Quantitative Morphometric Characteristics of the Varthur Catchment Area, Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka, Using Geospatial Techniques
- 1 Department of Geology, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India
- 2 Department of Geology, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India
Abstract
The Varthur Catchment area lies in the southern part of Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka, between 12˚48'24.52"N to 12˚53'59.85"N and 77˚24'59.95"E to 77˚30'6.72"E, covering an area of 284 km 2 . Drainage characteristics were extracted from SRTM DEM and IRS P6 LISS III imagery using ArcGIS 10.2.2, and the catchment was delineated into ten sub-watersheds. The catchment is a 5th-order basin with a dendritic drainage pattern. The mean bifurcation ratio is 3.1, total stream length is 327 km, and mean drainage density is 1.31 km/km 2 , indicating moderate permeability. The elongation ratio (0.064) and circularity ratio (0.53) reflect a structurally controlled, elongated basin. Hypsometric analysis yields an integral of 0.46, placing the basin in the mature stage of geomorphic development, with about 54% of the original landmass already eroded. Sub-watershed prioritisation using the composite parameter method identifies SWS-1 and SWS-7 as high-priority zones requiring urgent soil conservation measures and SWS-2, SWS-3, SWS-4, SWS-5, SWS-6, SWS-9, and SWS-10 are classified as moderate priority, indicating moderate infiltration capacity, while SWS-8 shows the lowest erosion risk. The findings provide a baseline for watershed management and sustainable land- and water-resource planning.
- Horton, R.E. (1945) Erosional Development of Streams and Their Drainage Basins; Hydrophysical Approach to Quantitative Morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin , 56, 275-370. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:edosat]2.0.co;2
- Borah, H. (2020) Morphometric Analysis for Prioritization of Sub-Watersheds of Jamuna River Watershed, Assam, India Using Remote Sensing and GIS Technique. Inter national Journal of Control and Automation , 13, 18-26. https://www.academia.edu/43316382/Morphometric_Analysis_for_Prioritization_of_Sub_Watersheds_of_Jamuna_River_Watershed_Assam_India_Using_Remote_Sensing_and_GIS_Technique
- Raja Shekar, P. and Mathew, A. (2024) Morphometric Analysis of Watersheds: A Comprehensive Review of Data Sources, Quality, and Geospatial Techniques. Water shed Ecology and the Environment , 6, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsee.2023.12.001
- Javed, A., Khanday, M.Y. and Ahmed, R. (2009) Prioritization of Sub-Watersheds Based on Morphometric and Land Use Analysis Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing , 37, 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-009-0016-8
- Basappa Reddy, M. (2003) Status of Groundwater Quality in Bangalore and Its Environs. https://prod-qt-images.s3.amazonaws.com/indiawaterportal/import/sites/default/files/iwp2/GWQualityComplete.pdf
- Sreedevi, P.D., Subrahmanyam, K. and Ahmed, S. (2004) The Significance of Morphometric Analysis for Obtaining Groundwater Potential Zones in a Structurally Controlled Terrain. Environmental Geology , 47, 412-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1166-1
- Strahler, A.N. (1964) Quantitative Geomorphology of Drainage Basins and Channel Networks. In: Chow, V.T., Ed., Handbook of Applied Hydrology , McGraw-Hill, 4.39-4.76.
- Schumm, S.A. (1956) Evolution of Drainage Systems and Slopes in Badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological Society of America Bulletin , 67, 597-646. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:eodsas]2.0.co;2
- Pareta, K. and Pareta, U. (2011) Quantitative Morphometric Analysis of a Watershed of Yamuna Basin, India Using ASTER (DEM) Data and GIS. Inter national Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences , 2, 248-269.
- Nag, S. (1998) Morphometric Analysis Using Remote Sensing Techniques in the Chaka Sub-Basin, Purulia District, West Bengal. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing , 26, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03007341
- Singh, S. and Singh, M.C. (1997) Morphometric Analysis of Kanhar River Basin. National Geographical Journal of India , 43, 31-43.