Investigating the Organizational Citizenship Behaviours of Hotel Business Employees through Structural Equation Modelling: A Study in Rize Province — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Investigating the Organizational Citizenship Behaviours of Hotel Business Employees through Structural Equation Modelling: A Study in Rize Province
Open Education Faculty, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
The aim of this research is to identify organizational citizenship behaviours of employees working in hotels operating in Rize. To this end, a questionnaire was applied to 228 employees working in these hotels. The gathered data were analysed with LISREL program. Positive significant differences were found between factors of organizational citizenship behaviours as a result of confirmatory factor analysis which was carried out to identify research participants’ organizational citizenship behaviours. It is identified that the most effective variables on Altruism factor by 0.87 are “I help an employee learn the tasks who has just started the job” and “I do not refrain from sharing materials I have with the business employees for work related problems”; the most effective variable on conscientiousness factor by 0.84 is “I want to participate in all activities that create positive image for my organization”; the most effective variable on courtesy factor by 0.88 is “I warn other employees not be harmed when unexpected problems arise”; the most effective variable on sportsmanship factor by 0.68 is “I take active role in the resolution of conflicts occurring in my organization”; and the most effective variable on civic virtue factor by 0.86 is “I keep up with changes in the structure of my organization”. In addition, conscientiousness factor and sportsmanship factor have an effect of 0.99 between each other.
George, J. M., & Br1ef, A. P. (1992). Feel1ng Good-Do1ng Good: A Conceptual Analys1s of the Mood at Work-Organiza tional Spontane1ty Relat1onsh1p. Psycholog1cal Bullet1n, 112, 310-329. http://dx.do1.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.310
Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (2000). Behav1or 1n Organ1zat1ons (7th ed.). Upper Saddle R1ver, NJ: Prent1ce-Hall.
GÖk, E. E. (2007). ÖrgÜtsel KÜltÜr Baglam1nda ÖrgÜtsel Vatandasl1k Olgusu Ve B1r Arast1rma. Yay1nlanmam1s YÜksek L1sans Tez1, Den1zl1: Pamukkale Ün1vers1tes1.
Kalkan, A. (2013). Alg1lanan ÖrgÜt KÜltÜrÜnÜn ÖrgÜtsel Vatandasl1k Davran1s1 Üzer1ndek1 Etk1s1: Kuramsal Ve GÖrgÜl B1r Arast1rma. Konya: SelÇuk Ün1vers1tes1.
Karaaslan, A., Özler, E. D., & Vekulakl1oglu, S. A. (2009). ÖrgÜtsel Vatandasl1k Davran1s1 Ve B1lg1 Paylas1m1 Aras1ndak11l1sk1ye YÖnel1k B1r Arast1rma. Afyon Kocatepe Ün1vers1tes1 1kt1sad1 Ve1dar1 B1l1mler FakÜltes1 Derg1s1, 1, 135-160.
MacKenz1e, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1993). The 1mpact of Organ1zat1onal C1t1zensh1p Behav1or on Evaluat1ons of Salaesperson Performance. Journal of Market1ng, 57, 70-80. http://dx.do1.org/10.2307/1252058
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organ1zat1onal C1t1zensh1p Behav1or: The Good Sold1er Syndrome. Lex1ngton, England: Lex1ngton Books.
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organ1zat1onal C1t1zensh1p Behav1or: 1t’s Construct Clean-Up T1me. Human Performance, 10, 85-97. http://dx.do1.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A Meta-Analyt1c Rev1ew of Att1tud1nal and D1spos1t1onal Pred1ctors of Organ1zat1onal C1t1zensh1p Behav1or. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802. http://dx.do1.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x
Özyer, K., Orhan, U., & DÖnmez Orhan, D. (2012). Demograf1k Özell1kler1n ÖrgÜtsel Vatandasl1k Davran1s1n1n Alt Boyutlar1 1le 1l1sk1s1: Bankac1l1k SektÖrÜnde B1r Uygulama. Dokuz EylÜl Ün1vers1tes1 1kt1sad1ve 1dar1 B1l1mler FakÜltes1 Derg1s1, 27, 181-204.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenz1e, S. B., Moorman, H. R., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformat1onal Leader Behav1ors and The1r Effects on Followers’ Trust 1n Leader, Sat1sfact1on, and Organ1zat1onal C1t1zensh1p Behav1ors. Leadersh1p Quarterly, 1, 107-142. http://dx.do1.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenz1e, S. B., Pa1ne, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organ1zat1onal C1t1zensh1p Behav1ors: A Cr1t1cal Rev1ew of the Theoret1cal and Emp1r1cal L1terature and Suggest1ons for Future Research. Journal of Management, 26, 513-563. http://dx.do1.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
Schappe, S. P. (1998). The 1nfluence of Job Sat1sfact1on, Organ1zat1onal Comm1tment, and Fa1rness Percept1ons on Organ1zat1onal C1t1zensh1p Behav1or. The Journal of Psychology, 132, 277-290. http://dx.do1.org/10.1080/00223989809599167
Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluat1ng the F1t of Structural Equat1on Models: Test of S1gn1f1cance and Descr1pt1ve Goodness-of-F1t Measures. Methods of Psycholog1cal Research Onl1ne, 8, 23-74.
