Employing Diversity and Similarity Indices to Evaluate Geopedological Soil Mapping in Miyaneh, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran
- 1 Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
- 2 Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
- 3 Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The geopedological viewpoint attempts to distinguish and introduce the smallest map unit that has the highest levels of homogeneity and uniformity with respect to landform, lithology, and soil, especially if the relationship between geomorphology and soils in the region is well defined. This research intended to investigate the degree of validity generalization of results obtained in the geopedology approach for similar landforms in the Miayneh region of East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. For this purpose, soil diversity study was conducted through measuring it in a hierarchical sequence in categories of USDA soil taxonomy and by comparing similar units in the geopedological method through employing pedodiversity and similarity indices. After preparing the initial interpretative map (based on aerial photographs) at a scale of 1:20 , 000, the HPu211 unit that covered the greatest delineation of study area was selected and 28 soil profiles, about 90 meters apart, were excavated, described, and sampled in this unit. The degree of validity generalization of geopedological results for the mentioned unit was determined by digging 14 other soil profiles in a similar unit, called the validation area, which was located outside of the sample area. Results indicated that the value of Shannon’s diversity index increased from the level of soil order to soil family in both the sample and the generalization areas; however, only at the soil family level were there significant differences between soil diversity in the two areas at the confidence level of 95%. As well as classification of the profiles dug in the generalization area was different from that of the profiles dug in the sample area at the category of soil family. Therefore, it is possible that management generalizability in this method, even at the detailed scale, can satisfy the related needs. Consequently, interpretative or managerial purity of geopedological units must be considered in future research.
- Rossiter, D.G. (2000) Lecture Notes and Reference Methodology for Soil Resource Inventories. Second Revised Version, Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation), Enschede.
- Zinck, J.A. (1989) Physiography and Soils, Lecture Notes for Soil Students. Soil Science Division, Soil Survey Courses Subject Matter, Enschede, The Netherlands.
- Rossiter, D.G., Girma, A., Henneman, R. and Siderus, W. (2001) Summary of Investigation, 1997-2000 by ITC. Technical Report, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, Soil Science Division, The Netherlands, 31 p.
- Saldana, A. (2016) Geopedology, A Tool for Soil-Geoform Pattern Analysis. Springer, Berlin, 239-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19159-1_14
- Dent, D. and Young, A. (1981) Soil Survey and Land Evaluation. Georg Allen and Unwin Publishers, London.
- Western, S. (1978) Soil Survey Contracts and Quality Control. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
- Zhu, J.X., Hudson, B., Burt, J., Lubich, K. and Simonson, D. (2001) Soil Mapping Using GIS, Expert Knowledge and Fuzzy Logic. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 65, 1463-1472. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.6551463x
- Esfandiarpoor Borujeni, I., Toomanian, N., Salehi, M.H. and Mohammadi, J. (2009) Assessing Geopedological Soil Mapping Using Diversity and Similarity Indices (A Case Study: Borujen Area, Chaharmahal-Va-Bakhtiari Province). Journal of Water and Soil, 23, 100-114. [In Persian with English Abstract]
- Sharma, V.A.K. (2006) Mapping of the Soil. Science Publishers, New Hampshire.
- Guo, Y., Gong, P. and Amundson, R. (2003) Pedodiversity in the United States of America. Geoderma, 117, 99-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00137-X
- Ibanez, J.J., De Alba, S. and Bermudes, F.F. and Garsia-Alvarez, A. (1995) Pedodiversity: Concepts and Measurements. Catena, 24, 215-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(95)00028-Q
- McBratney, A.B. and Minasny, B. (2007) On Measuring Pedodiversity. Geoderma, 141, 149-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.05.012
- Ibanez, J.J., De Alba, S., lobo, A. and Zucarello, V. (1998) Pedodiversity and Global Soil Patterns at Coarse Scales (with Discussion). Geoderma, 83, 171-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00147-X