Cognitemes in the Kyrgyz Speech Etiquette and Ways of Their Interpretation in Language
- 1 Department of Foreign Languages, Kyrgyz State University named after I. Arabaev, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
- 2 Department of Kyrgyz Linguistics, J. Balasagyn Kyrgyz National University, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
- 3 Department of Languages and Intercultural Communication, Kyrgyz State Juridical University, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
- 4 Department of Philology, Regional Studies, Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 5 Department of Philology, Regional Studies, Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 6 Department of English Language Teaching Methodic, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 7 Department of English Phonetics and Grammar, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 8 Department of American Studies and Translation, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 9 Department of Russian Language Teaching Methodic, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
- 10 Science and Research Department, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan
Abstract
The article describes Kyrgyz speech formulas regulating communicating people behavior. Research relevance based on the lack of previous study results about generally accepted prohibitions in the Kyrgyz people speech etiquette, content limit, direction, speakers implementation, presupposing the rules of national communication etiquette and performing important functions in shaping the speech culture of young people. The purpose of this article is to describe cognitive-semantic originality and constructive-syntactic structure of traditional precedent formulas in the Kyrgyz speech ensuring the normal flow of interpersonal communications. After factual material analyses, the main typical requirements for the speech culture distinguished. The most important imperative expressions associating with speech etiquette in the language characterized. Obtained results are necessary for studying the speech culture theory and practice, since they provide general information about requirements in the Kyrgyz speech and verbal communication by contributing to the formation and development of ideas among young people about certain rules for generating speech.
- Abdraeva, A. T., & Madaminova, D. B. (2018a). Kyrgyz Linguo-Ethnocultural Prohibitions from the Point of View of Turkish and English Mentality. Modern Trends in the Development of Science and Technology. Periodic Scientific Collection. Belgorod, Part I, 6-11.
- Abdraeva, A. T., & Madaminova, D. B. (2018b). Linguo-Ethno-Mental Taboos of the Kyrgyz People Associated with Food and Animals. New Technologies in Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education: Current State, Problems, Development Prospects. Periodic Scientific Collection. Belgorod, Part I. 11-18.
- Akmataliev, A. S. (2000). Ageless Kyrgyz values (p. 348). Bishkek.
- Ebadi, S., & Asakereh, A. (2017). Developing EFL Learners’ Speaking Skills through Dynamic Assessment: A Case of a Beginner and an Advanced Learner. Cogent Education, 4, Article ID: 1419796. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1419796
- Fowler, C. A. (2014). Talking as Doing: Language Forms and Public Language. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.007
- Ivanova, E. V. (2006). Peace in English and Russian Proverbs (p. 278). St. Petersburg.
- Jdetawy, L. F., & Hamzah, M. H. (2020). Linguistic Etiquette: A Review from a Pragmatic Perspective. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 14, 695-717.
- Kabylov, T. B. (2011). The Linguistic Essence of the Imperative (p. 22). Thesis, Bishkek.
- Karasaev, H. (1982). Folk Sayings (p. 368). Frunze.
- Kasper, G. (2017). Linguistic Etiquette. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 374-385). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405166256.ch23
- Koichumanov, J. (2012). Proverbs, Sayings, Catchphrases, Wise Thoughts (p. 540). Bishkek: Biyiktik Plus.
- Korcsok, B., Faragó, T., Ferdinandy, B., Miklósi, á., Korondi, P., & Gácsi, M. (2020). Artificial Sounds Following Biological Rules: A Novel Approach for Non-Verbal Communication in HRI. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 7080. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63504-8
- Madmarova, G. A. (2017). Intercultural Concepts in the Text of a Work of Art (p. 392). Bishkek.
- Malyuga, E., Maksimova, D., & Ivanova, M. (2019). Cognitive and Discoursive Features of Speech Etiquette in Corporate Communication. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9, 310-318. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n3p310