Institutional Matchmakers, Sponsors, and Strategists: Roles of Academic STEM Executives in Developing the Next Generation of Leaders — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Institutional Matchmakers, Sponsors, and Strategists: Roles of Academic STEM Executives in Developing the Next Generation of Leaders
Institute for Women’s Health and Leadership, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
,
Institute for Women’s Health and Leadership, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
,
Office of the Provost, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
,
Department of Educational Research, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA
1 Institute for Women’s Health and Leadership, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
2 Institute for Women’s Health and Leadership, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
3 Office of the Provost, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
4 Department of Educational Research, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA
Current literature shows a growing consensus about the importance of talent development of diverse leaders; however, less information is available about how this is accomplished within higher education and how these goals might be advanced or hindered by current practices. Interviews with 32 STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) academic leaders, most from engineering and computing sciences, provided information about how these leaders identify, select, develop, and support emerging leaders in their organizations. Interviews were coded specifically for mentoring and sponsorship practices. Coding of individual de-identified transcripts described general themes; poetic transcriptions created collective narratives to elaborate perspectives and practices across the themes. The leaders described three interdependent roles: 1) Matchmakers who watch for talent to “bubble up” and aim to determine “fit” of new positions to individual talents and optimal career timing; 2) Mentors and Sponsors who counsel and advocate to advance the careers of others; and 3) Institutional Strategists whose support of new leaders aims to minimize risk and achieve organizational goals. The practices described have both a future orientation and a potential for inhibiting diverse leadership development as a result of implicit bias in supporting academic status quo. Knowledge of these approaches is useful to aspiring and newly appointed leaders. Also, organizational leaders can use this information for more comprehensive talent development that creates a deeper talent pool for leaders across higher education.
American Council on Education (ACE) Fellows Program (2018). http://www.acenet.edu/leadership/programs/Pages/ACE-Fellows-Program.aspx
American Council on Education, American College President Study 2017 (2017). http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Pages/American-College-President-Study.aspx
Barber, M., Donnelly, K., & Rizvi, S. (2013). An Avalanche Is Coming, Higher Education and the Revolution Ahead. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to Plan and Perform a Qualitative Study Using Content Analysis. Nursing Plus Open, 2, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
Betts, K., Urias, D., & Betts, K. (2009). Higher Education and Shifting US Demographics: Need for Visible Administrative Paths, Professional Development, Succession Planning and Commitment to Diversity. Academic Leadership Journal, 7, No. 2. http://scholars.fhsu.edu/alj/vol7/iss2/6
Blumenstyk, G. (2005). Outside Chance for Insiders. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52, A28-A29. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Outside-Chance-for-Insiders/23524
Bridges, B. K., Eckel, P. D., Cordova, D. I., & White, B. P. (2008) Broadening the Leadership Spectrum: Advancing Diversity in the American College Presidency. Washington DC: American Council on Education.
Cahnemann, M. (2003). The Craft, Practice, and Possibility of Poetry in Educational Research. Educational Researcherer, 32, No. 3.
Carnes, M., & Bland, C. (2007). Viewpoint: A Challenge to Academic Health Centers and the National Institutes of Health to Prevent Unintended Gender Bias in the Selection of Clinical and Translational Science Award Leaders. Academic Medicine, 82, 202-206. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31802d939f
Carnes, M., Geller, S., Fine, E., Sheridan, J., & Handelsman, J. (2005). NIH Director’s Pioneer Awards: Could the Selection Process Be Biased against Women? Journal of Women’s Health, 14, No. 8. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2005.14.684
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Murphy, C. (2017). When Leaders Are Hired for Talent but Fired for Not Fitting In. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/06/when-leaders-are-hired-for-talent-but-fired-for-not-fitting-in
Clunies, J. (2004). Benchmarking Succession Planning and Executive Development in Higher Education. Academic Leadership Journal, 2, No. 4. http://scholarsfhsu.edu/alj/vol2iss4/3
DeZure, D., Shaw, A., & Rojewski, J. (2014). Cultivating the Next Generation of Academic Leaders: Implications for Administrators and Faculty. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. http://fod.msu.edu/sites/default/files/Cultivating%20the%20Next%20 Generation%20of%20Academic%20Leaders.pdf
Edwards, R., & Weller, S. (2012). Shifting Analytic Ontology: Using I-Poems in Qualitative Longitudinal Research. Qualitative Research, 12, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111422040
Fletcher, J. K. (2001). Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Foust-Cummings, H., Dinolfo, S., & Kohler, J. (2011). Sponsoring Women to Success. http://www.catalyst.org/system/files/sponsoring_women_to_success.pdf
Friedman, T. (2016). Thank You for Being Late, an Optimists Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations (pp. 257-262). New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.
