The Linguistic Expressions of <i>Danshu</i> (Provisos) in Chinese Laws
- 1 School of Languages and Cultures, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China
- 2 School of Foreign Languages, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China
Abstract
In legislative texts, proviso is used to provide for exceptions or to add certain conditions to the provisions in the main clause. In Chinese legislative texts, proviso is called danshu , for it is initiated by the words dan/danshi . The linguistic expressions of danshu have not been fully described. This study, based on a self-built mini-corpus of danshu of Chinese legislative texts, aims to describe the linguistic expressions of danshu , summarize the syntactic patterns and core words thereof, and explain the reasons. This study will shed light on the normalization of Chinese legislative texts, especially the linguistic expressions of danshu , improve the quality of Chinese legislation, and enrich the study of provisos in legislative texts other than those in English language.
- Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style (pp. 4-5). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358
- Crystal, D., & Davy, D. (1969). Investigating English Style. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
- Dong, X. F. (2003). The Use of de Phrase as a Post Relative Clause: Comments on the Use of de Phrase in Legislative Texts. Applied Linguistics, 4, 120-126.
- Doonan, E., & Foster, C. (2001). Drafting (2nd ed.). London/Sydney: Cavendish Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843140986
- Editorial Board (2010). Encyclopedia of Chinese Characters [cí hǎi] (6th ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Cishu Publishing House.
- Garner, A. B. (2019). Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed.). St. Paul, MN: Thomson Reuters.
- Gong, M. Y., Cheng, W., & Cheng, L. (2020). Development of Deontic Modality in Chinese Civil Laws: A Corpus Study. Pragmatics and Society, 11, 337-362. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16058.gon
- Hu, D. H., & Jiang, C. G. (2016). Translation of De Constructions from Legal Sentences under the Guidance of Self-Designation and Transferred-Designation. Language and Translation, 3, 45-52.
- Huang, B. R., & Liao, X. D. (2011). Modern Chinese [xiàn dài hàn yǔ] (5th ed., Part II). Beijing: Higher Education Press.
- Legislative Affairs Committee of the National People’s Congress (2009). Technical Guideline for Legislation (Trial, Part I) [lì fǎ jì shù guī fàn (shì xíng)]. Document Code: [2009]62.
- Liu, H. Y. (2007). Legal Linguistics [fǎ lǜ yǔ yán xué] (2nd ed.). Beijing: Peking University Press.
- Liu, H. Y. (2018). Legal Linguistics [fǎ lǜ yǔ yán xué]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
- Liu, S. S. (2016). Research on Chinese Legislation [zhōng guó lì fǎ wèn tí yán jiū]. Beijing: Intellectual Property Publishing House.
- Luo, H. Y., & Wang, S. (2018). The Transitional Sentences in Legislative Language in the Cases of the dan and danshi Sentences. Contemporary Rhetoric, 6, 77-89.
- Mellinkoff, D. (2014). The Language of the Law. Translated by Liao Meizhen. Beijing: Law Press China.
- Pan, Q. Y. (2004). Law Language Is a Technical One Different from National Language. Journal of Jianghan University (Humanities Sciences), 2, 18-22.