol. 5, Island Press, Washington DC.
Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Kopperoinen, L., Maes, J., Schägner, J.P., Termansen, M., Zandersen, M., Perez-Soba, M., Scholefield, P.A. and Bidoglio G. (2014) Mapping Cultural Ecosystemservices: A Framework to Assess the Potential for Outdoor Recreation Acrossthe EU. Ecological Indicators, 45, 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018
Joyce, K. and Sutton, S. (2009) A Method for Automatic Generation of the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum in New Zealand. Applied Geography 29, 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.11.006
Bratman, G.N, Anderson, C.B, Berman, M.G., Cochran, B., de Vries, S., et al. (2019) Nature and Mental Health: An Ecosystem Service Perspective. Science Advances, 5, eaax0903. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0903
Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M.,Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., García Del Amo, D., et al. (2012) Uncovering Ecosystem Services Bundles Throughs Ocialp References. PLoS ONE, 7, e38970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
Mehmetoglu, M. (2007) Typologi Singnature-Based Tourists by Activity—Theoretical and Practical Implications. Tourism Management, 28, 651-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.02.006
Milcu, A., Hanspach, J., Abson, D. and Fischer, J. (2013) Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research. Ecology and Society, 18, Article No. 44. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05790-180344
Maes, J., Braat, L., Jax, K., Hutchins, M., Furman, E., Termansen, M., et al. (2011) A Spatial Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Europe: Methods, Case Studies and Policy Analysis—Phase 1. PEER Report No. 3, Partnership for European Environ- mental Research, Ispra. https://www.ufz.de/export/data/2/99145_Maes_et_al._2011_A_spatial_assessment_of _ecosy.pdf
Parente, G. and Bovolenta, S. (2012) The Role of Grassland in Rural Tourism and Recreation in Europe. In: Parente, G. and Bovolenta, S., Eds., Grassland—A European Resource? Grassland Science in Europe, Vol. 17, Polish Grassland Society, 733-743.
Page, J.S. and Dowling, R.K. (2002) Ecotourism: Theme in Tourism. Pearson Education, Essex.
Wiezik, M., Niňajová, I., Švajda, J. and Elexová, Ľ. (2019) The Concept of Nature Tourism in Slovak Conditions (Koncept prírodného turizmu v slovenskych pod- mienkach). Aevisn.o. 39 s.
Weiss, P., et al. (2005) Regionalization of Tourism in the Slovak Republic (Regio- nalizácia cestovného ruchu v Slovenskej republike). Ministerstvo hospodárstva SR, Bratislava, 114 s.
Burkhard, B., Kandziorai, M.S. and Müller, F. (2014) Ecosystem Service Potentials, Flows and Demands—Concepts for Spatial Localisation, Indication and Quantification. Landscape Online, 34, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201434 http://www.landscapeonline.de/103097lo201434
Černecký, J., Gajdo, P., Ďuricov, V., Černeck,á Ľ., Švajda, J., Andráš, P., Ulrych, L., Rybanič, R. and Považan, R. (2020) The Value of Ecosystems and Their Services in Slovakia (Hodnota ekosystémov a ich služieb na Slovensku). ŠOP SR, Banská Bystrica, 166 p.
Campagne, C. and Roche, P. (2018) May the Matrix Be with You! Guidelines for the Application of Expert Based Matrix Approach for Ecosystem Services Assessment and Mapping. One Ecosystem, 3, e24134. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e24134
Makovníková, J., Pálka, B., Siráň, M., Kanianska, R., Kizeková, M. and Jaďuďová, J. (2017) Modeling and Assessing of Agroecosystem Services (Modelovanie a hodnotenie agroekosystémovych služieb). Belianum, Banská Bystrica.
Makovníková, J., Kobza, J., Pálka, B., Mališ, J., Kanianska, R. and Kizeková, M. (2016) An Approach to Mapping the Potential of Cultural Agroecosystem Services. Soil and Water Research, 11, 44-52. https://doi.org/10.17221/109/2015-SWR
Burkhard, B. and Maes, J. (2017) Mapping Ecosystem Services. Advanced Books, Pensoft Publishers, Sofia. https://doi.org/10.3897/ab.e12837
Frélichová, J., Vačkář, D., Pártl, A., Loučková, B., Harmáčková, Z. and Lorencová, E. (2014) Integrated Assessment of Ecosystem Services in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Services, 8, 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001
Makovníková, J., Pálka, B., Širáň, M., Kanianska, R. and Kizeková, M. (2017) Potential of Agroecosystem Services. The Case of Slovakia. Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal, 8, Article ID: 555727.
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F. and Windhorst, W. (2009) Landscapes’ Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services—A Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments. Landscape Online, 15, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.200915
Považan, R., Getzner, M. and Švajda, J. (2015) On the Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Muránska Planina National Park (In Slovak). Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research and Management, 7, 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1553/eco.mont-7-2s61
Reid, W.V., Mooney, H.A., Cropper, R.A., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S.R., Chopra, K., et al. (2005) Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (Ekosystémy a lidsky blahobyt). Praha: World Resource Institute, Centrum pro otázky životního prostředí. Univerzita Karlova v Prahe, 138 p.
Program hospodárskeho a sociálneho rozvoja mesta Brezno (2008) Program of Economic and Social Development of the City of Brezno. https://app.otvorenestrategie.sk/dokument/1929
Program hospodárskeho a sociálneho rozvoja mesta Krupina (2016) Program of Economic and Social Development of the City of Krupina. https://app.otvorenestrategie.sk/repozitar/prehlad?visualPaginator_Dokumenty-page=64
Maes, J, Paracchini, M.L, Zulian, G., Dunbar, M.B. and Alkemade, R. (2012) Synergies and Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Service Supply, Biodiversity, and Habitat Conservation Status in Europe. Biological Conservation, 155, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016
Kanianska, R., Jaďuďová, J., Makovníková, J., Kizeková, M. and Tomaškin, J. (2016) Ecosystem Services (Ekosystémové služby). Belianum. Vydavateľstvo Univerzity Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici, 244 s.
Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic (2009) Sektorový operačný program Priemysel a Služby (Sectoral Operational Program Industry and Services). Bratislava, 112 p.