Gigliotti, R. A., & Ruben, B. D. (2017). Preparing Higher Education Leaders: A Conceptual, Strategic, and Operational Approach. Journal of Leadership Education, 16.
Glesne, C. (1997). That Rare Feeling: Re-Presenting Research through Poetic Transcription. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 202-220.
Gmelch, W. H. (2000). Leadership Succession: How New Deans Take Charge and Learn the Job. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 7, 68-87.
Gmelch, W. H., Roberts, D., Ward, K., & Hirsch, S. (2017). A Retrospective View of Department Chairs: Lessons Learned. The Department Chair, 28, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.30140
Gonzalez, C. (2010). Leadership, Diversity and Succession Planning in Academia. Center for Studies in Higher Education. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/594483fq
Harvard Institute for Educational Management. https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ppe/program/institute-educational-management-iem
Hewlett, S. A., Marshall, M., & Sherbin, L. (2011). The Relationship You Need to Get Right: How to Be an Effective Sponsor—And a Good Protégé—Throughout Your Career. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2011/10/the-relationship-you-need-to-get-right
Hewlett, S. A., Peraino, K., Sherbin, L., & Sumberg, K. (2011). The Sponsor Effect: Breaking Through the Last Glass Ceiling. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Review Publishing.
Hoehn, A. R., Robbert, A. A., & Harrell, M. C. (2011). Succession Management for Senior Military Positions. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1081.html
Korn Ferry Institute (2015). Succession Matters: Effective Succession Planning. https://www.kornferry.com/institute/succession-matters-effective-succession-management-planning?popular
Korn-Ferry Institute (2018). A Critical Roadblock to Diversity. Korn-Ferry Reports and Insights. https://www.kornferry.com/institute/diversity-obstacles-corporate
Livingston, R., Rosette, A. S., & Washington, E. F. (2012). Can an Agentic Black Woman Get Ahead? The Impact of Race and Interpersonal Dominance on Perceptions of Female Leaders. Psychological Science, 23, 354-358.
Magrane, D., & Morahan, P. S. (2016). Fortifying the Pipeline to Leadership: The International Center for Executive Leadership in Academics at Drexel. In R. Heller, C. Mavriplis, & P. Sabila (Eds.), Forward to Professorship in STEM: Inclusive Faculty Development Strategies that Work (pp. 319-336). London, San Diego, Waltham, Oxford: Academic Press.
Markus, H. R., & Conner, A. (2013). Clash! How to Thrive in a Multicultural World. New York, NY: Hudson Street Press.
Morahan, P. S., Gleason, K. A., Richman, R. C., Dannels, S. A., & McDade, S. A. (2010). Advancing Women Faculty to Senior Leadership in U.S. Academic Health Centers: Fifteen Years of History in the Making. Journal about Women in Higher Education, 3, 137-162.
Morahan, P. S., Rosen, S. E., Richman, R. C., & Gleason, K. A. (2011). The Leadership Con-tinuum: A Framework for Organizational and Individual Assessment Relative to the Advancement of Women Physicians and Scientists. Journal of Women’s Health, 20, 387-396. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2010.2055
Patton, E. W., Griffith, K. A., Jones, R. D., Stewart, A., Ubel, P. A., & Jagsi, R. (2017). Differences in Mentor-Mentee Sponsorship in Male vs. Female Recipients of National Institutes of Health Grants. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177, 580-582. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9391
Rayburn, W., Grigsby, K., & Brubaker, L. (2016). The Strategic Value of Succession Planning for Department Chairs. Academic Medicine, 91, 456-468. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000990
Ross, H. J. (2014). Ch. 8 Incubators of Consciousness: Creating More Conscious Organizations. In H. J. Ross (Ed.), Everyday Bias (pp. 127-128). Rowman and Littlefield Lanham MD.
Rothwell, W. (2005). Effective Succession Planning; Ensuring Leadership Continuity and Building Talent from Within. New York, NY: American Management Corporation.
Travis, E. L. (2013). Sponsorship: A Talent Management Imperative for Science. Washington DC: Association for Women in Science. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/awis.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/Magazine_Article/Sponsorship.pdf https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a35456
White, J. S. (2012). HERS Institutes: Curriculum for Advancing Women Leaders in Higher Education. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 14, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422311429732