Does Anesthesiologist-Directed Sedation Afford Superior Deep Cannulation Rates and Procedural Outcomes for ERCP in the Community Setting?
- 1 Rockford Gastroenterology Associates, Rockford, IL, USA
- 2 Rockford Gastroenterology Associates, Rockford, IL, USA
- 3 University of Illinois College of Medicine Rockford, Rockford, IL, USA
- 4 University of Illinois College of Medicine Rockford, Rockford, IL, USA
- 5 University of Illinois College of Medicine Rockford, Rockford, IL, USA
- 6 University of Illinois College of Medicine Rockford, Rockford, IL, USA
- 7 Rockford Gastroenterology Associates, Rockford, IL, USA
- 8 University of Illinois College of Medicine Rockford, Rockford, IL, USA
- 9 University of Illinois College of Medicine Rockford, Rockford, IL, USA
Abstract
Aim: To compare outcomes by sedation class in community patients undergoing index endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Methods: Nineteen hundred sixteen consecutive patients underwent ERCP from May 2005 to May 2011. Eight hundred thirty seven patients were excluded due to prior papillary intervention or attempted ERCP. A total of 1079 patients were included. The 981 patients who underwent gastroenterologist directed sedation (GDS) served as the control population, while the 98 patients who received anesthesiologist directed sedation (ADS) served as the case population. Medical records were analyzed for patient demographics, procedure indication, adverse events, case complexity, procedural failure and sedation failure. Case complexity was defined by the grading system proposed by the working party of the ASGE Quality Committee. Sedation failure was defined by agitation or airway compromise prompting termination of the ERCP. Reasons for procedural failure included surgically altered anatomy, luminal obstruction, and technical failure. Study endpoint was defined as successful deep cannulation of the intended target duct. Results: Demographic distribution did not differ between the GDS and the ADS groups. Cannulation success rates were similar between the two groups, with 89.85% in the GDS group, and 89.58% in the ADS group (P = 0.864). There were no statistical differences between sedation groups in procedural or respiratory adverse events. Technical failure was the predominant basis for deep cannulation failure in both groups. Agitation and airway compromise accounted for deep cannulation failure similarly in both groups. The need for reversal agents was low but similar in both groups. There was no statistical advantage in deep cannulation success rate by complexity grade in either sedation class. Conclusion: Excellent procedural outcomes and low adverse event rates were achieved using GDS, a more accessible and cost-effective method in a community-based setting.
- Rabinov, K.R. and Simon, M. (1965) Peroral Cannulation of the Ampulla of Vater for Direct Cholangiography and Pancreatography: Preliminary Report of a New Method. Radiology, 85, 693-697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/85.4.693
- Classen, M. and Demling, L. (1974) Endoskopische sphinkterotomie der papilla vateri und steinextracktion aus dem ductus choledochus. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 99, 496-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1107790
- Kawai, K., Akasaka, Y., Murakami, K., Tada, M., Kohli, Y. and Nakajima, M. (1974) Endoscopic Sphincterotomy of the Ampulla of Vater. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 20, 148-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(74)73914-1
- Coelho-Prabhu, N., Shah, N., Houten, H., Kameth, P.S. and Baron, T.H. (2013) Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Utilisation and Outcomes in a 10-Year Population-Based Cohort. BMJ Open, 3, Article ID: e002689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002689
- Andriulli, A., Silvano, L., Napolitano, G., Niro, G., Valvano, M.R., Spirito, F., Pilotto, A. and Forlano, R. (2007) Incidence Rates of Post-ERCP Complications: Asystematic Survey of Prospective Studies. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 102, 1781-1788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x
- Varadarajulu, S., Kilgore, M., Wilcox, C. and Eloubeidi, M.A. (2006) Relationship among Hospital Volume, Length of Stay, and Technical Outcomes. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 64, 338-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.05.016
- Cotton, P. and Frakes, J.T. (2013) Medicolegal Issues in ERCP. In: Baron, T.H., Kozarek, R. and Carr-Locke, D.L., Eds., A Practical Guide to ERCP, Elsevier Ltd., London, 92-102.
- Kachaamy, T.A. and Faigel, D.O. (2013) Improving ERCP Quality and Decreasing Risk to Patients and Providers. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 7, 531-540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/17474124.2013.824703
- Martindale, S.J. (2006) Anaesthetic Considerations during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 34, 475-480.
- Lordan, J., Woods, J., Keeling, P. and Paterson, I.M. (2011) A Retrospective Analysis of Benzodiazepine Sedation vs. Propofol Anaesthesia in 252 Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. Hepato Pancreato Biliary, 13, 174-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00266.x
- Garewal, D., Powell, S., Milan, S.J., Nordmeyer, J. and Waikar, P. (2012) Sedative Techniques for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6, Article ID: CD007274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007274.pub2