Prospective Assessment of the Rockall Risk Scoring System in Egyptian Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- 1 Department of Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
- 2 Department of Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
- 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
- 4 Department of Community, Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
- 5 Department of Tropical Medicine, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Background: One of the major challenges in managing acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding involves the identification of patients who are at high risk of rebleeding and death; conversely, the identification of patients who are suitable for early discharge and outpatient endoscopy is also important for effective resource. The use of Rockall system has been shown to represent accurate and valid predictor of rebleeding and death. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate validity of Rockall score for prediction of rebleeding and mortality in Egyptian patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients and Methods: 50 patients presented with upper GI bleeding were subjected to detailed clinical, laboratory, sonographic and endoscopic examination together with Rockall score calculation. Results: According to the findings of upper GI endoscopy patients were further subdivided into two subgroups as follows: Group 1 (n = 32): Patients with portal hypertension manifested by variceal bleeding and/or portal hypertensive gastropathy; and Group 2 (n = 18): other causes of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (peptic ulcer disease, Mallory Weiss syndrome…). Clinical condition of the patients was assessed after 48 hours and mortality was recorded. Rockall score was the highest in mortality group, and higher in rebleeding group than stable group (P < 0.01). Rockall score was higher in Child C than Child B and Child A among hepatic patients (P < 0.01). The cutoff value of Rockall score = 3.5 was the best for prediction of rebleeding with sensitivity 100%, specificity 53%, while the cutoff value = 6.5 was the best for prediction of mortality with sensitivity 100% and 93.5% specificity. Conclusion: Rockall score is clinically useful in prediction of rebleeding and mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. It can accurately differentiate between patients with stable condition that could be discharged from hospital and those who require hospitalization and this could help to minimize hospital stay and cost.
- Van Leerdam, M.E. (2008) Epidemiology of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Best Practice Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 22, 209-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2007.10.011
- Enestvedt, B.K., Gralnek, I.M., Mattek, N., Lieberman, D.A. and Eisen, G. (2008) An Evaluation of Endoscopic Indications and Findings Related to Nonvariceal Upper-GI Hemorrhage in a Large Multicenter Consortium. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 67, 422-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.09.024
- Charatcharoenwitthaya, P., Pausawasdi, N., Laosanguaneak, N., Bubthamala, J., Tanwandee, T. and Leelakusolvong, S. (2011) Characteristics and Outcomes of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Therapeutic Endoscopy in the Elderly. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 17, 3724-3732. http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i32.3724
- Hearnshaw, S., Logan, R., Lowe, D., Travis, S.P., Murphy, M.F. and Palmer, K.R. (2011) Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the UK: Patient Characteristics, Diagnoses and Outcomes in the 2007 UK Audit. Gut, 60, 1327-1335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.228437
- Rockall, T.A., Logan, R.F., Devlin, H.B. and Northfield, T. (1997) Influencing the Practice and Outcome in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. Steering Committee of the National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. Gut, 41, 606-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.41.5.606
- Vreeburg, E.M., Terwee, C.B., Snel, P., Rauws, E.A., Bartelsman, J.F., Meulen, J.H. and Tytgat, G.N. (1999) Validation of the Rockall Risk Scoring System in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Gut, 44, 331-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.44.3.331
- Ali, H., Lang, E. and Barkan, A. (2012) Emergency Department Risk Stratification in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. CJEM, 14, 45-49.
- Lahiff, C., Shields, W., Cretu, I., Mahmud, N., McKiernan, S., Norris, S., Silke, B., Reynolds, J.V. and O’Toole, D. (2012) Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Predictors of Risk in a Mixed Patient Group including Variceal and Nonvariceal Haemorrhage. European Journal of Gastroenterology Hepatology, 24, 149-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834e37d6
- Rockall, T.A., Logan, R.F., Devlin, H.B. and Northfield, T. (1996) Risk Assessment after Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. Gut, 38, 316-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.38.3.316
- Rockall, T.A., Logan, R.F., Devlin, H.B. and Northfield, T. (1996) Selection of Patients for Early Discharge or Outpatient Care after Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. Lancet, 347, 1138-1140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90607-8