Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Heat Flux Modulation in Domino Dynamo Model
Institute of the Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Institute of Geophysics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
- 1 Institute of the Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- 2 Institute of Geophysics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
Open Journal of Geology·Volume 03 (2013)·Pages 55–59·Published 30 April 2013·DOI10.4236/ojg.2013.32B013
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
Using the domino dynamo model, we show how specific axisymmetric and equatorial symmetric forms of the heat flux variations at the core-mantle boundary change the frequency of the geomagnetic field reversals. In fact, we are able to demonstrate the effect known from the modern 3D planetary dynamo models using an ensemble of interacting spins, which obey equations of the Langevin type with a random force. We also consider applications to the giant planets and offer explanations of some specific episodes of the geomagnetic field in the past.
KeywordsLiquid CoreGeomagnetic Field ReversalsAnisotropic Heat FluxThermal Traps
- G. Rudiger and R. Hollerbach, “The Magnetic Universe: Geophysical and Astrophysical Dynamo Theory,” Wiley-VCHr, Weinheim, 2004.
- C. A. Jones, “Planetary Magnetic Fields and Fluid Dynamos,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 43, 2011, pp. 583-614. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160727
- P. Hejda and M. Reshetnyak, “Effects of Anisotropy in the Geos-trophic Turbulence,” Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 177, 2009, pp.152-160. doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2009.08.006
- J. Pedlosky, “Geo-physical Fluid Dynamics,” Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4650-3
- U. R. Christensen, “Zonal Flow Driven by Strongly Supercritical Convection in Rotating Spherical Shells,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 470, 2002, pp. 115-133. doi:10.1017/S0022112002002008
- P. Driscoll and P. Olson, “Superchron Cycles Driven by Variable Core Heat Flow,” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2011, p. L09304. doi:10.1029/2011GL046808
- G. A. Glatzmaier, R. S. Coe, L. Hongre and P. H. Roberts, “The Role of the Earth’s Mantle in Controlling the Frequency of Geo-magnetic Reversal,” Nature, Vol. 401, 1999, pp. 885-890. doi:10.1038/44776
- P. L. Olson, R. S. Coe, P. E. Driscoll, G. A. Glatzmaier and P. H. Roberts, “Geody-namo Reversal Frequency and Heterogeneous Core-Mantle Boundary Heat Flow,” Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 180, No. 1-2, 2010, pp.66-79. doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2010.02.010
- I. Melbourne, M. R. E. Proctor and A. M. Rucklidge, “A Heteroclinic Model of Geodynamo Reversals and Excursions,” Dy-namo and Dynamics, a Mathematical Challenge, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Vol. 26, 2001, pp. 363-370.doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0788-7_43
- D. A. Ryan and G. R. Sarson, “Are Geomagnetic Reversals Controlled by Turbulence within the Earth's core?” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 34, 2007, p. L02307. doi:10.1029/2006GL028291
- C. Narteau, J. L. Le Mouel, M. Shnirman, E. Blanter and C. Allegre, “Reversal Sequence in a Multiple Scale Dynamo Mechanism,” Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 120, No. 4, 2000, pp. 271-287. doi:10.1016/S0031-9201(00)00145-X
- C. Narteau and J. L. Le Mouel, “Transient Evolution Regimes in a Multiscale Dynamo Model: Timescales of the Reversal Mechanism,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 110, 2005. p.B01104. doi:10.1029/2004JB002983
- D. Volobuev, “Toy Dy-namo to Describe the Long-Term Solar Activity Cycles,” Solar Physics, Vol. 238, No. 2, 2006, pp. 421-430. doi:10.1007/s11207-006-0154-x