The Analysis of Scientific and Commercial Softwares Accuracy in GPS Observation Processing
- 1 Master of Geodesy and Lecturer, Islamic Azad University, Rafsanjan Branch, Rafsanjan, Iran
- 2 Master of Geodesy, Lecturer and Head of Department of Geomatics Engineering at Sama College, Ardabil Branch, Ardabil, Iran
Abstract
The engineers use various softwares for observation processing and GPS networks, generally everyone who uses a device, he uses softwares with the same brand for the processing of it GPS processing networks by defined default parameters and models. The most outstanding issue is that, it should be understood, the application of which kinds of softwares will help us to gain the desirable accuracy and whether the accuracy of coordinate estimation is acceptable in all commercial softwares or not. In this article, we compared a series of softwares which engineers use for their data processing with powerful scientific software that meanwhile it is too hard and time consuming to learn it. We have considered accuracy and validity of scientific software, which gives acceptable results, as a baseline to see how much errors and difference is between this software and the commercial softwares, so we selected Bernese as a scientific software and LGO, Ashtech Solutions, CGO softwares as commercial softwares and we analyzed them and compared the applied models of the softwares with each other. To do so, we choose a GPS network from Tehran city and discussed it, in order to evaluate the measured accuracy for baselines and also coordinate system that after data processing, it was understood that if the polygon of a network is small, commercial softwares can be utilized with very high acceptable accuracies and even by Ephemerides Precise data, their accuracy will increase more, but if our network is more extended and bigger, there is no other choice except using scientific softwares to calculate coordinate that performs a processing by many parameters.
- Instructions for Using the Software (2013) Bernese, Leica Geo Office, Ashtech Solutions. CHC Geomatics Office.
- Wang, J., Satirapod, C. and Rizos, C. (2002) Stochastic Assessment of GPS Carrier Phase Measurements for Precise Static Relative Positioning. Journal of Geodesy, 76, 95-104.
- Sun, H., Slaughtera, D.C., Pérez Ruizb, M., Glievera, C., Upadhyayaa, S.K. and Smith, R.F. (2010) RTK GPS Mapping of Transplanted Row Crops. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 71, 32-37.
- Amirkhani, M. (2012) Determination of the Effect of Troposphere Zenith for Two-Frequencies-GPS on Ship. MSc Thesis, University of Tehran, Iran.
- Choy, S., Zhang, K. and Silcock, D. (2008) An Evaluation of Various Ionospheric Error Mitigation Methods Used in Single Frequency PPP. Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 7, 62-71.
- Yuan, Y., Huo, X. and Ou, J. (2007) Models and Methods for Precise Determination of Ionospheric Delay Using GPS. Progress in Natural Science, 2, 187-196.
- Chen, K. and Gao, Y. (2005) Real-Time Precise Point Positioning Using Single Frequency Data. Proceedings of the IONGNSS 18th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division, Long Beach, 13-16 September 2005, 1514-1523.
- Bland, J.M. and Altman, D.G. (1986) Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. Journal of Lancet, 327, 307-310.
- Abd-Elazeem, M., Farah, A. and Farrag, A.F. (2011) Assessment Study of Using Online (CSRS) GPS-PPP Service for Mapping Applications in Egypt. Journal of Geodetic Science, 1, 233-239.
- Montazeri, A. and Tahriri, A. (1386) The Analysis and Processing of GPS Data by PINNACLE Software. Zaban Tasvir, Tehran.
- Daho, S.A.B. (2010) Precision Assessment of the Orthometric Heights Determination in Northern Part of Algeria by Combining the GPS Data and the Local Geoid Model. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 342, 87-94.
- Péreza, J.L., Mozasa, A.T., Lópeza, A., Aguilarb, B.F.J., Delgadoa, J., Fernándezb, I. and Aguilarb, M.A. (2012) Efficient Methods to Convert LiDAR-Derived Ellipsoid Heights to Orthometric Heights. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, 573-578.