Genotype and task influence stinging response thresholds of honeybee (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L.) workers of African and European descent
- 1 CENIDFA-INIFAP, Animal Physiology Research Center, Ajuchitlán, Mexico
- 2 Department of Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
- 3 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
Abstract
The stinging response thresholds of individual European and Africanized worker honeybees ( Apis mellifera L.) were analyzed. Workers of each genotype performing defense (guard and soldier bees) and non-defense (nest and forager bees) associated tasks were collected and exposed to an electric stimulus of 0.5 mA, and the time they took to sting a leather substrate was recorded. Africanized bees had significant lower thresholds of response than European bees. Guards and soldiers were faster to sting than nest and forager bees for the Africanized geno type, whereas for the European genotype, guards stung significantly faster than bees of the other three task groups. This is the first study that shows that individual bees specialized in two defensive tasks also have a lower response threshold for stinging. Our results fit a model of division of labor based on differences in response thresholds to stimuli among workers of different genotypes and task groups.
- Robinson, G.E. (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annual Review of Entomology, 37, 637-665. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.003225
- Page, R.E. and Erber, J. (2002) Levels of behavioral organization and the evolution of division of labor. Naturwissenschaften, 89, 91-106. doi:10.1007/s00114-002-0299-x
- Breed, M.D., Guzmán-Novoa, E. and Hunt, G.J. (2004) Defensive behavior of honey bees: Organization, genetics, and comparisons with other bees. Annual Review of Entomology, 49, 271-298. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123155
- Breed, M.D., Robinson, G.E. and Page, R.E. (1990) Division of labor during honey bee colony defense. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 395-401. doi:10.1007/BF00164065
- Guzmán-Novoa, E., Hunt, G.J., Uribe-Rubio, J.L. and Prieto-Merlos, D. (2004) Genotypic effects of honey bee (Apis mellifera) defensive behavior at the individual and colony levels: The relationship of guarding, pursuing and stinging. Apidologie, 35, 15-24. doi:10.1051/apido:2003061
- Hunt, G.J., Guzmán-Novoa, E., Fondrk, M.K. and Page, R.E. (1998) Quantitative trait loci for honeybee stinging behavior and body size. Genetics, 148, 1203-1213.
- Guzmán-Novoa, E., Hunt, G.J., Uribe-Rubio, J.L., Smith, C. and Arechavaleta-Velasco, M.E. (2002) Confirmation of QTL effects and evidence of genetic dominance of honeybee defensive behavior: Results of colony and individual behavioral assays. Behavioral Genetics, 32, 95-102. doi:10.1023/A:1015245605670
- Arechavaleta-Velasco, M.E., Hunt, G.J. and Emore, C. (2003) Quantitative trait loci that influence the expression of guarding and stinging behaviors of individual honey bees. Behavioral Genetics, 33, 357-364. doi:10.1023/A:1023458827643
- Arechavaleta-Velasco, M.E. and Hunt, G.J. (2004) Binary trait loci that influence honey bee guarding behavior. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 97, 177-183. doi:10.1023/A:1023458827643
- Collins, A.M., Rinderer, T.E., Harbo, J.R. and Bolten, A.B. (1982) Colony defense by Africanized and European honeybees. Science, 218, 72-74. doi:10.1126/science.218.4567.72
- Guzmán-Novoa, E. and Page, R.E. (1994) Genetic dominance and worker interactions affect honeybee colony defense. Behavioral Ecology, 5, 91-97. doi:10.1093/beheco/5.1.91
- Uribe-Rubio, J.L., Guzmán-Novoa, E., Hunt, G.J., Correa-Benitez, A. and Zozaya, R.J.A. (2003) Effect of Africanization on honey production, defensive behavior and size in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) of the Mexican high plateau. Veterinaria Mexico, 34, 47-59.