Leaders Exhibiting High Emotional Intelligence Are More Dedicated to Their Job Performance
- 1 School of Hospitality, Sport, and Recreation Management, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, USA
- 2 School of Hospitality, Sport, and Recreation Management, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, USA
- 3 Chaplin School of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Florida International University, North Miami, USA
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of information technology leaders’ emotional intelligence on subordinate job performance. Participants consisted of information technology leaders, and were recruited from the Association for Information Technology Professionals (AITP) and the Information Technology (IT) Specialist group in LinkedIn (a business-oriented network website). A quantitative, correlational approach was taken by an online administration of two validated instruments—the Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i) and Van Scotter and Motowidlo’s measures for contextual performance (interpersonal facilitation and job dedication). Findings indicated that there was a positive relationship between IT leaders’ emotional intelligence scores and subordinates’ job performance ratings. Specifically, higher IT leaders’ general mood scores, and optimism scores are associated with subordinates’ higher interpersonal facilitation and job dedication scores. Further, results provided insight on IT leaders’ EI training needs, career development, and guidelines for areas of improvement.
- Amazon (2010a). Emotional intelligence. URL (last checked 15 October 2010). http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=emotional+intelligence&x=4&y=20
- Association for Information Technology Professionals (AITP) (2010). About AITP. URL (last checked 12 November 2010). http://www.aitp.org/organization/about/mission/mission.jsp
- Bar-On, R. (1997). The emotional quotient inventory (EQ-i): A test of emotional intelligence. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
- Bernthal, P., & Wellins, R. (2006). Trends in leader development and succession. Human Resource Planning, 29, 31-40.
- Caruso, D. R., & Gentry, K. F. (2005). Why leadership fails. Business-IT Strategies Executive Update, 8, 1-3.
- Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 25-44. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00037-6
- Cooper, R. K. (1997). Applying emotional intelligence in the workplace. Training & Development, 51, 31-38.
- Coté, S., & Miners, C. T. H. (2006). Emotional intelligence, cognitive intelligence, and job performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 1-28.
- Creswell, J. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
- Daus, C. S., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2005). The case for an ability-based model of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 453-466. doi:10.1002/job.321
- Dawda, D., & Hart, S. D. (2000). Assessing emotional intelligence: Reliability and validity of the Bar-On emotional quotient inventory (EQ-i) in university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 797-812. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00139-7
- Fambrough, M. J., & Hart, R. K. (2008). Emotions in leadership development: A critique of emotional intelligence. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 740-758. doi:10.1177/1523422308323542
- Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Los Angelos, CA: Sage.
- George, J. M. (2000). Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations, 53, 1027-1055. doi:10.1177/0018726700538001
- Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 368-384. doi:10.2307/20159587