Survivors’ Perspectives of Organizational Downsizing on Knowledge Sharing in a Downsized Environment
- 1 School of Business, University of Phoenix, Phoenix, USA
Abstract
Organizational workforce reductions can negatively affect a company’s ability to preserve its knowledge base. The problem researched in this study was the perceived effect of downsizing on knowledge sharing among surviving employees. The purpose of this study was to determine the perceived effect of downsizing on knowledge sharing. Survivors’ knowledge sharing behavior was examined in relation to 1) survivor syndrome, 2) attitude towards knowledge sharing, and 3) perceived loss of knowledge power. A quantitative correlation research design was used to investigate the relationship between downsizing and knowledge sharing. A web-based survey was used to collect data. The convenience sample consisted of 37 management employees in the Texas region of a management consultant organization. Three sets of variables were examined: 1) survivor syndrome and actual knowledge sharing behavior, 2) survivors’ attitudes toward knowledge sharing and actual knowledge sharing behavior, and 3) perceived loss of knowledge power and actual knowledge sharing behavior. Findings from a Spearman rank order correlation revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between perceived loss of knowledge power and actual knowledge sharing behavior. Understanding survivors’ reactions can assist with planning for future reductions, and lead to the development of training programs to counter the challenges.
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Appelbaum, S. H., Close, T. G., & Klasa, S. (1999). Downsizing: An examination of some successes and more failures. Management Decision, 37, 424-436. doi:10.1108/00251749910274207
- Baltazar, H. (2001). Knowledge management has a human side. eWeek, 18, 74-79. http://eweek.com/c/a/IT-Management/Knowledge-Management-Has-a-Human-Side
- Bartlett, C. A., & Wozny, M. (2002). GE’s two-decade transformation: Jack Welch’s leadership. Allston, MA: Harvard Business School. http://hbr.org//product/ge-s-two-decade-transformation-jack-welch-s-leader
- Baruch, Y., & Hind, P. (1999). Perpetual motion in organizations: Effective management and the impact of the new psychological contracts on “survivor syndrome”. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 295-306. doi:10.1080/135943299398375
- Beagrie, S. (2005). How to manage demotivated employees. Personnel Today, 31-32. http://business.highbeam.com/410665/article-1G1-138757296
- Bhattacharya, S., & Chatterjee, L. (2005). Organizational downsizing: From concepts to practices. The Journal for Decision Makers, 30, 65-78. http://vikalpa.com/pdf/articles/2005/2005_july_sep_65_78.pdf
- Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know (pp. 1-7). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. http://wang.ist.psu.edu/course/05/IST597/papers/Davenport_know.pdf
- Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Fisher, S. R., & White, M. A. (1997). Downsizing and organizational learning: A question of compatibility. Academy of Management Proceedings, 25, 454-458. doi:10.5465/AMBPP.1997.4989390
- Ford, D. P. (2004). Knowledge sharing: Seeking to understand intentions and actual sharing. (Doctoral dissertation, University at Kingston, 2004). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66, 536.
- Gibbert, M., & Krause, H. (2002). Practice exchange in a best practice marketplace. In T. H. Davenport, & G. J. B. Probst (Eds.), Knowledge Management Case Book: Siemens Best Practices (pp. 89-105). Erlangen: Publicis Corporate Publishing.
- Henkoff, R. (1994). Getting beyond downsizing. Fortune, 129, 58-64. http://money.conn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1994/01/10/78843/index.htm