Simulation of Petrophysical Parameters of Asmari Reservoir Using SGS Method in Mansuri Oil Field, Southwest of Iran
- 1 Department of Oil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Gachsaran Branch, Gachsaran, Iran
- 2 Department of Oil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Gachsaran Branch, Gachsaran, Iran
Abstract
Porosity and water saturations are the most important petrophysical parameters of hydrocarbon reservoirs that accurate assessment of them in hydrocarbon reservoirs is an effective tool, important and efficient for industry experts, in the context of a comprehensive study of reservoirs and production and management process of reservoir. In this study, using data from five wells of Mansuri oil field, and using the sequential simulation Gaussian method and using Petrel software, the trend of Porosity and water saturation changes in the mentioned field for four zones was simulated. Also the average maps for each zone have been created that results of the simulation parameters in this map showed that highest average porosity is 0.1401 and 0.2756 at least saturation of water is related to zone 1. Finally result of the simulation indicates the Zone 1 is of the best reservoir Zones.
- Doveton, J.H. (1994) Geologic Log Analysis Using Computer Methods: Computer Application in Geology. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa.
- Yeten, B. and Gumrah, F. (2000) The Use of Fractal Neural Networks Artificial Geostatistics for Carbonate Reservoir Characterization. Journal of Transport in Porous Media, 41, 173-195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006725709303
- Robinson, A. and Griffiths, P. (2008) The Future of Geological Modeling in Hydrocarbon Development. 2th Ed., Geological Society.
- Clayton, V. (2002) Geostatistical Reservoir Modeling. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Kaufmman, O. and Martin, T. (2008) 3D Geological Modeling from Boreholes, Cross-Sections and Geological Maps, Application over Former Natural Gas Storages in Coal Mines. Journal of Computers & Geosciences, 34, 278-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.09.005
- Eisinger, C.L. and Jensen, J.L. (2009) Data Integration, Petrophysics, and Geomodelling. University of Calgary, Calgary.
- Diggle, P.J. and Ribeiro, P.J. (2007) Model-Based Geostatistics. Springer Science, Library of Congress.
- Holden, L., Mostad, P., Nielsen, B.F., Gjered, J., Townsend, C. and Ottesen, S. (2003) Stochastic Structural Modeling. Journal of Mathematical Geology, 35, 899-914. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MATG.0000011584.51162.69
- Randen, T. (2008) Mathematical Methods and Modelling in Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production (Mathematics in Industry). Schlumberger Stavanger Research.
- Bahar, A. and Kelkar, M. (2000) Journey from Well Logs/Cores to Integrated Geological and Petrophysical Properties Simulation: A Methodology and Application. SPE Paper 39565, First Presented at the SPE India Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, New Delhi, India.
- Etminan, A.H. and Seifi, A. (2008) An Improved Model for Geostatistical Simulation of Fracture Parameters and Their Effects on Static and Dynamic Models. International Conference on Engineering Optimization, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1-5 June 2008. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874834100801010047
- Amanipoor, H., Ghafoori, M. and Lashkaripour, G.R. (2013) The Application of Geostatistical Methods to Prepare the 3D Petrophysical Model of Oil Reservoir. Open Journal of Geology, 3, 7-18.