The ABD Boot Camp Cohort Program: A Comprehensive Approach to Addressing Doctoral Attrition in Educational Leadership Using Tinto’s Theory of Student Involvement and Departure
- 1 Department of Education Practice and Leadership, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN, USA
Abstract
The doctoral degree completion rate in higher education across various disciplines has continued to decline. Currently, attrition rates by program vary from 40-60% across disciplines. This paper examines the implementation and outcomes of the All But Dissertation (ABD) Boot Camp Cohort Program within a Department of Educational Leadership at Tennessee State University. The program addressed a critical situation where nearly 100 students had completed coursework but not their dissertations. Through voluntary enrollment, 40 students opted to join the cohort. The program utilized Vincent Tinto’s Theory of Student Involvement and Departure as its theoretical framework, implementing structured monthly workshops, faculty mentorship, and comprehensive support systems, along with guided use of artificial intelligence tools. Results demonstrate significant success, with nearly 50% of participants (20 of the 40 students) completing dissertations or on track for completion by December 2025, compared to the pre-intervention graduation rate of 48% and the national average of 56% for EdD programs in Educational Leadership. The program’s success highlights the importance of academic and social integration, structured support, targeted interventions, and the innovative use of artificial intelligence tools in the dissertation process. This research contributes to understanding effective strategies for reducing doctoral attrition and provides a replicable model for institutions facing similar challenges.
- Ali, A., & Kohun, F. G. (2006). Dealing with Isolation Feelings in IS Doctoral Programs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 1, 021-033. https://doi.org/10.28945/58
- Aljuaid, H. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Tools on Academic Writing Instruction in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Arab World English Journal, 15, 123-140.
- Anthropic (2024). Claude (Version 3.5 Sonnet) [Large Language Model]. https://claude.ai/
- Bair, C. R., & Haworth, J. G. (2004). Doctoral Student Attrition and Persistence: A Meta-Synthesis of Research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (pp. 481-534). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2456-8_11
- Barnes, B. J. (2009). The Nature of Exemplary Doctoral Advisors’ Expectations and the Ways They May Influence Doctoral Persistence. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 11, 323-343. https://doi.org/10.2190/cs.11.3.b
- Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. (2020). Application and Theory Gaps during the Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, Article ID: 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
- Devos, C., Boudrenghien, G., Van der Linden, N., Azzi, A., Frenay, M., Galand, B. et al. (2017). Doctoral Students’ Experiences Leading to Completion or Attrition: A Matter of Sense, Progress and Distress. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32, 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0290-0
- Gardner, S. K. (2009). Student and Faculty Attributions of Attrition in High and Low-Completing Doctoral Programs in the United States. Higher Education, 58, 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9184-7
- Gardner, S. K., & Gopaul, B. (2012). The Part-Time Doctoral Student Experience. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 63-78. https://doi.org/10.28945/1561
- Golde, C. M. (2005). The Role of the Department and Discipline in Doctoral Student Attrition: Lessons from Four Departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 669-700. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2005.11772304
- Hrastinski, S., Olofsson, A. D., Arkenback, C., Ekström, S., Ericsson, E., Fransson, G. et al. (2019). Critical Imaginaries and Reflections on Artificial Intelligence and Robots in Postdigital K-12 Education. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00046-x