Conservation projects have limited resources and an ever expanding to-do list, presenting a significant leadership challenge. Mid-term evaluations can be informative tools to check how short term activities and resources are achieving long term conservation outcomes. This research study involved a programme evaluation of a successful species recovery project in Mauritius, using a systems-thinking approach to conservation management, and utilising a Theory of Change to assess the effectiveness of short term activities on long term impacts. This systematic method of evaluation gave greater clarity on resource planning, performance indicators and supporting processes, with observations that could be incorporated into ongoing plans. Such an approach could be used by funding organisations or by local management teams to review project performance without the need for a comparator, extensive benchmark data, nor a prescriptive management standards framework.
KeywordsConservation BiologySystems ThinkingEvaluationTheory of ChangeEffectiveness
Addison, P. F. E., de Bie, K., & Rumpff, L. (2015). Setting Conservation Management Thresholds Using a Novel Participatory Modeling Approach. Conservation Biology, 29, 1411-1422. http://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12544
Birdlife International (2015). Foudia rubra. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2014.32006
Black, S. A. (2015). System Behaviour Charts Inform an Understanding of Biodiversity Recovery. International Journal of Ecology, 2015, 1-6. http://doi.org/10.1155/2015/787925
Black, S. A., & Copsey, J. (2014). Does Deming’s “System of Profound Knowledge” Apply to Leaders of Biodiversity Conservation? Open Journal of Leadership, 3, 53-65. http://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2014.32006
Black, S. A., & Groombridge, J. (2010). Use of a Business Excellence Model to Improve Conservation Programs. Conservation Biology, 24, 1448-1458. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01562.x
Black, S. A., Groombridge, J. J., & Jones, C. G. (2011). Leadership and Conservation Effectiveness: Finding a Better Way to Lead. Conservation Letters, 4, 329-339. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00184.x
Black, S. A., Groombridge, J. J., & Jones, C. G. (2013). Using Better Management Thinking to Improve Conservation Effectiveness. ISRN Biodiversity, 2013, 1-8. http://doi.org/10.1155/2013/784701
Black, S. A., Meredith, H. M. R., & Groombridge, J. J. (2011). Biodiversity Conservation: Applying New Criteria to Assess Excellence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22, 1165-1178. http://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.624766
Bottrill, M. C., Hockings, M., & Possingham, H. P. (2011). In Pursuit of Knowledge: Addressing Barriers to Effective Conservation Evaluation. Ecology and Society, 16, 14.
Bruyere, B. L. (2015). Giving Direction and Clarity to Conservation Leadership. Conservation Letters, 8, 378-382. http://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12174
Concannon, L. (2014). Managing Threatened Species: Understanding the Factors Limiting the Recovery of the Endangered Pink Pigeon. PhD Thesis, Reading: Centre for Agri-Environmental Research with the School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading.
Cook, C. N., de Bie, K., Keith, D. A., & Addison, P. F. E. (2016). Decision Triggers Are a Critical Part of Evidence-Based Conservation. Biological Conservation, 195, 46-51. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.024
Cristinacce, A., Garrett, L. J. H., Cole, R. E., Tatayah, R. V. V., & Jones, C. G. (2010). Nesting Success of a Managed Population of Mauritius Fodies Foudia rubra Marooned on a Partially Restored Island. Bird Conservation International, 20, 365-374. http://doi.org/10.1017/S095927090999027X
Cristinacce, A., Handschuh, M., Switzer, R., Cole, R. E., Tatayah, V., Jones, C. G., & Bell, D. (2009). The Release and Establishment of Mauritius Fodies Foudia rubra on Ile Aux Aigrettes, Mauritius. Conservation Evidence, 6, 1-5.
Cristinacce, A., Ladkoo, A., Switzer, R., Jordan, L., Vencatasamy, V., Koenig, F. D. R., & Bell, D. (2008). Captive Breeding and Rearing of Critically Endangered Mauritius Fodies Foudia rubra for Reintroduction. Zoo Biology, 27, 255-268. http://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20182
Cullen, R., & White, P. C. L. (2013). Interdisciplinarity in Biodiversity Project Evaluation: A Work in Progress. Wildlife Research, 40, 163-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR12205
Ferraro, P. J., & Pattanayak, S. K. (2006). Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments. PLoS Biology, 4, e105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105
Ferriere, C., & Baboorun, T. (2014). Mauritius Fody Annual Report 2013-2014. Unpublished Report to the Mauritian Wildlife Foundation.
Ferriere, C., & Baboorun, T. (2015). Mauritius Fody Recovery Programme Annual Report 2014-2015 Season. Unpublished Report to the Mauritian Wildlife Foundation.