Sezg1n, F. (2005). ÖrgÜtsel Vatandasl1k Davran1slar1: Kavramsal B1r ÇÖzÜmlemeve Okul A߇s1ndan Baz1 ߇kar1mlar. Gaz1 Eg1t1m FakÜltes1 Derg1s1, 25, 317-339.
SÖkmen, A., & Boylu, Y. (2011). ÖrgÜtsel Vatandasl1k Davran1s1 C1ns1yete GÖre Farkl1l1k GÖster1r M1? Otel 1sletmeler1 A߇s1ndan B1r Degerlend1rme. Gaz1antep Ün1vers1tes1 Sosyal B1l1mler Derg1s1, 10, 147-163. http://sbe.gantep.edu.tr
SÜmer, N. (2000). Yap1sal Es1tl1k Modeller1 Temel Kavramlar Ve Örnek Uygulama. TÜrk Ps1koloj1 Yaz1lar1, 3, 49-73.
Sah1n, A., Cankurt, M., GÜnden, C., & Vem1ran, B. (2008). ߇ft߇ler1n R1sk Davran1slar1: B1r Yap1sal Es1tl1k Model1 Uygulamas1. DokuzeylÜl Ün1vers1tes1 1kt1sad1 Ve1dar1 B1l1mler FakÜltes1 Derg1s1, 23, 153-172.
Sehr1banoglu, S. (2005). Yap1sal Es1tl1k Modeller1ve B1r Uygulama. YÜksek L1sans Tez1, YÜzÜncÜ Y1l Ün1vers1tes1, Fen B1l1mler1 Enst1tÜsÜ, Van.
Tas߇, D., & KoÇ, U. (2007). ÖrgÜtsel Vatandasl1k Davran1s1-ÖrgÜtsel Ögrenme Degerler1 1l1sk1s1: Akadem1syenler Üzer1nde GÖrgÜl B1r Arast1rma. Anadolu Ün1vers1tes1 Sosyal B1l1mler Derg1s1, 7, 373-382.
ÜnÜvar, T. G. (2006). An 1ntegrat1ve Model of Job Character1st1cs, Job Sat1sfact1on, Organ1zat1onal Comm1tment, Andorgan1zat1onal C1t1zensh1p Behav1or. Ankara: Ortadogu Tekn1k Ün1vers1tes1, Sosyal B1l1mler Enst1tÜsÜ, Yay1mlanmam1s YÜksek L1sansTez1.
Vey, M. A., & Campbell, J. P. (2004). 1n-Role or Extra-Role Organ1zat1onal C1t1zensh1p Behav1or: Wh1ch Are We Measuring? Human Performance, 17, 119-135. http://dx.do1.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1701_6
Yes1ltas, M., & Keles, Y. (2009). 1sgÖrenler1ne Eg1t1m DÜzeyler1 ve ÖrgÜtsel Vatandasl1k Davran1slar1 Aras1ndak1 1l1sk1n1n 1ncelenmes1ne YÖnel1k B1r Arast1rma. Gaz1 Ün1vers1tes1 1kt1sad1ve 1dar1 B1l1mler FakÜltes1 Derg1s1, 11, 17-40.
Y1lmaz, V., & Çel1k, H. E. (2005). Bankac1l1k SektÖrÜnde MÜster1 Memnun1yet1ve BankayaBagl1l1kAras1ndak11l1sk1n1nYap1salEs1tl1k Model1 1le Arast1r1lmas1., V11. Ulusal Ekonometr1ve 1stat1st1k Sempozyumu, 1stanbul Ün1vers1tes1.
War1s, R. G. (2005). An Exam1nat1on of Organ1zat1onal Culture, Employee Att1tudes, and Organ1zat1onal C1t1zensh1p Behav1ors: A Path Analys1s Approach. Kansas C1ty: Um1.
W1ll1ams, S., & Sh1aw, W. T. (1999). Mood and Organ1zat1onal C1t1zensh1p Behav1or: The Effects of Pos1t1ve Affect on Employee Organ1zat1onal C1t1zensh1p Behav1or 1ntent1ons. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 656-668. http://dx.do1.org/10.1080/00223989909599771