Perceptions on the Implementation of the Philippine Development Plan in Ensuring Efficient Governance
- 1 Graduate School, University of Baguio, Baguio, Philippines
Abstract
The Philippine Development Plan enables the government to come up with a shared vision of where the country should be in the future and a concerted program of action to achieve this vision guaranteeing that government resources are channeled to tangible programs, projects, and activities that best achieve the country’s goals and objectives. The main objective of this study is to determine how the status of health-related programs under the Philippine Development Plan is perceived by people in the community, especially before and after its implementation. Findings revealed three significant changes in the health-related programs under Philippine Development Plan Implementation. First, public affairs promote transparency in the municipality by presenting the accomplishment of each division in the Local Government Unit as a part of good public affairs practices. Second, more health projects were implemented and achieved; these are the established functional ESU and a decreased stunting prevalence rate) by being responsive to the needs of its citizens and increasing their awareness to establish their relationship with the general public. Lastly is compliance with the plan, as many health-related programs were implemented and achieved in line with the objectives of the Philippine Development Plan in the municipality. With these findings, the researcher recommends that integrity in all government offices and staff must always be maintained, as this affects the overall effectiveness of governance and could erode public trust in a split second.
- Administrative Order 2019-0027 (2019, August 7). Guidelines on the Implementation of the Local Government Unit Health Scorecard. https://dmas.doh.gov.ph:8083/Rest/GetFile?id=639584
- Administrative Order 2021-0057 (2021). Revised Guidelines on the Philippine Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (PIDSR). https://dmas.doh.gov.ph:8083/Rest/GetFile?id=699251
- Article 1000 (2021). Distinction between Public and Private Administration. https://article1000.com/distinction-between-public-and-private-administration/
- Bontá, D., & Meredith C. (2009). Governance and Management of Public Health Programmes.
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (2022). Content Analysis. https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/research/population-health-methods/content-analysis
- Corruption Report (2009). Global Corruption Report 2009: Corruption and the Private Sector. https://www.transparency.org/en/publications/global-corruption-report-2009
- Course Hero (2022). Philippine Development Plan 2017-2022. https://www.coursehero.com/file/78378673/Philippine-Development-Plan-2017-2022-Reaction-Paperdocx/
- Cuenca, J. (2020, December). Review of the “Build, Build, Build” Program: Implications on the Philippine Development Plan 2017-2022. https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps2054.pdf
- GovPh (2022). Chapter 7: Good Governance and the Rule of Law. https://pdp.neda.gov.ph/philippine-development-plan-2011-2016/chapter-7-good-governance-and-the-rule-of-law/
- Guardian (2021). Importance of Public Administration. https://www.zambianguardian.com/importance-of-public-administration/
- Holzer, M., & Newbold, S. P. (2020). A Call for Action: Public Administration, Public Policy, and Public Health Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic. The American Review of Public Administration, 50, 450-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020941666
- Mantaring, J. R. (2023, February 1). PH Ranks 116th in Global Corruption Index, Still among Significant Others. https://governance.neda.gov.ph/ph-ranks-116th-in-global-corruption-index-still-among-significant-decliners/#:~:text=Metro%20Manila%20(CNN%20Philippines%2C%20February,180%20countries%20and%20territories%20globally
- Mohammad, S. I., Mohammad, S. B., & Mohammad, F. S. (2019). Strengthening Local Government through Participation and Leadership: Bangladesh Perspective. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 11, 5-11. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPAPR2019.0444