Phonetic Features of Sound-Copying Words Based on the Archival Materials
- 1 Department of Kyrgyz Linguistics, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 2 Humanitarian disciplines Cycle, Kyrgyz-Uzbek University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 3 Department of Philological Education Cycle, Industrial Pedagogical College, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 4 College of Humanities and Technologies, M.M. Adyshev Osh Technological University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 5 Department of Philological Education Cycle, Industrial Pedagogical College, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 6 Department of Kyrgyz Language, Jalal-Abad State University, Jalal-Abad, Kyrgyzstan
- 7 Science and Research Department, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
Abstract
This article is investigating sound composition of the onomatopoeic words in the Kyrgyz language from synchronous and diachronic aspects. Phonetic features and the order of sounds in the words composition were studied. Content of archival materials for creation of a dictionary of onomatopoeic words is discussed. The purpose of this work is to study the use of vowels and consonants in speech and the words mimicry of Kyrgyz language. Linguistic phenomenon is important in enriching the vocabulary of particular language; for this purpose, archival materials on the active use of vowels and consonants in different positions of onomatopoeic words were described.
- Abduvaliev, I., & Sadykov, T. (1997). Azyrky Kyrgyz tyli: Morphologya, Bishkek (296 p.).
- Aitmatov, Ch. (1984). Epos Manas. Sayakbay Karalaevs version (500 p.). Frunze: Kyrgyzstan.
- Ashirbaev, T. (2000). Kyrgyz tilinin stylistikasi: Phonetikalyk, soz jasoo jana lexikalyk stylistika (2nd ed., 172 p.). Bishkek.
- Cheung, C., Hamiton, L. S., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2016). The Auditory Representation of Speech Sounds in Human Motor Cortex. eLife, 27, e17181. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12577.018
- Forkel, R., List, J., Greenhill, S., Rzymski, C., Bank, S., Cysouw, M., Hammarström, H., Haspelmath, M., Kaipin, G. A., & Gray, R. D. (2018). Cross-Linguistic Data Formats, Advancing Data Sharing and Re-Use in Comparative Linguistics. Scientific Data, 5, Article ID: 180205. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.205
- Joseph, J. E. (1992). Modern Linguistics in Post-Modern Perspective. Language & Communication, 12, 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(92)90006-U
- Kongyratbay, T., Kamak, A., & Kongyratbay, K. (2014). Epos Is an Ethnic Source. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 3, 29-32.
- Laing, C. E. (2017). A Perceptual Advantage for Onomatopoeia in Early Word Learning: Evidence from Eye-Tracking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.017
- Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1983). Phonological Context in Speech Perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 338. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203046
- Mbarki, S., Mourchid, M., & Silberztein, M. (2019). Formalizing Natural Languages with NooJ and Its Natural Language Processing Applications. International Conference on Automatic Processing of Natural-Language (p. 811, 251 p.). Berlin: Springer International Publishing, Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73420-0
- Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (2014). How Arbitrary Is Language? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369, Article ID: 20130299. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0299
- Paice, C. D. (2016). Lexical Analysis of Textual Data. In L. Liu, & M. Özsu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Database Systems (4355 p.). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7993-3_941-2
- Pisoni, D. B. (1985). Speech Perception: Some New Directions in Research and Theory. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78, 381-388. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392451