The Liaison Interpreter’s Role as an Intercultural Mediator: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach
- 1 College of English, Zhejiang Yuexiu University, Shaoxing, China
Abstract
Liaison interpreting is a type of interpreting performed in cross-cultural communications. The role of liaison interpreters has been studied by scholars for many years. For a long time, interpreting has been regarded as a communication activity, which solely converted languages and transferred the linguistic meaning of the original utterances. However, the practitioners and researchers began to realize that interpreting is a bilingual as well as bicultural communication activity. It bridges the cultural gap for people who don’t share the same language or cultural background. Therefore, this paper proposes an account of the liaison interpreter’s role as intercultural mediator as an alternative to other accounts of the interpreter’s role in the literature on liaison interpreting. The account of the liaison interpreters’ role as intercultural mediator is derived from the principles of a theoretical framework that draws on the findings of the theory of sense (Seleskovitch and Lederer, 1995) and Sperber and Wilson’s (1986, 1995) relevance theory of communication (RT). The account provides the basis for formulating a clearer definition of the concept of intercultural mediation in the context of liaison interpreting (LI). With data from authentic examples from interpreters’ actual performance, this paper intends to analyze interpreter’s role as an intercultural mediator in interactions within the framework of cognitive-pragmatic approach (CPA). In order to enhance liaison interpreters’ competence of cultural mediation, the paper then provides some implications for interpreters training in China.
- Al-Zahran, A. (2007). The Consecutive Conference Interpreter as Intercultural Mediator: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach to the Interpreter’s Role. Ph.D. Thesis, Salford: University of Salford.
- Angelelli, C. V. (2000). Revisiting the Interpreter’s Role. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing.
- Angelelli, C. V. (2004). Medical Interpreting and Cross-Cultural Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486616
- Harriers, B. (1995). The Critical Link: Interpreters in a Community. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Lederer, M. (1990). The Role of Cognitive Complements in Interpreting. In D. Bowen, & M. Bowen (Eds.), Interpreting: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow (pp. 53-60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.iv.11led
- Liu, H. P. (2001). Techniques of Interpreting. Beijing: China Translation Corporation.
- Roy, C. B. (2000). Interpreting as a Discourse Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Seleskovitch, D. (1978). Language and Cognition. In D. Gerver, & H. W. Sinaiko (Eds.), Language Interpretation and Communication (pp. 333-341). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9077-4_29
- Seleskovitch, D., & Lederer, M. (1995). A Systematic Approach to Teaching Interpretation. Silver Spring, MD: Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf. (Translated from French by Jacolyn Harmer)
- Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Wadensjö, C. (1998). Interpreting as Interaction . London and New York: Longman.
- Xu, W. X. (2019). On the Construction of Subjectivity of Football Liaison Interpreters Ph.D. Thesis, Beijing: Beijing Foreign Studies University.