A Comparison of Residential Energy Demand Behaviour in Britain and Australia
- 1 School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK
- 2 School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
Abstract
This research highlights an interesting finding comparing energy use in the residential sector in the United Kingdom and Australia. Energy consumed per capita is largely similar, however the energy available is manifestly different. Australia is blessed with a greater abundance of energy than the United Kingdom. Particularly, in the main area of study in Australia, Victoria state, Brown coal is easy and cheap to access. It is therefore politically more difficult to argue that the population affords more expensive sustainable energy resources even though Australia is one of the countries that can readily produce this type of energy. Britain, however, is a net importer of energy. A large proportion of this energy is natural gas which is a fossil fuel, and therefore contributes to the negative effects of climate change. The findings of this research focus on what motivates residential users of energy to use energy more sustainably. It presents the conclusions of previous research as a backdrop, and reveals the complexity of occupant behaviour. Key drivers are financial incentives and the role of large organisations such as governments in influ-encing behaviour. This may take significant time.
- DECC (2014) Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics (DUKES). Department of Energy and Climate Change. [Online] https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/renewable-sources-of-energy-chapter-6-digest-of- united-kingdom-energy-statistics-dukes
- DCCEE (2012) Australia’s Emissions Projections 2012. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency 2012, DCCEE, Canberra, ACT.
- Stern, N. (2006) Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change (Pre-Publication Edition). Executive Summary. HM Treasury, London.
- Sandeman, R.J. (2006) A Critique of Present Australian Energy Policy. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 63, 719-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230601073715
- Department of the Environment (2014). [Online] http://www.environment.gov.au/
- IRENA (2015) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2014. International Renewable Energy Agency. [Online] http://www.irena.org/publications
- Indymedia (2010) [Online] http://www.indymedia.org.au/2010/07/21/victoria-targets-solar-energy-as-new-report- shows-renewable-energy-potential
- Wilson, C. and Dowlatabadi, H. (2007) Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 169-203. [Online] https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.053006.141137 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.053006.141137
- Thaler, R. (1994) Quasi Rational Economics. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
- Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2009) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin, New York.
- Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometric, 47, 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
- Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R. (2010) Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400834181
- Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R. (2000) Economics and Identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 715-753. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554881
- Akerlof, G. and Shiller, R. (2009) Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
- Keynes, J.M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Macmillan, London, 161-162.