Garrett, L. J. H., Jones, C. G., Cristinacce, A., & Bell, D. J. (2007). Competition or Co-Existence of Reintroduced, Critically Endangered Mauritius Fodies and Invasive Madagascar Fodies in Lowland Mauritius? Biological Conservation, 140, 19-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.018
Hotopp, K. (2012). Mauritius Fody (Foudia rubra) Recovery Program Annual Report 2011-2012. Unpublished Report to the Mauritian Wildlife Foundation.
Howe, C., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2012a). Evaluating Indices of Conservation Success: A Comparative Analysis of Outcome- and Output-Based Indices. Animal Conservation, 15, 217-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2011.00516.x
Howe, C., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2012b). The View from the Office Is Not All Bad: Conservation Evaluation as a “Sexy” Research Goal. Animal Conservation, 15, 231-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00563.x
Jenks, B., Vaughan, P. W., & Butler, P. J. (2010). The Evolution of Rare Pride: Using Evaluation to Drive Adaptive Management in a Biodiversity Conservation Organization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33, 186-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.07.010
Juran, J. M. (1951). Juran’s Quality Control Handbook. New York: McGraw Hill.
Kapos, V., Balmford, A., Aveling, R., Bubb, P., Carey, P., Entwistle, A. et al. (2008). Calibrating Conservation: New Tools for Measuring Success. Conservation Letters, 1, 155-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00025.x
Kapos, V., Balmford, A., Aveling, R., Bubb, P., Carey, P., Entwistle, A. et al. (2009). Outcomes, Not Implementation, Predict Conservation Success. Oryx, 43, 336-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605309990275
Lamoreux, J., Chatwin, A., Foster, M., Kakoyannis, C., Vynne, C., Wolniakowski, K., & Gascon, C. (2014). Overcoming the Funder’s Dilemma. Biological Conservation, 175, 74-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.04.017
Leverington, F., Hockings, M., Pavese, H., Lemos Costa, K., & Courrau, J. (2008). Management Effectiveness Evaluation in Protected Areas: A Global Study (145 p). Supplementary Report No. 1: Overview of Approaches and Methodologies.
Manolis, J. C., Chan, K. M., Finkelstein, M. E., Stephens, S., Nelson, C. R., Grant, J. B., & Dombeck, M. P. (2009). Leadership: A New Frontier in Conservation Science. Conservation Biology, 23, 879-886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01150.x
Margoluis, R., Stem, C., Salafsky, N., & Brown, M. (2009). Design Alternatives for Evaluating the Impact of Conservation Projects. New Directions for Evaluation, 2009, 85-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ev.298
Martin, T. G., Nally, S., Burbidge, A. A., Arnall, S., Garnett, S. T., Hayward, M. W. et al. (2012). Acting Fast Helps Avoid Extinction. Conservation Letters, 5, 274-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00239.x
Mauritian Wildlife Foundation (2012; 2013; 2014; 2015). Monthly Mauritius Fody Report. Unpublished Report to the Mauritian Wildlife Foundation.
Mccready, M. (2013). Mauritius Fody Recovery Programme Annual Report 2012-2013 Season. Unpublished Report to the Mauritian Wildlife Foundation.
OECD (2007). Glossary of Statistical Terms.
Robb, G. N., McDonald, R. A., Chamberlain, D. E., & Bearhop, S. (2008). Food for Thought: Supplementary Feeding as a Driver of Ecological Change in Avian Populations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 476-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/060152
Rogers, P. J. (2008). Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions. Evaluation, 14, 29-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356389007084674
Senge, P. M., & Sterman, J. D. (1990). System Thinking and Organization Learning: Acting Locally and Thinking Globally in the Organization of the Future. In D. F. Andersen, G. P. Richardson, & J. D. Sterman (Eds.), System Dynamics 1990. 8th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Chestnut Hill, 7-10 December, 1007-1022. http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/1990/proceed/pdfs/senge1007.pdf
Soulé, M. E. (1985). What Is Conservation Biology? BioScience, 35, 727-734.
Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M., & Knight, T. M. (2004). The Need for Evidence-Based Conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 305-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018
Taplin, D. H., Clark, H., Collins, E., & Colby, D. C. (2013). Theory of Change: Technical Papers. New York.
Timko, J. A., & Innes, J. L. (2009). Evaluating Ecological Integrity in National Parks: Case Studies from Canada and South Africa. Biological Conservation, 142, 676-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.11.022
Wholey, J. S., Hatry, H. P., & Newcomer, K. E. (2010). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. Evaluation, 19, 1-4.
WWF (2003). A Guide to Organizational Assessment Process.
Young, R. P., Hudson, M. A., Terry, A. M. R., Jones, C. G., Lewis, R. E., Tatayah, V. et al. (2014). Accounting for Conservation: Using the IUCN Red List Index to Evaluate the Impact of a Conservation Organization. Biological Conservation, 180, 84-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.039