Embodied Energy & Cost Issues of Tank-Bed-Lime Based Geopolymer Adobes
- 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Government Engineering College, Ramanagara, India
- 2 BMS College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India
- 3 Department of Civil Engineering, BMS College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India
- 4 Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India
Abstract
It is well-known that a product or a system is sustainable if it is economically viable, socially acceptable and environmentally friendly. Load bearing masonry is one such example which is quite sustainable, especially if the masonry units are locally available. It is important to quantify the environmental benefits and cost, if an alternative to an existing technology is to be suggested. Of course the issues related to acceptance have to be discussed and addressed. This paper presents the quantification of embodied energy and cost of lime-pozzolana-cement (LPC) geopolymer based masonry units made using locally available bulk ingredients viz. tank-bed soil (TBS) and brick-powder (BP). The masonry adobe units developed have achieved the target performance in terms of strength, low water absorption and relative ease of production. Simultaneously the issues related to cost are also discussed in this paper. The studies have revealed that the bulk contributor to embodied energy and cost of geopolymer adobes are the alkaline materials viz sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate. However, the embodied energy and cost per unit strength appears to be better than that of conventional table moulded bricks in south India, especially when alkaline solution at 2M concentration is used with LPC.
- Davidovits, J. (1988) Geopolymer Chemistry and Properties. Geopolymer, 88, 125-148.
- Maini, S. and Thautam, V. (2013) Embodied Energy of Various Materials and Technologies. Auroville Earth Institute, A Data Compilation.
- Manjit, S. (2012) Energy and Environmental Concerns in Building Materials. National Conference on Emerging Trends of Energy Conservation in Buildings. Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee.
- Tempest, B., Sanusi, O., Gergely, J., Ogunro, V. and Weggel, D. (2009) Compressive Strength and Embodied Energy Optimization of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference.
- Fawer, M., Concannon, M. and Rieber, W. (1999) Life Cycle Inventories for the Production of Sodium Silicates. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 4, 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979498
- Surekha, B., Hegde, M.N. and Jagadish, K.S. (2016) Energy and Building Materials. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 5, 13-24.
- Varsha, B.N., Raghunath, S. and Keshava, M. (2017) Influence of Choice of Structural System & In-Fill Masonry on the Embodied Energy & Cost of a Low-Rise Residential Urban-Building Indian Case Study. Open Journal of Energy Efficiency, 6, 41-60.
- IS1077-1992 (2007) Common Burnt Clay Building Bricks-Specification. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
- IS: 1498-1970. Indian Standard Code of Practice for Soil Classification. 3rd Edition, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
- Jagadish, K.S. and Yogananda, M.R. (1984) Production of Alternative Cements for Rural Applications. Proceedings of Regional Seminar on Farm Machinery and Rural Industries, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
- Yogananda, M.R., Jagadish, K.S. and Kumar, R. (1983) Studies on Surkhi and Rice Husk Ash Pozzolana. ASTRA, IISc, Bengaluru.
- IS: 1905-1987 (2002) Indian Standard Code of Practice for Structural Use of Unreinforced Masonry. 3rd Edition, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
- Saranya, S. (2016) Quantification of Embodied Energy for Both Coarse and Fine Aggregates. MTech Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, BMS College of Engineering, Bengaluru.